4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,663–3,689 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 07:15
3,666
-8
9 Aug 2026, 11:04
3,674
-12
6 Aug 2026, 12:30
3,686
no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:19
3,686
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 11 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
306 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
123
40.2%
❤
63
20.6%
😢
38
12.4%
🔥
34
11.1%
👎
20
6.54%
🥰
7
2.29%
💩
5
1.63%
🙈
3
0.98%
👀
2
0.654%
😁
2
0.654%
😐
2
0.654%
🤮
2
0.654%
🥴
2
0.654%
🎃
1
0.327%
👏
1
0.327%
🤡
1
0.327%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 306reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 31 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 16 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TokenTacticsGo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 September 2025 to 31 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вы просили рассказать, если мы будем запускать новый проект.
И вот время пришло.⏱
Работая над Token Tactics, мы старались как могли, чтобы сократить расходы на поддержание проекта, поэтому глубоко изучили возможности нейросетей, и применяли их везде где возможно.
За это время нейросети стали для нас не просто рабочим инструментом, но и неотъемлемой частью жизни в целом.
Сейчас мы применяем их каждый день, от созда…
⚠️ Последнее уведомление: Закрытие Token Tactics ⚠️
Напоминаем, что завтра, 14 октября, в 17:00 UTC игровая платформа Token Tactics официально прекращает свою работу.
Это последняя возможность вывести ваши средства!
Если у вас на балансе 20 или более заработанных USDT и выполнены все условия для вывода (см. картинку к этому посту для деталей), пожалуйста, немедленно отправляйте запрос на вывод средств.
==========…
🔴 IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT
Token Tactics will shut down on October 15.
We’ve been working tirelessly for almost 1️⃣0️⃣ months — together with you we’ve had both wins and mistakes. We’re proud that we built a quality product that helped many of you better understand crypto and feel more confident in trading and investing.
🙏 A huge thank you to our community — without your support and participation, this project would…
7️⃣9️⃣ vUSD, 6️⃣ сделок и 2️⃣5️⃣0️⃣XP бесплатно
👉У нас отличные новости!
Мы добавили два новых задания и расширили дополнительные возможности для получения vUSD.
Простая математика: если выполнить все задания, ты сможешь получить целых 79 vUSD, а также 6 дополнительных сделок и 250 XP. Это твой шанс быстро увеличить свой баланс и прокачать аккаунт.
Не откладывай! Действуй прямо сейчас и забирай свои награды.
====…
Получи vUSD бесплатно прямо сейчас
Мы только что добавили новую задачу в раздел «Награды».
Зайди, выполни простое задание и получи 5️⃣ vUSD.
Отличный способ начать неделю 💸
Не откладывай — действуй!
==========================
Get free vUSD right now
We’ve just added a new task to the Rewards section.
Complete a simple assignment and receive 5️⃣ vUSD.
A perfect way to kick off the week 💸
Don’t wait — take action!…
Trader Tournament Results — Round 1️⃣6️⃣
Another week, another competition!
Prizes will be credited directly to trading balances — congrats to the winners! 🙌
Here are the top traders of this round:
1️⃣ @a_lunnikov — 300 vUSD
3️⃣@zodiakus66 — 100 vUSD
4th–10th places — 50 vUSD each:
4️⃣ @T01SL
5️⃣ @MARYAN_111
7️⃣ @KRESTANDLIKA
9️⃣ @AndTouch
📌 Reminder:
It doesn’t matter whether your trades are big or small — ac…
Get 1000 vUSD for FREE
We’re expanding our partnership with OKX and launching extra bonuses for everyone ready to dive into real trading:
🔴Users who have created a new account are allowed to participate only by following our link from this post 🔴
1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ vUSD → for a $100 deposit + $500 trading volume
5️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ vUSD → for a $20 deposit + your first trade
How to claim your reward:
1️⃣ Sign up on OKX
2️⃣ Co…
Not long ago, we put together a detailed 30-page guide on how to create an account on OKX and make your first trade.
Looking back, we might have gone a little overboard 😅
Now it’s much simpler: just watch this short 5-minute video and you’ll be ready to start trading real assets on OKX right away.
🇬🇧 OKX VIDEO Guide EN https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qVG1kjGByrUzghiE6vJdmKXQr2MSA1tS/view?usp=sharing
=============…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TokenTacticsGo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,019,107 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TokenTacticsGo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@belkaisruema12 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TokenTactics News” (@TokenTacticsGo), 3,666 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TokenTacticsGo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.