9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,503–5,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 03:47
5,516
-13
27 Aug 2026, 03:28
5,529
-11
24 Aug 2026, 12:28
5,540
-6
21 Aug 2026, 02:16
5,546
-10
17 Aug 2026, 23:41
5,556
-18
14 Aug 2026, 23:06
5,574
-18
11 Aug 2026, 05:31
5,592
-8
7 Aug 2026, 19:53
5,600
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:48
5,600
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 5,516 subscribers
Avg views / post
837
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
41 (4 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
34,314
Reactions total
2,702
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,702 reactions across 41 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,262
46.7%
👎
467
17.3%
👍
365
13.5%
🔥
267
9.88%
👏
172
6.37%
👌
94
3.48%
🤝
38
1.41%
🙏
33
1.22%
💯
3
0.111%
🤯
1
0.037%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,702reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔔پس زنگ خطر الان کجاست؟
آن روز گفتیم کامل نمیزنیم چون از سه شرط توزیع، فقط یکی روشن بود.
امروز دو شرط روشن است:
هجوم خرد ✓
بازگشت فروشندهی درشت ✓
تنها چراغی که هنوز خاموش است، سومی است توقف قیمت.
تا وقتی شاخص سقف میزند، جریان ورودی دارد و بار فروشنده را میخرد بازی ادامه دارد روزی که این جریان بایستد و اولین روز منفی با معاملات سنگین رقم بخورد چراغ سوم روشن میشود و آن روز دیگر گزارش «هشدار» نمینویسیم؛ گزار…
🧡فاز آخر میتواند پرشتاب باشد، اما جنسش هیجان است»
این موضوع مو به مو در حال اجراست.
شتاب آمد و سه درصد در سه جلسه رشد کردیم.
امضای هیجان هم وجود دارد امروز، سرانهی فروشنده (۱۰۰) از سرانهی خریدار (۸۹) بزرگتر شد آن هم در روزی که شاخص یکونیم درصد مثبت بود.
در سقف، فروشندهها درشتترند و خریدارها ریزتر این جمله را دوباره بخوانید؛ کل ترازنامهی این سه روز همین است.
ادامه در پست بعدی
@thefinancee✅
«جریان پول همچنان مثبت، یک روز خروج موجودی را نخورده»!
موجودی سالم ماند، اما جریان چرخید.
پول تجمعی پانزده جلسه هنوز ۲۸ همت مثبت است؛ آن حرف سر جایش اما عددی که آن روز نداشتیم و امروز داریم اینه که پول خالص سه جلسهی اخیر منفی شده ( منفی ۲.۸ همت)، در سه جلسهای که بازار سه سقف زد رالی دیگر با پول تازه بالا نرفت بلکه دارد دستبهدست بالا میرود.
به زبان ساده یعنی موجودی انبار پر است ولی شیر ورودی عملاً بسته شده.
…
🧡پیگیری گزارش «روز آزمون» | ۲۰ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
سه جلسه پیش نوشتیم که «بازار ۶۵ همت عرضه را جذب کرد و مثبت بست عرضهای به این سنگینی که نتواند قیمت را پایین بکشد، یعنی تقاضا هنوز زنده و عمیق است.»
بیایید صادقانه حساب پس بدهیم که هر جملهی آن گزارش، این سه روز چه سرنوشتی پیدا کرد:
«تقاضا زنده و عمیق است!»
زنده؟
کاملاً درست بود وقتی سه سقف متوالی می زنیم و از آن روز سه درصد بالاتر هستیم این موضوع نشان دهنده زنده بودن …
با تثبیت انس، طلای داخل داره شکاف رو پر میکنه در ضمن دلار هم ی بالایی زده !
اگه وویس بالارو گوش نکردید ضرر کردید!
هیچ کجا نمیتونید این دیتای رایگان با کیفیت رو پیدا کنید!
@thefinancee
✍️در نهایت لطفا قدر یک سری اطلاعات و داده هایی که کلا رایگان میدیم رو بدونید. باور کنید به نام های مختلف مبالغ بالای 1000 دلار دریافت میکنن که بهتون مشاوره بدن. ته مشاوره اقتصادیشونم این بود که تو کف انس جهانی طلا و نقره ناامید شدند گفتند نگهداری دلار بهتر از طلا و نقرس!این یک داستان واقعیه خیلیاتون هم میدونید که چه کسانی اینطور بودند. تمام تلاش ما این بوده در دام این افراد نیفتید اگر افتادید واقعیت احتمالا مقصر خودت…
📊اما با احتیاط کامل جلو میریم. چرا؟ یک علتش این چارته. قیمت گازوئیل در آمریکا. بیش از ۲ برابر شده و اثر این افزایش مستقیما در اقتصاد و قیمتها دیده میشه! یعنی میتونه فشار تورمی بیاره و در نهایت ممکنه فد رو مجبور به افزایش نرخ بهره کنه!!
برای همین دیتای چهارشنبه تورم بسیار بسیار برامون مهمه.
@Thefinancee
📈این نمودار رو بچههای منتورشیپ استاد استفاده ازش هستند. اینجا هم ازش زیاد حرف زدم. با استفاده از این چارت باید بتونید روی ایندکسا یعنی S&P و Nasdaq پوزیشن بگیرید.
@Thefinancee
✅انتظار داشتیم این چارت به سمت ۳.۸ حرکت کنه که کرد. انتظار از نرخ بهره فد تا پایان سال. نتیجه چی شد؟رشد ده درصدی طلا و بیست درصدی در انس جهانی نقره.
@Thefinancee
✍️هم اکنون شاهد تیتر فوری در سوشال مدیا از سمت اساتید در مورد قیمت نفت هستیم. سعی میکنند جو بدن و ویو بگیرن و دریغ از ارائه یک تحلیل.اگر به خاطر داشته باشید گفته بودیم دورانی فرا خواهد رسید که نفت رشد میکند اما دلیلش جنگ و تنش نیست. کندل امروز نفت از اون روزها بود.
راستی از قابلیت جذاب خبرچی در سایت فایننس غافل نشید عزیزان.
https://thefinance.ir/khabarchi
❤20👎12👌9🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @TheFinancee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,426,256 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Finance | تحلیل بازارهای مالی” (@TheFinancee), 5,516 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheFinancee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.