悲剧啊😭大意了,因为初始症状没有刀片嗓我就没有第一时间做肛拭子,还坚持去办公室投毒,问心有愧,决定翘班从现在开始🤨
🔥2

Channel
@TheB1ackParade
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,046subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001459082815 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheB1ackParade |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheB1ackParade |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 1,046 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 1,047 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 1,047 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (17 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,767 |
| Reactions total | 61 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
151 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 31.1% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 12.6% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 11.9% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 8.61% | |
| ⚡ | 12 | 7.95% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 7.28% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 6.62% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 4.64% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 4.64% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.31% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheB1ackParade. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
悲剧啊😭大意了,因为初始症状没有刀片嗓我就没有第一时间做肛拭子,还坚持去办公室投毒,问心有愧,决定翘班从现在开始🤨
🔥2
手滑眼瞎型 bug 是我一生之敌,下面的 n 皇后我一次写出然后 wrong answer,肉眼观察+心灵分析+小黄鸭debug十多分钟毫无进展只能请教 LLM 才发现写错变量。别问为什么不一开始就 LLM debug,面试考察心灵😭至于为什么我还在用心灵面试,中老年再就业是这样的,人无再少年😊 class Solution: def solveNQueens(self, n: int) -> List[List[str]]: chess = [[0] * n for _ in range(n)] ans = [] def search(idx): if idx == n: o = [] for line in chess: o.append(''…
看了昨天 @ManjusakaH 转发的 simd 科普之后我才知道原来字符串搜索也可以 simd,我当时就萌生了一个大胆的想法,何不买一根 335mm Φ8mm 的金属棒 何不让 bpf 也用 simd 搜索 http header,目前的实践都是狗屎,我和同事在 6.1 ec2 上编译 kfunc 的惨痛经历仿佛还在昨天😭 任务是从巨型 HTTP/1.1 payload 里搜索你喜欢的 header,比如 Host: GET /url HTTP/1.1 User-Agent: xxx X-Forward: xxx X-Metadata: xxx [...1000+ bytes...] Host: xxx 虽然 bpf simd 是做不了的,但可以 SWAR 啊,我用 go 写一遍是这样的 const ( repeatLF = uint64(0x0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a) ones = uint64…
⚡12
下面的 go 程序能跑起来吗? package main import ( "log" "net" "os" ) func main() { ln, err := net.Listen("tcp", ":"+os.Args[1]) if err != nil { log.Fatal(err) } defer ln.Close() select {} } 有了 LLM 就跟玩游戏输秘籍似的,operation CWAL,猜谜都不 exciting 了😵 直接快进到答案,取决于 CGO_ENABLED,=0 会被判定死锁,=1 可以跑起来,原因就问 LLM 吧🤬 (发现 ps -o wchan 很好用,还有 /proc/pid/stack,procfs 真是大秘宝
🤯10
我手搓的 HTTP/1.1 header 搜索居然比 bpf kfunc 还快,直达天际的好奇心,咕咕咕咕,不可思议都成了常识,拉哩噜雷啦啦啦。 事已至此,先发一张AI裸体虎杖悠仁 奥西里斯天空龙冷静一下,明天 wfh 摸鱼的时候再仔细介绍,感谢隔壁频道给我零感让我异想天开,性奋。
👀7🔥3
中午已经听到捷报,AI在人类看世界杯的时候随手证否了八十多年前的著名数学猜想😂 猜你喜欢:OpenAI 证明单位距离猜想 https://m.bilibili.com/video/BV1G7jJ6nEbV
病假当年假休了十天,在b站学习筛法证明素数的有界间距,独立战旗游戏《Tactical Breach Wizards》全成就进度68%,三场中老年异性恋地下情人故事会,不看书不学习一行代码都不写,马龙甚至还拿了男双冠军,这样的日子不多,要珍惜。
❤15
已品😭两面傩兰的上一作我完全嗤之以鼻,但这一作实在是太棒了,比马眼棒还要棒!
😁4🌭2
众所周知,“苏俄历史上唯一一次考虑使用核武器是针对中国”——知乎 作者:牛角挂书 链接:https://www.zhihu.com/question/606136741/answer/2032231387009435041 来源:知乎 著作权归作者所有。商业转载请联系作者获得授权,非商业转载请注明出处。 1969年8月20日:苏联驻美大使多勃雷宁奉命在华盛顿紧急约见美国总统国家安全事务助理基辛格,在白宫地下室进行了通宵密谈,正式通报了苏联的完整计划。打击目标:优先摧毁中国酒泉导弹发射基地、罗布泊核试验场、青海核原料加工厂三大核设施;其次打击北京、长春、鞍山、沈阳等政治中心与军工集群城市。为了避免美国可能的反对,计划中删除了东南沿海城市,防止美国以人道主义危机的理由反对该计划。打击手段为动用远东、中亚军区部署的SS-4、SS-5中程弹道导弹,携带100万-500万吨级核弹头,实施多轮饱和打击,计划投入核弹头总量达120枚,总当量…
👍6
天雷滚滚我好怕怕 地铁看吵架我笑嘻嘻: https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1080162/795d3838e471262c/ The series is completely unmergeable as it stands. Not even close. code war crimes against __rmqueue_smallest() something you expect to see on a 1990's PHP website, not in core mm code 导演剪辑版: https://lwn.net/ml/all/aj9yrlB0TrlYCLlf@lucifer 评论区还有 DLC I'll stop subscribing to LWN unless you stop this mindless LLM marketing. I'm not intereste…
惊呆了,你们金融公司用的编程语言一个比一个不正常,我在十多年前非洲学过 APL 家族的 J 语言,所以一眼认出这是 APL 家族的 Q 语言,给大家感受一下这种函数式面向数组语言是怎么写递归阶乘的: {$[x=0;1;x*.z.s[x-1]]} 数组是第一公民数据结构: q)dict:`items`sales`prices!(items;sales;prices) q)dict items | nut bolt cam cog sales | 6 8 0 3 prices| 10 20 15 20 访问 kdb+ 的 TCP server: q)h:hopen 5000 / connect to the server q)h(add;2;3) / pass the client function 'add' to the server and execute, passing…
❤1
抹茶发现 netfilter userspace library "libnftnl" 的 examples/nft-set-elem-add.c 跑不起来,看 syscall 也看不懂,毕竟 netlink msg 谁™能看懂? 一起痛骂 “libnftnl 是什么垃圾” 和 “你的 7.2 内核太新了,新内核全是 bug 很合理” 之后,我也好奇起来了,netlink syscall 报错溯因对我来说也是个谜,正好学习一下,而且这周工作写文档太恶心了想裸奔。 经过一堆准备工作之后: 1. 修改代码让它变成一个“启动暂停、 ctrl-c 继续运行” 的两阶段程序,延长进程生命方便我用 pid 过滤事件 2. 下载 linux-image-$(uname -r)-dbgsym 方便映射符号 3. 准备 @eBPFTalk001 的 bpfsnoop 方便用 lbr 回溯内核执行流 4. 准备 brendangregg/per…
🙏7
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TheB1ackParade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 253,447 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Welcome to the Black Parade” (@TheB1ackParade), 1,046 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheB1ackParade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.