Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tendencia Android

@TendenciaAndroid

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,798subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001003784728
TypeChannel
Username@TendenciaAndroid
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TendenciaAndroid

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@AndroideLibre/404215 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC@TendenciaAndroid/108497 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC1.0025 minutes
@TendenciaAndroid/108500 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC@AndroideLibre/404236 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC1.0012 hours
@TendenciaAndroid/108501 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC@AndroideLibre/404246 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC1.006.1 hours
@TendenciaAndroid/108502 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC@AndroideLibre/404256 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC1.006.1 hours
@TendenciaAndroid/108503 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC@AndroideLibre/404266 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC1.005.1 hours
@TendenciaAndroid/108504 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC@AndroideLibre/404276 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC1.002.8 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@AndroideLibre19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.5 hoursthis entry (118)
@enterateya15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0082 minutes@enterateya (87)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 16 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 32 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @enterateya. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,7971,7991,7985 August 2026 — 1,797 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,797 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,799 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,798 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,797–1,799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:051,798-1
9 Aug 2026, 21:311,799+2
6 Aug 2026, 06:511,797no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:451,797first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.23%
avg views ÷ 1,798 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.0
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held35 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,401
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026

Xiaomi va a cambiar sus teléfonos para siempre: HyperOS 4 llegará con los mejores efectos cristal https://www.elespanol.com/elandroidelibre/noticias-y-novedades/20260807/xiaomi-va-cambiar-telefonos-siempre-hyperos-llegara-mejores-efectos-cristal/1003744347028_0.html

7 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC9 viewsread 7 August 2026

Pilas Thomson Power Plus USB-C: análisis y opinión https://androidtr.es/pilas-thomson-power-plus-usb-c-analisis-opinion/

7 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026

Google quiere que le puedas dar la paga a tu hijo a través de Google Wallet sin necesidad de que tenga cuenta bancaria https://www.elespanol.com/elandroidelibre/aplicaciones/20260807/google-quiere-puedas-dar-paga-hijo-traves-wallet-sin-necesidad-cuenta-bancaria/1003744346525_0.html

7 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026

Google Wallet lanza un control parental para gestionar el dinero de los hijos https://androidtr.es/google-wallet-control-parental-dinero/

7 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC23 viewsread 7 August 2026

Google Maps se convierte en tu asistente personal y se actualiza para poder pedir comida sin salir de la app y mucho más https://www.elespanol.com/elandroidelibre/aplicaciones/20260807/google-maps-convierte-asistente-personal-actualiza-poder-pedir-comida-sin-salir-app/1003744346447_0.html

7 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC31 viewsread 7 August 2026

Probamos el Galaxy Z Fold8: Samsung cambia la forma en la que entiendes cómo usar un plegable y vas a querer uno https://www.elespanol.com/omicrono/analisis-prueba-productos/20260807/probamos-galaxy-fold8-samsung-cambia-forma-entiendes-usar-plegable-vas-querer/1003744343099_0.html

6 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC39 viewsread 7 August 2026

Novedades en los grupos de WhatsApp: menciones globales y mejores encuestas https://androidtr.es/novedades-grupos-whatsapp/

6 Aug 2026, 23:40 UTC36 viewsread 7 August 2026

Descubre Microsoft PowerToys: la suite definitiva para exprimir Windows 11 https://androidtr.es/powertoys-windows-11/

6 Aug 2026, 23:39 UTC34 viewsread 7 August 2026

Verificación automática del número en Android: cómo funciona y sus riesgos de privacidad https://androidtr.es/verificacion-numero-android-privacidad/

6 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026

Samsung prepara un móvil más barato pero con casi todo lo bueno de los mejores: el Galaxy S26 FE se filtra https://www.elespanol.com/elandroidelibre/noticias-y-novedades/20260806/samsung-prepara-movil-barato-bueno-mejores-galaxy-s26-fe-filtra/1003744346241_0.html

6 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC44 viewsread 7 August 2026

Google Chrome por fin permite ver Netflix a 4K: qué es lo que necesitas para disfrutar de la máxima calidad posible https://www.elespanol.com/elandroidelibre/noticias-y-novedades/20260806/google-chrome-fin-permite-ver-netflix-necesitas-disfrutar-maxima-calidad-posible/1003744346143_0.html

6 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC39 viewsread 7 August 2026

Samsung hace historia: los nuevos plegables Galaxy baten todos los récords de reservas en Europa y dejan de ser un nicho https://www.elespanol.com/elandroidelibre/noticias-y-novedades/20260806/samsung-hace-historia-nuevos-plegables-galaxy-baten-records-reservas-europa-dejan-nicho/1003744345913_0.html

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @TendenciaAndroid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,058,790 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tendencia Android” (@TendenciaAndroid), 1,798 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TendenciaAndroid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.