Channel
@Telos_Channel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,515subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001925734577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Telos_Channel |
| Description | Telos Rules 1. No FUD/Toxicity/Profanity/Discrimination/NSFW 2. No Refs/Ads/Spam 3. English only 4. Eth BNB ecosystem only/no btc 5. No FUD/P&D 6. Mod-disputes in PM 7. No brigading/manipulation Announcements: @Telos_Group |
| Created | 15 May 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Telos_Channel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 14,515 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 14,524 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 15 May 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (15 May 2023 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,028 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
644 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 374 | 58.1% | |
| ❤ | 121 | 18.8% | |
| 🥰 | 41 | 6.37% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 4.81% | |
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 3.88% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 2.64% | |
| 🎉 | 16 | 2.48% | |
| 🖕 | 13 | 2.02% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.466% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 0.311% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.155% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 644reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2023 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💰Telos Airdrop Announcement 🔥 🎁 Earn 20,000 $TLOS ($280) For Every Each Refer 4,500 $TLOS ($63) ⏰ Distribution Date - 12 Aug 2026 ➡️ Airdrop link https://t.me/TelosAirdrop_bot?start ✅️ Don't Miss Free Income Chance
🥰8❤🔥1💘1
Chapter 2 is live. 50,000 TLOS award allocation has been set by the x.com/HelloTelos Foundation! Month 2 is LIVE! 💢Complete Telos quests. 💢Earn TLOS XP. 💢Climb the leaderboard. Your XP helps determine your allocation. GL HF afyniti.xyz
🔥1
Project Lightspeed begins now. Over the coming days and weeks, we’ll unveil a series of major protocol upgrades to Telos. Many are already live on testnet. Telos is getting faster, more reliable, and easier to run, while laying the foundation for privacy-preserving technology and the next era of Web3. This is the beginning of a new infrastructure cycle for Telos.
👍167❤54🔥30👏12🎉9🆒3🥰2
Telos EVM <> Telos Zero bridging is coming to Telos Bridge. Soon you’ll be able to move $USDC, $USDT, $WBTC $TLOS and more across Telos with one clean flow. It’s part of a bigger effort to make every Telos platform feel connected, unified, and easy to use.
👍37🥰8🎉7👏5❤2
Telos is the Ghost Layer. A new Telos campaign is now live on @Afyniti_, with 50,000 TLOS allocated for campaign rewards. Complete missions. Earn XP. Justify your claim! Enter now: Afyniti.xyz
👍144❤65❤🔥24🥰23🖕13
Privacy is quietly turning into the thing every serious protocol has to answer for. We're putting three of the teams actually building it around one table. Privacy Leaders Roundtable: The Future of Web3 Privacy ▸ Beldex - @BeldexCoin ▸ Midnight - @midnightfdn ▸ Telos - @HelloTelos Private transactions, confidential computation, compliant privacy. One conversation. 📅 Thursday, 16 July, 2PM UTC 🎙 Live on X Spaces
👍26👨💻2
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Telos_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Telos_Channel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telos Channel” (@Telos_Channel), 14,515 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Telos_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.