Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -1,208. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107,527–109,097 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 02:06
107,708
-264
11 Aug 2026, 00:01
107,972
-213
10 Aug 2026, 01:51
108,185
-319
8 Aug 2026, 22:20
108,504
-254
7 Aug 2026, 22:31
108,758
-158
7 Aug 2026, 11:00
108,916
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:48
108,916
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.68%
avg views ÷ 107,708 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,050
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
38 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
191,730
Reactions total
1,169
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈920
Videos
≈113
Links
≈1,290
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
17s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,169 reactions across 38 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🌚
263
22.5%
custom 5197515644886611277
158
13.5%
❤
154
13.2%
👍
138
11.8%
custom 5195350221160214197
111
9.50%
🔥
92
7.87%
custom 5318952224523574770
80
6.84%
🤩
43
3.68%
🥰
40
3.42%
🐳
36
3.08%
👏
35
2.99%
🎉
15
1.28%
❤🔥
3
0.257%
😍
1
0.086%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
92
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 38 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
35
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TeleScanOfficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔺 И ещё один штраф
Таганский суд Москвы за 10 минут четыре раза оштрафовал Telegram за отказ удалять запрещённую информацию — в сумме на 14,6 млн рублей. Суммы отдельных штрафов — 3,8 млн, 2,8 млн, 1 млн и 7 млн рублей.
🌈 В протоколах фигурировали материалы о зацепинге, продаже ответов на ЕГЭ и пропаганде ЛГБТ*. Информацию требовали удалить Краснодарский и Владивостокский суды.
*ЛГБТ признано экстремистским движен…
🔗 Wildberries удалили из App Store.
UPD: Пока только в США. Похожая ситуация была с другими приложениями перед удалением из российского магазина.
...уже доступно для скачивания
🔍 Telescan
🔍 Общение
💊 Новая партия штрафов
Таганский суд Москвы оштрафовал стриминговую платформу Kick на 5 млн рублей, а разработчика чат-ботов Character Technologies (Character.ai) — на 1,25 млн рублей.
👀 В случае Kick поводом стали пять трансляций американских стримеров на английском языке с запрещённой информацией. Представитель компании заявила, что Kick использует геоблокировку и контент не был рассчитан на российскую аудиторию.…
⛔️ Ozon Банк удалили из Google Play
Приложение Ozon Банка стало недоступно в Google Play. При этом в App Store оно пока остаётся доступным.
🔽 Ранее, в конце июля, Ozon Банк попал под санкции Евросоюза в рамках 21-го пакета ограничений, а 6 августа — ещё и под британские санкции.
❓ При этом санкции ЕС введены непосредственно против ОЗОН Банка, а не всей группы Ozon. Однако банковские сервисы тесно интегрированы в э…
👋 Приветственные сообщения
В Beta-версии Telegram для Android 12.10 администраторы смогут добавлять и редактировать приветственные сообщения в группах и каналах.
💭 После присоединения пользователю покажут эфемерное сообщение, которое видит только он. Для остальных участников оно полностью невидимо.
❓ Одним из возможных минусов функции может стать её злоупотребление различными проектами. Сейчас приветственные сообщ…
🧹 Проявите креативность
Telegram запустил свой первый IRL-челлендж — «реальную модерацию», в котором пользователям предлагают навести порядок в реальном мире, а не в приложении.
➕ Участникам нужно выбрать место в своём районе, которое давно нуждается в уборке: очистить парк от мусора, помочь соседу подстричь газон или сделать что-то ещё полезное для окружающих.
📸 Опубликуйте фото «до» и «после» в комментариях к по…
🔍 Обновление Telescan
Переделали партнёрскую программу: платим больше и теперь с трёх уровней.
Было 15% с пополнений тех, кого вы привели. Стало 35% - и это только первый уровень. Дальше глубже: 15% с пополнений тех, кого привели уже ваши рефералы, и 10% с их рефералов. Проценты считаются от полной суммы пополнения и друг у друга ничего не отнимают.
Как это выглядит на практике. Вы привели человека, он пополнил ба…
😱 Из-за 16 900 рублей
Верховный суд объяснил, почему партию «Яблоко» сняли с выборов в Госдуму. Среди претензий — 16 900 рублей, полученных от людей, которых суд связал с финансированием из-за рубежа.
💭 Партии вменили нарушения авторских прав: в агитационных материалах нашли чужие фотографии, изображения и элементы дизайна. Кроме того, в деле фигурировали материалы в поддержку партии, которые распространялись через…
🔍 Обновление Telescan
Добавлена команда /username
Применений масса:
1) Вы знаете юзернейм, который был у человека когда-то, но он его уже сменил, а вы очень хотите зайти в профиль. Бот найдет этот аккаунт и выдаст актуальную ссылку.
2) Вы знаете юзернейм, допустим, с Fragment и хотите проверить, у скольких человек он был. Бот покажет всю историю конкретного юзернейма - сколько аккаунтов его носило и в течение как…
🏆 Охота на победителей олимпиады
Павел Дуров поообещал победителям олимпиады по ИИ NFT-кубки в Telegram. И некоторые уже решили не ждать их вручения — победителям начали писать с предложениями купить награду.
⏱ Эти дети три года шли к олимпиаде. 465 участников из 105 стран, два тура ML-задач, недосып, отборы, пересдачи. Ребята выиграли — и через сутки, в 3 часа ночи, им в почту падает: «хочу приобрести NFT-кубок, п…
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @TeleScanOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 64,340 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🕵️ Telescan вещает” (@TeleScanOfficial), 107,708 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TeleScanOfficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
