Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تطبيقات ذكاء اصطناعي

Channel

تطبيقات ذكاء اصطناعي

@TAWFIQ1_TG

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

10,847subscribers

+632 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004427512319
TypeChannel
Username@TAWFIQ1_TG
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 3 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TAWFIQ1_TG

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

7,780 average views per post against 10,809 subscribers — an engagement rate of 72.0%. Across the 4,902 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,616 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.82% and 14.5%, with a median of 7.18%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (19 July 2026 18 August 2026)
Posts measured34 of 34 published in the window (0 exact, 34 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled264,670
Mature posts only78.7% over 30 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers10,809 measured 17 August 2026
Cohortb10000:ara · 4,902 channels · p10 0.981% · p25 2.82% · p50 7.18% · p75 14.5% · p90 25.0%
Position in cohort99.204th percentile · 10.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.031% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 18 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

10,21510,84710,5318 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,309 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,401 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,493 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,550 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,596 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,568 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,653 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,763 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,809 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,847 subscribers8 August 202618 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +632. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,120–10,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 16:0910,847+38
17 Aug 2026, 18:4310,809+46
16 Aug 2026, 16:1610,763+110
15 Aug 2026, 02:5310,653+85
13 Aug 2026, 17:5910,568-28
12 Aug 2026, 18:0310,596+46
11 Aug 2026, 17:2210,550+57
10 Aug 2026, 18:0510,493+92
9 Aug 2026, 19:5110,401+92
8 Aug 2026, 16:3810,309+94
8 Aug 2026, 01:0210,215first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.1%
avg views ÷ 10,847 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,820
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held44 (3 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total265,910
Reactions total5,050
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,859 reactions across 43 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,80765.0%
🔥83114.2%
👍4397.49%
❤‍🔥3956.74%
👎1963.35%
💯1913.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,859reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC≈2,660 views327 reactionsread 18 August 2026

نزولآ عند رغبة الاخوة الكرام سيتم اصدار تطبيق chat gpt لجميع المعالجات وجميع الاصدارات القديمة والحديثة وحتى التابلت

236🔥34❤‍🔥25👎18💯14

16 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC≈2,920 views194 reactionsread 18 August 2026

تصلنا العديد من الطلبات من الإخوة لتعديل تطبيقات يمنية أو مصرية أو سورية أو تطبيقات عربية بصفة عامة وهنا نود التوضيح أن فريقنا يرفض رفضا قاطعا إجراء أي تعديلات على التطبيقات العربية ورغم أن جميع التطبيقات التي أخضعناها للاختبار كانت تعاني من ضعف شديد في بنيتها الأمنية بما فيها تلك المرتبطة بخدمات سحابية والتي نجحنا في تعديلها والاتصال بخدماتها بنجاح تام إلا أن عملنا هذا اقتصر على الفحص والاختبار الأمني البحت كما تمك

148👍20💯11🔥9👎6

15 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈3,340 views113 reactionsread 18 August 2026

طلب واحد وانشاء 10 صور دفعة واحدة

78❤‍🔥12🔥10💯7👎6

15 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈3,290 views72 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

هذا المعرض

53👎6💯6🔥6❤‍🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC≈3,400 views112 reactionsread 18 August 2026

امكانية طلب تصميم 30 صورة في الطلب الواحد ويرسلهم لكم ملف مضغوط او ملف pdf ينفع للمعلمين وللطلبة هذي تجربة تم طلب شهائد تكريم للطلاب وتم ارفاق اسماء الطلاب ونتائج والبيانات وترتيب معا شعار المدرسة وتم عمل كل الشهائد في ملف مضغوط بصيغة png او ملف pdf مثل ما تشاهدو حملو اللي تريدو ما عاد تحتاج تصمم على صورة صورة

84❤‍🔥11💯9👎5🔥3

15 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC≈3,220 views68 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥479👎6💯3🔥3

15 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC≈3,320 views132 reactionsread 18 August 2026

النسخة الاولة انا وقفتها اعتذر منكم عشان التحديث الجديد طبعآ خلال 3 ايام فقط بنزل الاصدار الجديد اخر اصدار

82🔥24👍14👎9💯3

15 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC≈3,400 views124 reactionsread 18 August 2026

جربو رفع الملفات ورفع الصور في النسخة اللي لديكم الرسمية شوفو كم بتسوي عشان نعرف الفارق لان النسخة هذي فارقة بشكل كبير لا قيود ولاتوقف للرفع او التحميل المميزات الجديدة يسوي صور ويرفع ملفات حتى لو ظهر يرجى الترقية او نفدت حصتك او الرجوع غدآ كل هذا الكلام كان سابقآ يتوقف الان بدون توقف حتى لو ظهرت والحمدلله لقد ازلتها ولن تظهر ولاكن اذا ظهرت مجددآ بيتم عمل صور ورفع ملفات او صور بدون توقف بيتم نشرها قريب خلصتها الحمد

84🔥20👍8❤‍🔥6👎6

15 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC≈3,310 views36 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

جربو رفع الملفات ورفع الصور في النسخة اللي لديكم الرسمية لان النسخة هذي فارقة بشكل كبير لا قيود ولاتوقف للرفع او التحميل بيتم نشرها قريب خلصتها الحمدلله

31🔥5

14 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC≈3,710 views107 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

لم ننسى تفعيل التفكير العميق

63🔥27❤‍🔥8👍7💯2

14 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC≈3,650 views148 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

نركز في رسالة السرفر بعد كل عملية رفع وهية الترقية ونشوف كيف بيتم تخطي رسالة السرفر ورسالة الرجوع غدآ رفع صور حتى 70 صور او ملف ولعوها ناااااااار ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

103🔥24👍9❤‍🔥6💯6

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @TAWFIQ1_TG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@TAWFIQ1_TG edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 873,801 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تطبيقات ذكاء اصطناعي” (@TAWFIQ1_TG), 10,847 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TAWFIQ1_TG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.