Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SYONNEST.

Channel

SYONNEST.

@Syonnest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,320subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004449416568
TypeChannel
Username@Syonnest
DescriptionWe promised forever, 𝘣𝘶𝘵.. ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ࿔‧ ֶָ֢🪽Our faded memories ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎shall rest herein: @Syonnestion. The tattered guestbook awaits thee at @Sfsyonnestbot (𝘚𝘧𝘴 & 𝘏𝘧𝘸) 𓍼ོ Petals in Prose @Syonnestbot.
First recorded14 November 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Syonnest

Growth

1,32014 Nov 2026, 16:47 — 1,320 subscribers14 Nov 2026, 17:22 — 1,320 subscribers14 Nov 2026, 16:4714 Nov 2026, 17:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,319–1,321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 17:221,320no change
14 Nov 2026, 16:471,320first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 1,320 subscribers
Avg views / post
140
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held20 (13 November 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total2,791
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Videos
1
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5451714942157724312523.8%
custom 5449692618151695997419.0%
custom 5276492873620021661314.3%
custom 5350546918780974210314.3%
custom 526958045446957988729.52%
custom 581911998239447893129.52%
custom 525843264351451754814.76%
custom 530994907542298494614.76%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC52 views4 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Hengpi 1.3K Cones 🙀

custom 52695804544695798872custom 53099490754229849461custom 53505469187809742101

14 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC143 viewsread 14 November 2026

SFS SFS SFS KAMI LAPAR SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFS LAPAAAAARRRRRRRRRR

14 Nov 2026, 08:31 UTC208 viewsread 14 November 2026

Cones kita Sungchan Wonbin ya, terharu nih disebut mbar sama dd 09L 🤭

14 Nov 2026, 07:44 UTC147 views3 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @BinnievillePhoto

ᅟᅟ 💧 binniéville is calling all pretty 𝚍𝚘𝚕𝚕𝚜.. ♡ to enter 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘦! ❀ <,333 a constellation of unfamiliar faces, 𝚜.𝚘.𝚘.𝚗 to become 𝘧𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘴. (⭐️🩷🫖🛏) perhaps your story belongs among ours. 📮 💌 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘭𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘦 awaits your arrival! °୭‌•

custom 54517149421577243122custom 52584326435145175481

13 Nov 2026, 18:08 UTC288 viewsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @mistleean

〔 ethereal reverie .. 〕beneath the silver moonlight, wandering souls find their way through the mist, leaving little traces of themselves in the quiet beyond. taking a brief pause between dreams to celebrate @leeanthine @eominlove @SahrOfJyu @wonelys @kyastle @ANTORELLI @Hanisphere @SEANMONTIR @DUNKSEAN @Syonnest @aimeeian. happy mensive, dreamers! glad to have crossed paths with you in this ethereal realm and every …

13 Nov 2026, 18:07 UTC260 viewsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @ROMCORT

ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤ PRAY, DRAW NEAR, AND ㅤㅤ LINGER 4 A WHILE ㅤ ㅤ 2OO8: 📽.ᐟ ☎️💬 ㅤ 𓋜𝘯 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 an evening 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴, ㅤ Familiar Souls Find #1 Another ㅤ 𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘴𝘵 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 ㅤ 📮 ㅤ encounters 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘦𝘵𝘭𝘺 CHΞЯiSH. ㅤ $0.00 Gentle Mirth, +discourse ㅤ 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 ㅤ *️⃣ woven worthy ㅤ rembrance .. *( keeping moment 🔑 𓂃 𓈒𓏸 𝓐s @Le…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Syonnest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SYONNEST.” (@Syonnest), 1,320 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Syonnest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.