Channel
@Streamex_HQ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,779subscribers
-47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003747661737 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Streamex_HQ |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 16 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Streamex_HQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 2,779 | -22 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:39 | 2,801 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 2,814 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 2,823 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 2,826 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 May 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 131 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
84 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 67.9% | |
| custom 5228882418114532317 | 27 | 32.1% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Streamex_HQ. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 May 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Kori Handy, our VP of Product and Design, sat down to talk through where Streamex is going and why we are building it this way. The framing is simple. Gold is the first asset 💰 Trust is the product ⤴️ ⤴️ Discover Streamex ⤴️
❤2
Gold ETF Weekly Flow Watch ❤️ Gold ETF flows turned positive this week, with buying back across most major regions. 🌎North America: +0.8 tonnes 🌍Europe: +1.2 tonnes 🌏Asia: -0.2 tonnes 🌐Other: +0.9 tonnes Total weekly flow: +2.6 tonnes Europe led the buying and North America joined in. Asia was the only region still trimming, and barely. That's a shift from recent months, when North America was the heaviest seller…
❤4
Streamex Corp. (NASDAQ:$STEX) has authorized a new share repurchase program for up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock. The program reflects the board's confidence in the Company's long-term trajectory and its view that the current stock price does not reflect the infrastructure Streamex has built 💰 Repurchases may be made at up to $2.00 per share over the next 12 months. GLDY is live, yield-bearing, independently…
Verified ✅ GLDY's first independent reserve attestation is complete. Eisner Amper LLP has examined GLDY's gold reserves as of March 31, 2026. Total gold holdings meet or exceed 100% of all GLDY tokens outstanding. Unmodified opinion. 3,064.674268 tokens outstanding. 3,064.915910 fine troy ounces of gold in reserve. This is the first of what will be monthly attestations. ⤴️ Discover Streamex ⤴️
❤2custom 52288824181145323172
Streamex, Siebert Financial, and tZERO have formalized a collaboration to bring GLDY into traditional brokerage distribution 💰 Siebert Financial wealth management and institutional clients can now access GLDY through their existing brokerage relationship. A licensed Siebert broker offers GLDY the same way they offer any other investment. GLDY is gold-backed, yield-bearing, and targets up to 3.5% APY paid in additio…
❤3custom 52288824181145323173
💰Gold ETF Flow Watch 💰 Gold ETF flows posted net inflows this week, with Western markets leading and Asia pulling back. 🌎 North America: +2.6 tonnes 🌍 Europe: +3.7 tonnes 🌏 Asia: -0.4 tonnes 🌐 Other: -0.7 tonnes Total weekly flow: +5.1 tonnes Western institutional demand stayed firm. The geographic split is worth watching, North America and Europe are carrying the flow while Asian markets pulled back slightly. ⤴…
❤2custom 52288824181145323172
GLDY holders just got paid in gold again🥇 8.946 oz of gold paid directly to #GLDY holders this month. 3.5% annualized yield, denominated in gold. The leasing program is scaling, liquidity is deepening, and GLDY is becoming what it was built to be, a long-term income-generating alternative to traditional gold holding.
❤1custom 52288824181145323171
Men only want one thing and it's disgusting
custom 52288824181145323173❤2
Global gold demand hit $193B in Q1 2026, a record quarterly value 💰 Physically backed gold ETFs added $6.6B in April alone, even after March outflows. The numbers reflect something structural. Institutions are building gold back into their core allocation stack. ETFs were the infrastructure shift that opened gold to institutional capital. They removed the custody friction, storage costs, and counterparty risk tha…
The $135T commodity market still runs on legacy rails 🥇 Streamex built the institutional-grade infrastructure to tokenize commodities at scale. In recent months, we've: → Launched GLDY, a yield-bearing gold token → Distributed 10.48 oz of gold in yield → Formed partnerships with Chainlink and the Solana Policy Institute → Launched a 24/7 secondary market on Orca The platform is live and working. Next up: ⤴️ Wint…
❤18custom 52288824181145323175
Two years ago, tokenized RWAs were a thesis. Today it's a $27 billion market. -Tokenized commodities onchain today: $7B 🔗 -Gold addressable market: $31T 💰 -Oil & Gas addressable market: $8.75T 🛢 -Total commodities market: $135T ❗️ $7 billion onchain against a $135 trillion total market. That's an entire frontier that hasn't been touched yet. Gold alone represents $31T in addressable market. A fraction of a perc…
❤3custom 52288824181145323171
Gold isn't getting more expensive. 💰 The truth is: The purchasing power of fiat currencies is declining relative to gold. Since 2000, the US dollar has lost 93.9% of its value in gold terms. EUR lost 92.9%. In 2025 alone, major fiat currencies lost an average of 35.9% against gold. Worth asking what asset you are measuring your wealth against. ⤴️ Discover Streamex ⤴️
❤6custom 52288824181145323171
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Streamex_HQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,127,158 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Streamex” (@Streamex_HQ), 2,779 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Streamex_HQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.