Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stock Market Tak

Channel

Stock Market Tak

@Stock_Market_Tak

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,477subscribers

-65 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001307970276
TypeChannel
Username@Stock_Market_Tak
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Stock_Market_Tak

Growth

9,4779,5609,518.514 August 2026 — 9,542 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,546 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,556 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,560 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,547 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,544 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,525 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,505 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,477 subscribers14 August 202610 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 27 days, net -65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,465–9,572 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 03:019,477-28
4 Sept 2026, 17:569,505-20
1 Sept 2026, 06:369,525-19
29 Aug 2026, 02:139,544-3
26 Aug 2026, 02:129,547-13
22 Aug 2026, 17:459,560+4
18 Aug 2026, 23:179,556+10
15 Aug 2026, 18:399,546+4
14 Aug 2026, 14:169,542first reading

Engagement

127 posts held, back to 12 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.40%
avg views ÷ 9,477 subscribers
Avg views / post
890
127 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.303%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
127
of 127 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 83 of 127 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held127 (12 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total113,077
Reactions total222
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 81 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8036.0%
👍7433.3%
🔥2410.8%
👎177.66%
😭146.31%
🤬52.25%
🎉20.901%
🤡20.901%
🤷‍♀20.901%
🥰20.901%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 127 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC828 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Anchor Book 📖 ESDS Software Solution Ltd IPO Decent to Good Anchors Domestic Funds are most Interested A total of 19 Names are present and size is around ₹216 Cr Investors Present: ▪︎ Motilal Oswal MF ▪︎ Bandhan MF ▪︎ Quant MF ▪︎ ITI MF ▪︎ Sanshi Fund (Mukul Agrawal) ▪︎ Meru Investment Fund ▪︎ JM Financial MF ▪︎ Bajaj General Insurance ▪︎ Cognizant Capital Fund ▪︎ Samco MF ▪︎ CP Capital Ltd (Pramod Maheshwari) 8

2

27 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC845 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Augmont Enterprises IPO Allotment Status Out https://in.mpms.mufg.com/Initial_Offer/public-issues.html

👎8🤬3

27 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC886 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Superstar Investors Are Betting on These Recent IPO Upcoming IPOs 1. ESDS Software Solution 🔸Mukul Agrawal Holding Stake: 6.99% 🔸Ashish Kacholia Holding Stake: 2.39% 2. Purple Style Labs 🔸Mukul Agrawal Holding Stake: 1.42% 🔸Singularity Growth Opportunities Fund I (Madhusudan Kela-backed) Holding Stake: 1.93% 🔸Volrado Venture Partners Fund II (Akash Bhanshali-backed) Holding Stake: 2.90% Recently Listed Companies

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @Stock_Market_Tak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Share Market Talks®
@Share_Market_Talks1 · 30,333
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 7 September 2026
Knowledge Jazz
@knowledgejazzchannel · 60,791
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
The Wealth Magnet
@TheWealthMagnet · 113,231
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
STOCK MARKET ADDA ️
@stock_market_addaa · 59,075
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
Help Of Stock Market
@helpofstockmarket77 · 28,827
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stock Market Tak” (@Stock_Market_Tak), 9,477 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stock_Market_Tak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.