MegaETH 确定 TGE 时间了,大卡车
👎7👍1
Signed xiaohai

Channel
@StarsOnChain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,736subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001875205924 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @StarsOnChain |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/StarsOnChain |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 2,736 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 2,745 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:39 | 2,745 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
76 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 43.4% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 11.8% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 10.5% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 10.5% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 9.21% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 5.26% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 5.26% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 3.95% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 24 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
MegaETH 确定 TGE 时间了,大卡车
👎7👍1
Signed xiaohai
剩下的可以领了,原链接,发财。
❤6
Signed xiaohai
Bitget 价格稳定在 650,平价开盘, Gate 上的东西不是一个东西。 这个事情,从 Bitget 角度上看肯定是赚的,赚了交易所 inflow + 手续费 + 卖早期投资份额的 Carry 苦了被耍猴的「VIP」们呜呜哭唧唧。 后续怎么样不知道,如果视作投机,到此就结束了,至少 Bitget 没让亏钱。如果是冲着想在正股 IPO 前买点 SpaceX 的筹码,至少提供了个渠道,价格是 1.5T,至于资产合规方面的担忧,可以看这个: https://x.com/JianzhiJin/status/2045779499745456508
❤2
Signed xiaohai
SpaceX 的两个交易所打新,不是理财,也不是不能参加,心态摆正,愿赌服输罢了。 虽然 Gate 有盘前,但是没什么交易量,不具有参考价值。
👏9
Signed xiaohai
最近好多 STRC 的封装项目,例如 sUSDat。 sUSDat 封装的是 STRC 本身,自带 11.5% 的年化分红,分红来自 STRC 优先股本身。因此,许多人担心的 STRC 的下行风险,sUSDat 是要承担的。 这个模式有点像你持有 Ondo 发行的代币化证券,核心优势是不用 KYC 和税务,除此之外不知道有啥必要不想持有正股,除非你懒挪钱和空投预期(有积分)。 这些项目后面储备报告肯定要有的,现在没说的很清楚。 投资机构这边有 YZI LAB,不过 YZI LAB 的项目投资,毕竟是风投,失败率很高,辩证看待。 感觉这些项目最大的作用就是用空投预期给 STRC 创造买盘,提供资金,给 BTC 输血,善哉。
❤7😁1
Signed xiaohai
这部分平仓了。
🥰2
Signed xiaohai
注意风险,现在 USD1 看好和不看好的吵的有点凶~ https://x.com/BitHappy/status/2041738657166672362?s=20
Signed xiaohai
帮助回忆一下: 当年 Curve 就是通过类似的操作,把自家的代币去抵押,然后借出稳定币。最终因为 CRV 的价格下跌,导致仓位被清算,对币价引发了巨大的抛压螺旋。 这里面有几个机会可以留意: 1. 关注价格和这个地址的健康度。 2. 如果你要去吃这个利息的话,其实蛮危险的,因为你不确定他们的具体意图。如果是这种变相套现的方式,有可能受到坏账影响。 另外,Dolomite 的 CTO 和 WLFI 的是同一个人 😂
😁5
Signed xiaohai
从最近的 Resolv,到今天的 Drift 被盗,熊市的黑客潮如期而至,当然牛市也不少。 与之相比最大的感受是:熊市身边受影响群友很少,一方面可能是这些协议留下来的大部分是机构的钱,另一方面是「懒人」的钱。
😢4
Signed xiaohai
我在 @coinkarma_ 监控的第四个 BTC 买点昨晚出现了,如果你有囤币计划,不妨参考一下,我继续囤了一点。 我监控的条件是:除了整体市场买卖盘流动性差别够大之外,核心共振指标是:价格上下 10% 的全市场买盘必须大于卖盘 5000 个 BTC。 不过值得注意的是,指标是模糊正确,所以这里不是梭哈位,永远也不存在梭哈位; 其次也不是绝对底部买点,从第三次买点中明显可见,仍有下跌空间; 最后,这里是监控计算的是挂单,意味着大家已经交出来在牌桌的筹码,如果某个大户一把市价砸盘,仍会使指标实效。
❤12👍1
Signed xiaohai
到账了
❤5
Signed xiaohai
https://x.com/Backpack/status/2035950357877334109 backpack 空投查询
❤1
Signed xiaohai
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @StarsOnChain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@StarsOnChain named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“链上星光” (@StarsOnChain), 2,736 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StarsOnChain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.