Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Squid Gambles

Channel

Squid Gambles

@SquidGambles

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,175subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001740207435
TypeChannel
Username@SquidGambles
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SquidGambles

Growth

1,1751,1791,1777 August 2026 — 1,179 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,177 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,176 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,175 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,174–1,180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:361,175-1
10 Aug 2026, 11:231,176-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:421,177-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:451,179first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.4%
avg views ÷ 1,175 subscribers
Avg views / post
452
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 March 20244 August 2026)
Views total1,807
Reactions total29
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

451 reactions across 19 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14632.4%
12427.5%
👀286.21%
🤣275.99%
😁204.43%
👍194.21%
🤯122.66%
🤩112.44%
🍾81.77%
🤡71.55%
❤‍🔥61.33%
💩61.33%
🖕61.33%
40.887%
💯40.887%
🍌30.665%
👏30.665%
🏆20.443%
🐳20.443%
👎20.443%
9 further kinds112.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 451reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2024 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC422 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

tg banned my account for no reason back in 2021, now I banned them from the apple store, trust

👍4🤣1🤯1

28 Jul 2026, 20:23 UTC498 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Lol, make sure to leave old small groups. Some random ass group from 2022 called Sol Anal, the owner left and I automatically randomly got transferred owner. Now I have to deal with a copyright strike?

😁101

28 Jul 2026, 20:23 UTC441 viewsread 7 August 2026

Hello, this is Telegram Support. Representatives of Coinbase, Layer Zero, Tools for Humanity, Phantom, Galxe, Kraken, Trip Advisor and Backpack Exchange made a complaint https://t.me/solanalbsc is infringing on their copyright. We kindly ask you to contact the copyright holder via email [email protected] to resolve the matter.

9 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC705 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Not getting paid to post this btw, just wanted to drop a lil stimmy for squiggas. The bot is genuinely useful and if you like it, I'll giveaway what I get from refs. Never sold out and never will, I don't need to

14

9 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTC662 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

$1000 giveaway, read below squiggas I've been using this bot and it works multichain, without bridging. U can deposit SOL, for example, and buy on ETH or Robinhood, etc. Saves you from fading when new chains pop up and you're lazy to bridge. Very cool tech. Also, gas fees are free. Use my ref and respond with "done". I'll randomly give 50 of you $20, but first I will check if you actually signed up lol, might ta

21🖕6💩2🤡2

11 May 2026, 21:47 UTC≈1,380 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hachiko is still going strong. Almost hit 4 mil today. Got entry on the weekend dips and still holding my bags. Feels good to have a longterm BSC hold.

🔥287💯4❤‍🔥3🐳21🌚1🏆1

16 Apr 2026, 19:40 UTC≈1,200 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Maybe should've saved this for the bullrun instead, but some might find it useful https://x.com/0xFrontman/status/2044862610458497193

🔥8👏32🤝1

18 Mar 2026, 15:58 UTC≈1,410 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Devs are delivering, new tech yesterday, buybacks and burns, donations are going out. Good chance to dca, or get an entry. Also something that people failed to notice, is that the giving block (the crypto payment platform for nonprofits) is actively engaging with them, so maybe they get some good partnerships soon Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/9uwcgxdy7zvkq5zywf5h11t3opvd5cy2xufthjq2new3

6

12 Mar 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,630 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bitrock dev just launched, previous project did 1500x for us. Catch whatever entry you want, I don't want to wait for a dip to share X: https://x.com/unigivetoken CA: CkJgoT1YcPqWdjUbvqgPf5BDwvq2GeBX7REG9TCCpump

7👍2

16 Feb 2026, 07:02 UTC≈2,190 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Will look for an entry here on this weekend dip on Hachiko. The community and dev reminds me of the 2021 bullrun type and its on BSC. I legit haven't seen so many legit retail moonboys in a single coin since back then They're tryna be the next shib, but on BSC. Let's see how BSC treats us Chart: https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0xe6edc555061d1d9fe0145867b7ea7b07da840898 TG: https://t.me/hachiko_bnb_chat

🔥3373❤‍🔥2🤩2😁2🏆1😇1

24 Nov 2025, 18:20 UTC≈1,640 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Monad has been goood for us, we printed today in the lounge. Early to everything. I kicked some inactives, 5 people can join. Here: https://t.me/+mamTP82CM5w1NjA0 Also, follow me on X: https://x.com/0xFrontman

10

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SquidGambles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 864,056 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Squid Gambles” (@SquidGambles), 1,175 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SquidGambles.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.