Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Spider Boxes πŸ•·

Channel

Spider Boxes πŸ•·

@Spider_Boxes

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

3,212subscribers

-64 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002834118152
TypeChannel
Username@Spider_Boxes
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Spider_Boxes

Growth

3,2123,2763,2447 August 2026 β€” 3,276 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 3,275 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 3,256 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 3,236 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 3,212 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,202–3,286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 18:183,212-24
14 Aug 2026, 13:243,236-20
10 Aug 2026, 22:483,256-19
7 Aug 2026, 23:253,275-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:173,276first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
11.7%
avg views Γ· 3,212 subscribers
Avg views / post
375
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.25%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total7,491
Reactions total468
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

468 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀25253.8%
πŸ‘9019.2%
πŸ”₯4910.5%
πŸ₯°183.85%
😁122.56%
😍112.35%
❀‍πŸ”₯102.14%
πŸ‘61.28%
πŸ€—61.28%
πŸ•Š40.855%
πŸŽ‰30.641%
⚑20.427%
πŸ’―20.427%
😎20.427%
😱10.214%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 468reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC62 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❀‍πŸ”₯1😎1

Signed Inside Ads

7 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC91 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❀1πŸ•Š1

Signed Inside Ads

7 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC107 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

πŸ₯°2❀1😎1

Signed Inside Ads

4 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC280 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

πŸš€ Big Update for Our Community! Hello Friends! I know I haven't been posting Red Packets recently because I've been building something much bigger. πŸ”₯ MNB Marketplace is coming soon! What will you be able to do? β˜‘οΈ Buy & Sell almost anything: β€’ AI Prompts β€’ Courses β€’ Source Code β€’ Telegram Channels & Bots β€’ Websites & Apps β€’ Domains β€’ Digital Services β€’ Mobile Phones β€’ Electronics β€’ Clothes β€’ Health Products And much …

❀5❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ”₯3😍1

2 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC246 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ClaudeAgentOfficialPhoto

πŸ’«Promo Code is LIVE! Use the code Y7LRK2R6 to claim your exclusive reward! πŸš€ πŸ€–Bot: @CATokenAirdropBot ⏳ Limited time only β€” redeem it before it expires! #ClaudeAgent #ViralSoon #PromoCode

πŸ€—6❀2😱1

31 Jul 2026, 01:01 UTC426 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⭐️JOIN LOTTERY, TRY LUCK❀️

❀7πŸ”₯2πŸ₯°2

30 Jul 2026, 04:38 UTC528 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Alpha_Muneeb sent you a Red Packet. Tap the link to claim now! https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/4rhX7dkZ?utm_medium=web_share_copy

❀32πŸ”₯9πŸ‘6❀‍πŸ”₯3😁2

30 Jul 2026, 04:12 UTC513 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

SHIB➑️ J3X4V3N2

❀25πŸ‘12πŸ₯°3

30 Jul 2026, 04:10 UTC521 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

BONK➑️ W1L42291

❀26πŸ‘10⚑2😁1

30 Jul 2026, 04:00 UTC498 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

DOGE➑️ EPR0ZUNJ

πŸ”₯19πŸ‘10❀6πŸ‘2

30 Jul 2026, 03:56 UTC517 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Alpha_Muneeb sent you a Red Packet. Tap the link to claim now! https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/9sryqxGg?utm_medium=web_share_copy

❀30πŸ‘11πŸ”₯4πŸ₯°2😁1

29 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC426 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❀️‍πŸ”₯ 𝗙𝗔𝗦𝗧 𝗛𝗒𝗧 𝗕𝗒𝗫 ❀️‍πŸ”₯ ╔══════════════╗ 🎁 π—π—’π—œπ—‘ 𝗑𝗒π—ͺ 🎁 β•šβ•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•β•

❀9πŸ”₯2😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Spider_Boxes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œSpider Boxes πŸ•·β€ (@Spider_Boxes), 3,212 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Spider_Boxes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.