Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for S.Herlock Group | #intelligence

Channel

S.Herlock Group | #intelligence

@Sherlockintelligence

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,701subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002168039659
TypeChannel
Username@Sherlockintelligence
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sherlockintelligence

Growth

1,7011,7191,7107 August 2026 — 1,719 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,719 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,718 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,713 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,711 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,709 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,706 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,703 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,701 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,698–1,722 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 23:041,701-2
24 Aug 2026, 22:181,703-3
21 Aug 2026, 08:351,706-3
18 Aug 2026, 00:121,709-2
14 Aug 2026, 21:041,711-2
11 Aug 2026, 15:171,713-5
8 Aug 2026, 05:131,718-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:331,719no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:241,719first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 30 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

196 reactions across 15 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣6332.1%
3316.8%
🌭147.14%
🤡147.14%
😍105.10%
💩94.59%
🔥94.59%
😢84.08%
👻63.06%
🍾52.55%
🥱52.55%
🤪42.04%
31.53%
👏31.53%
🖕31.53%
21.02%
🤔21.02%
👍10.51%
👎10.51%
🥰10.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 September 2025 to 14 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
53
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sherlockintelligence. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 September 2025 to 14 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Oct 2025, 04:35 UTC≈3,230 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵‍♂Defacement en Chaco: “PWNED BY LUISITO” • El portal puertobarranqueras.chaco.gob.ar/es/ fue intervenido con un defacement firmado como “PWNED BY LUISITO”. • La página mostraba mensajes como “HACKED!”, “LOL”, “Cyber” y referencias a “Security”. • Nuevo incidente que expone vulnerabilidades en la infraestructura digital de sitios gubernamentales argentinos. https://t.me/Sherlockintelligence

🤡148👻5🍾4🤣2👎1

13 Oct 2025, 01:53 UTC≈2,920 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵‍♂Filtración masiva en Telegram • Circulan archivos que supuestamente contienen datos de más de mil millones de usuarios de Telegram. • El material se comparte en canales y foros clandestinos en formato comprimido, con varios GB de información. • Aún no se confirma la autenticidad total, pero la magnitud del caso genera alarma sobre la seguridad de la plataforma. https://t.me/Sherlockintelligence.

😢83🖕3🍾1

13 Oct 2025, 01:48 UTC≈2,350 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵‍♂Criminales intentan reclutar a periodista de la BBC • Un grupo de ransomware contactó a un corresponsal de la BBC ofreciéndole entre el 15 % y 25 % de un rescate si actuaba como insider. • El objetivo era acceder a los sistemas internos de la cadena y facilitar un ataque desde adentro. • El caso refleja la creciente táctica de reclutar empleados para intrusiones y extorsiones digitales. https://t.me/Sherlockintel

1

13 Oct 2025, 01:46 UTC≈2,190 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵‍♂FBI desmantela BreachForums • Autoridades internacionales confiscaron los dominios de BreachForums, un mercado criminal usado para traficar datos robados y facilitar extorsiones. • La operación apuntó a grupos como ShinyHunters, Baphomet e IntelBroker, eliminando un centro clave para monetizar intrusiones y reclutar colaboradores. • El golpe evidencia la cooperación global entre fuerzas de seguridad para frenar el

👏2

11 Oct 2025, 01:52 UTC≈1,970 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🕵‍♂Comunicado Oficial – SherlockGroup Ante recientes publicaciones periodísticas que mencionan el nombre de nuestro bot, queremos dejar en claro lo siguiente: • Sherlock no tiene relación alguna con el caso difundido en medios sobre el acceso indebido a bases de datos oficiales. • Nuestra plataforma no promueve, fomenta ni respalda actividades ilícitas. Está diseñada con fines de investigación, concientización y edu

🤣47🌭11🔥51👻1

11 Oct 2025, 01:51 UTC≈1,820 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵‍♂Adolescente acusado de hackear Registro de las Personas con bot Sherlock • Un joven de 16 años de Pontevedra fue acusado de acceder ilegalmente a la base de datos del Registro de las Personas bonaerense y filtrar millones de registros. • Según la investigación, habría usado el bot Sherlock para obtener credenciales comprometidas y luego subir la información a un foro clandestino. • El juez Ricardo Costa ordenó el

🤣11🌭3🔥31👏1

9 Oct 2025, 04:42 UTC≈1,730 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵‍♂Hackean portal de noticias en Entre Ríos • Sitio web de El Entre Ríos fue vulnerado y reemplazado con mensajes ofensivos contra la policía • El ataque fue firmado por el grupo “t.me/s7aake” junto a seudónimos como Taponero1337 e Indoxeable1337 • El defacement incluyó imágenes y consignas de burla, afectando la portada principal del medio https://t.me/Sherlockintelligence

💩9🤪4

7 Oct 2025, 19:13 UTC≈1,760 views2 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵‍♂Comet Browser bajo la lupa • Se promociona como un navegador con IA, pero investigadores detectaron vulnerabilidades graves. • Puede ser manipulado para robar cookies, correos y credenciales de Discord mediante ataques como CometJacking. • No es un virus clásico, pero funciona como vector de robo de datos y phishing avanzado. https://t.me/Sherlockintelligence

1🥰1

6 Oct 2025, 17:06 UTC≈1,680 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵‍♂Credenciales expuestas de la Policía de Neuquén • En un foro clandestino publicaron más de 20 accesos pertenecientes a sistemas oficiales de la Policía de la Provincia de Neuquén. • Entre los dominios afectados figuran: au.polneuquen.gob.ar, sice.polneuquen.gob.ar, educa.polneuquen.gob.ar y correo.polneuquen.gob.ar. • Las credenciales incluyen usuarios de correo, educación y sistemas administrativos internos. htt

4

6 Oct 2025, 17:04 UTC≈1,500 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵‍♂Explotan vulnerabilidad en MiANSES • Un usuario de foros clandestinos compartió un script en Python que aprovecha un IDOR en la API de MiANSES. • El código permite consultar datos de CUIT masivamente con solo un usuario válido obtenido de un ULP. • Afirman que gran parte de la población argentina está expuesta, con datos disponibles en el sistema. https://t.me/Sherlockintelligence

3

5 Oct 2025, 17:08 UTC≈1,570 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵‍♂Regalan APK de Volcam Tool para falsear cámara en Android • Circula gratis la versión 3.5.6 rootless (sin necesidad de root). • Permite clonar apps y reemplazar la cámara real por fotos o videos falsos. • Riesgo de uso en fraudes digitales y validaciones de identidad. https://t.me/Sherlockintelligence

😍10🤣31👍1

4 Oct 2025, 21:58 UTC≈1,350 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵‍♂Hackean portal de datos del Ministerio de Salud de Argentina • El sitio oficial datos.salud.gob.ar fue vulnerado y modificado por un actor identificado como Z1k3n. • En la página principal se dejó un mensaje con la firma del atacante y un canal de contacto en Telegram. • El defacement evidencia fallas en la seguridad de plataformas críticas del sector público argentino. https://t.me/Sherlockintelligence

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Sherlockintelligence. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“S.Herlock Group | #intelligence” (@Sherlockintelligence), 1,701 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sherlockintelligence.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.