Engagement
10 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.2%
- avg views ÷ 3,948 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 602
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
6 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC236 viewsread 8 August 2026 Photo
#استنتاج
قوانین استنتاج
بعد از ارسال عکس توسط اعضا کانال
عکس توسط ادمین در کانال به اشتراک گذاشته میشه.
بقیه اعضا نظرشون رو میفرستند
ادمین نظرات رو به شخص فرستندهعکس ارسال میکنه
شخص فرستنده عکس نکات صحیح و غلط استنتاج را مشخص میکند.
یا با علامت👍 برای جمله درست
و یا باعلامت👎 برا جمله منفی
در اخر هم بهترین استنتاج مشخص می شود.
خواهشا رعایتکنید.
دوستان سعی کنند حتی الامکان استنتاج ها رو با دلیل مناسب بفرستند که ب…
Signed 𝐈 𝐀𝐌 🆂🅷🆁 𝐋𝐎𝐂𝐊𝐄𝐃 rezaei
5 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC499 viewsread 8 August 2026 Photo
« اصلاً از شرلوک خوشم نمیآمد. در مدرسه داستان های او را خوانده بودم به نظرم آدمی بود که بیش از حد خودنمایی میکرد و مدام میخواست باهوش بودنش را به رخ بکشد. هیچوقت با او ارتباط برقرار نکرده بودم.»
«وقتی تهیهکنندگان نقش را به من پیشنهاد کردند، با خودم گفتم: "شرلوک هولمز؟ خدای من! این نقش را که صدها بار بازی کردهاند." اصلاً علاقهای به قبول کردنش نداشتم.»
جرمی برت در ادامه می گوید :
بعد تصمیم گرفتم همه داستانهای ک…
Signed 𝐈 𝐀𝐌 🆂🅷🆁 𝐋𝐎𝐂𝐊𝐄𝐃 rezaei
1 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC802 viewsread 8 August 2026 Video
This could have been the end.
Was he really sure John would have shown up?
#Clip | #Sherlock_Benedict
@Sherlocki_Official
Signed KENNETH
30 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC871 viewsread 8 August 2026 #استنتاج
دوستانی که عکس اتاقشونو فرستادند یا تمایل دارند در استنتاج اتاق شرکت کنند به آیدی زیر پیام بدند.
باتشکر
👇ارسال عکس 👇
@Sherlockoficial_admin
@sherlocki_official / #deduction
Signed 𝐈 𝐀𝐌 🆂🅷🆁 𝐋𝐎𝐂𝐊𝐄𝐃 rezaei
25 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 8 August 2026 Video
watch ur best friend suicide...
#Clip | #Sherlock_Benedict
@Sherlocki_Official
Signed KENNETH
24 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 8 August 2026 نتیجه: خودکشی، نه قتل.
دلایل:
اتاق از داخل قفل بوده و هیچ راه خروجی وجود نداشته.
اسلحه متعلق به خود استاد بوده.
روی دستش آثار باروت وجود داره یعنی خودش شلیک کرده است.
هیچ اثر انگشت یا DNA فرد دیگه توی اتاق نیست.
چیزی از گاوصندوق دزدیده نشده؛ پس انگیزهای مثل سرقت وجود نداره.
پس ساعت ۹:۱۷ چیه؟
اکثر افراد فرض میکنن ساعت هنگام شلیک شکسته و زمان مرگ رو نشان مدن.
اما همینجاست که جملهی روی تخته معنا پیدا میکنه…
Signed Riddler
19 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 8 August 2026 Video
YES IT IS YOUR BIRTHDAY!!
#Clip | #Sherlock_Benedict
@Sherlocki_Official
Signed KENNETH
17 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 8 August 2026 Photo
مینی سریال معمایی- هیجانی «شرلوک و دختر» محصول ۲۰۲۵ انگلستان، از بامداد شنبه ۲۷ تیر در ۸ قسمت به روی آنتن شبکه چهار خواهد رفت.
این مینی سریال در ۸ شب متوالی از شنبه، ۲۷ تیر در دقیقه ۵ بامداد از شبکه چهار سیما پخش و در دو نوبت در ساعتهای ۱۱ و ۱۷ همان روز تکرار میشود.
@Sherlocki_Official | #News
Signed 𝐈 𝐀𝐌 🆂🅷🆁 𝐋𝐎𝐂𝐊𝐄𝐃 rezaei
شرلوک هلمز | Sherlock pinned a photo
17 Jul 2026, 06:17 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 8 August 2026 Photo
#استنتاج
قوانین استنتاج
بعد از ارسال عکس توسط اعضا کانال
عکس توسط ادمین در کانال به اشتراک گذاشته میشه.
بقیه اعضا نظرشون رو میفرستند
ادمین نظرات رو به شخص فرستندهعکس ارسال میکنه
شخص فرستنده عکس نکات صحیح و غلط استنتاج را مشخص میکند.
یا با علامت👍 برای جمله درست
و یا باعلامت👎 برا جمله منفی
در اخر هم بهترین استنتاج مشخص می شود.
خواهشا رعایتکنید.
دوستان سعی کنند حتی الامکان استنتاج ها رو با دلیل مناسب بفرستند که ب…
Signed 𝐈 𝐀𝐌 🆂🅷🆁 𝐋𝐎𝐂𝐊𝐄𝐃 rezaei
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Sherlockiiiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 56,312 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شرلوک هلمز | Sherlock” (@Sherlockiiiii), 3,948 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sherlockiiiii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
