Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شهد بلس | Shahad Plus

Channel

شهد بلس | Shahad Plus

@ShahadPlus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,580subscribers

-331 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001375247112
TypeChannel
Username@ShahadPlus
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ShahadPlus

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,58010,91110,745.512 August 2026 — 10,911 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,911 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,900 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,887 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,866 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,857 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,844 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,840 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,838 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,831 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,818 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,805 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,800 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,795 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,788 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,776 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,763 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,755 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,731 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,721 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,712 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,695 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,669 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,647 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,634 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,612 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,595 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,580 subscribers12 August 202618 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 37 days, net -331. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,530–10,961 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 14:3910,580-15
16 Sept 2026, 06:1510,595-17
14 Sept 2026, 10:1810,612-22
12 Sept 2026, 18:2110,634-13
10 Sept 2026, 22:1910,647-22
8 Sept 2026, 00:3610,669-26
5 Sept 2026, 00:5710,695-17
3 Sept 2026, 10:1310,712-9
2 Sept 2026, 07:2810,721-10
1 Sept 2026, 04:1810,731-24
31 Aug 2026, 04:3810,755-8
30 Aug 2026, 05:4410,763-13
29 Aug 2026, 02:5710,776-12
28 Aug 2026, 01:2410,788-7
27 Aug 2026, 00:3410,795-5
25 Aug 2026, 21:2710,800-5
24 Aug 2026, 20:1710,805-13
23 Aug 2026, 05:3810,818-13
21 Aug 2026, 17:2610,831-7
20 Aug 2026, 11:4310,838first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.556%
avg views ÷ 10,580 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.8
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held80 (7 August 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total1,118
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1760.7%
😢414.3%
👏310.7%
😱27.14%
🙏13.57%
🤔13.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 18:50 UTC14 viewsread 1 September 2026

صحفي مقرّب من ترامب يحذّر: استمرار أزمة الشرق الأوسط قد يجعل انتخابات الكونغرس النصفية «قاسية جدًا»على ترامب، مضيفًا: «قد تغضبون مني، لكنني لن أكذب عليكم».

1 Sept 2026, 18:39 UTC10 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @ShahadyasiriPhoto

بدء الرد الايراني

1 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC15 viewsread 1 September 2026

شهود عيان : تمت مشاهدة اطلاق ناري كبير من كرمنشاه تجاه الخليج

31 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC61 viewsread 1 September 2026

ترامب: لا أحد سيهاجمنا. هل تعرفون السبب؟ لأنهم أذكياء.

31 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC74 viewsread 1 September 2026

نائب الرئيس الأمريكي "جيه دي فانس" حول منشور ترامب بتدمير مركز الطاقة الإيرانية في جزيرة خارك: يحب الرئيس تغيير أسلوبه قليلًا على وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي سيكون أول من يقول إنه لا يعلن عن عمليات عسكرية على وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي، لكنني أعتقد أنه يوجه رسالة إلى الإيرانيين.

31 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC75 viewsread 1 September 2026

ترامب : الهدف رقم واحد هو، وسيظل دائماً، ألا تمتلك إيران سلاحاً نووياً بأي شكل أو صورة.

31 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC81 viewsread 1 September 2026

قادمة من سوريا .. قوات الحدود تضبط 15 كغم من الكريستال في سنجار غربي نينوى

31 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC73 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @ShahadyasiriPhoto

يابه #طلع_يدري! https://x.com/shahadyasiri3/status/2094354017707041209?s=46

❤1🤔1

31 Aug 2026, 01:13 UTC70 views2 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @ShahadyasiriPhoto

الدكتور حيدر السويعدي في حسابه على منصة ( x ) : ‏المعاملة بالمثل ......... ‏الاخوة والاحبة المدافعين عن الحاج ( أعزه الله ) والمطالبين بقائه في منصبه ، أو الساكتين عنه على الأقل ‏هل لنا ان نتهمكم بانكم ( مستفادين ) من بقائه بمنصبه بشكل خاص ؟ ‏مثلما تتهموننا باننا نريد ازاحته من أجل الحصول على منصبه ؟ ‏لاننا حقيقة نجهل سبب دفاعكم هذا عنه ( اعزه الله ) ! ‏فلا هو من أصحاب التاريخ الجDAHدي ! ‏ولا هو من البارعين في فنون …

❤2

30 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC56 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @ShahadyasiriPhoto

‏أرادوها حرباً لكسر إيران… فتحولت إلى استنزافٍ للهيبة الأميركية. ‏جاءت واشنطن بأساطيلها وقواعدها وعقوباتها، وراهنت أن الضغط العسكري والاقتصادي سيُجبر طهران على التراجع؛ لكن بعد ستة أشهر ما زالت إيران تفرض نفسها في قلب المعادلة، فيما تحولت الحرب التي قُدّمت أميركياً على أنها سريعة إلى صراع مفتوح ومكلف، تجاوزت كلفته على الولايات المتحدة عشرات المليارات من الدولارات. ‏أميركا التي جاءت لفرض شروطها، وجدت نفسها أمام دولة…

30 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC51 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @ShahadyasiriPhoto

##بالإنفوغرافيك … سؤال الدم لن يسقط بالتقادم، ولن تُغلق ملفاته بخلط الأوراق أو تبديل الروايات .. #الحاج_طالوت_الشروگي يضع فالح الفياض أمام سلسلة من الأسئلة الصريحة والمباشرة بشأن مسؤولية الدماء، وتناقض الروايات، وواجب رئيس هيئة الحشد الشعبي تجاه جميع مقاتليه.

30 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC52 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @ShahadyasiriPhoto

طالوت الشروگي: محاولات خلط الأوراق وتشويه الحقائق هدفها إبقاء شخص واحد في منصبه على حساب مصير الحشد الذي يتوقف عليه أمن العراق وحقوق مقاتليه الذين هم أبناؤه.

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @ShahadPlus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

عالم الافكار 369
@life92 · 163,918
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
عٌمࣩق֯ ؛🖤 🎞
@am_ywrfd · 23,330
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شهد بلس | Shahad Plus” (@ShahadPlus), 10,580 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShahadPlus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.