Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sergey McQueen - Бизнес с Китаем

Channel

Sergey McQueen - Бизнес с Китаем

@SergeyMcqueen

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22,264subscribers

-725 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001263613191
TypeChannel
Username@SergeyMcqueen
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held50
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/SergeyMcqueen

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,26422,98922,626.57 August 2026 — 22,989 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,989 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,978 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,971 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,936 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,885 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,870 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,832 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,833 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,824 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,828 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,820 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,808 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,798 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,791 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,778 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,773 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,775 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,772 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,793 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,801 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,806 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,804 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,797 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,796 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,785 subscribers5 September 2026 — 22,768 subscribers8 September 2026 — 22,762 subscribers11 September 2026 — 22,746 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22,738 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,722 subscribers16 September 2026 — 22,705 subscribers18 September 2026 — 22,645 subscribers25 September 2026 — 22,586 subscribers4 October 2026 — 22,517 subscribers8 October 2026 — 22,442 subscribers12 October 2026 — 22,419 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,389 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,361 subscribers16 October 2026 — 22,362 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,357 subscribers18 October 2026 — 22,351 subscribers19 October 2026 — 22,333 subscribers20 October 2026 — 22,330 subscribers21 October 2026 — 22,319 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,298 subscribers23 October 2026 — 22,290 subscribers24 October 2026 — 22,288 subscribers25 October 2026 — 22,271 subscribers26 October 2026 — 22,264 subscribers7 August 202626 October 2026
50 measurements spanning 80 days, net -725. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,155–23,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 22:3922,264-7
25 Oct 2026, 20:2122,271-17
24 Oct 2026, 18:1622,288-2
23 Oct 2026, 19:4522,290-8
22 Oct 2026, 17:1922,298-21
21 Oct 2026, 11:5722,319-11
20 Oct 2026, 12:4622,330-3
19 Oct 2026, 10:2922,333-18
18 Oct 2026, 09:1822,351-6
17 Oct 2026, 10:1122,357-5
16 Oct 2026, 07:3622,362+1
15 Oct 2026, 10:1622,361-28
14 Oct 2026, 13:0722,389-30
12 Oct 2026, 23:4922,419-23
8 Oct 2026, 16:2122,442-75
4 Oct 2026, 02:3822,517-69
25 Sept 2026, 07:3922,586-59
18 Sept 2026, 21:1722,645-60
16 Sept 2026, 14:5922,705-17
14 Sept 2026, 17:3622,722first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 13 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.46%
avg views ÷ 22,264 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.678%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held23 (13 November 2025 – 6 October 2026)
Views total6,640
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Oct 2026, 13:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 18s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

522 reactions across 23 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤22643.3%
🔥19938.1%
🤩407.66%
🏆214.02%
🤯183.45%
⚡122.30%
🙏30.575%
🌭20.383%
🦄10.192%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 522 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2025 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 23 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SergeyMcqueen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 November 2025 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Oct 2026, 17:25 UTC≈1,320 views13 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥11❤2

6 Oct 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,510 views17 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Пришла большая посылка, вот некоторые вещи от туда) практически все уже уезжает на отправку клиентам

⚡8❤5🏆3🔥1

4 Oct 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,790 views12 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

100 тысяч подписок в инсте на аккаунте BrandSpace Полтора года назад я вам показал этот проект, задумка была сделать не просто небольшой байерский сервис, а магазин с большущей командой и выручкой. Так и получилось, мы росли и растем очень быстро, в нашей нише у нас самые большие аккаунты, (больше 10) недавно один из них перешагнул отметку в 100.000🔥 Я знаю, что меня читает много байеров, поэтому поделюсь ниже инфо…

❤12

2 Oct 2026, 18:53 UTC≈2,020 views3 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Думаете, что блогеры ходят только в оригинальных вещах? Девушка, которая имеет в своих социальных сетях более 1млн подписчиков, регулярно публикует образы с оригинальными вещами Hermes, Celine, Alaïa и активно продвигает собственные коллаборации - носит копии. На одном из ее последних видео, люди в социальных сетях заметили, что сумка от бренда Chanel (которую она обозревала со своим аутфитом) не является оригиналь…

❤3

25 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC≈2,680 views4 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

💼 Ищу сценариста Reels / TikTok в команду! Доброго времени суток! 👋 я занимаюсь выкупом, проверкой и доставкой люкс вещей из Китая. Работаю уже 7 лет, имею 3500+ положительных отзывов и активно развиваю соцсети Сейчас ищу сценариста для коротких вирусных роликов о люксовых брендах, моде, аксессуарах, трендах и lifestyle. Что нужно делать: — писать сценарии до 60 секунд; — придумывать сильные хуки и удержание; — са…

🤩2🔥1🙏1

22 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC≈2,600 views20 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Строю бренд ювелирных украшений В связи с тем, что сейчас явно тренд на лабораторные бриллианты, мы решили построить свой бренд с ювелирными украшениями. Не смотря на то что в моем магазине мы уже продаем украшения, мы решили пойти по другому и сделать для этого отдельный проект. Уже завели аккаунты во всех соц сетях, и за первый месяц в инсте подписалось больше 4 000 человек и мы получили первые заказы с этого акк…

🔥7❤5🏆4🤩4

21 Sept 2026, 18:57 UTC≈2,550 views18 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Природный бриллиант за 150.000$ или лабораторный за 6.000$? Показываю кольцо, которое мы сделали под заказ для клиентки. В центре розовый бриллиант грушевидной огранки на 4 карата, по бокам еще два камня По центру стоит розовый бриллиант грушевидной огранки на 4 карата, по бокам белые бриллианты. В бутике подобное кольцо обойдётся примерно в 150 000$ И вопрос даже не только в цене. Такие украшения не лежат в свобо…

❤10🔥5🤩3

19 Sept 2026, 15:33 UTC≈2,570 views14 reactions1 Starread 13 October 2026
Photo

Быстрый заказ часов для клиента из Китая В августе (17.08) мне написал клиент, что ищет себе часы Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711R и 5712R, две культовые модели из розового золота. Также он рассматривал AP и Rolex Daytona. Но выбор встал на модель 5712R, потому что она выглядит интересней, так часы с четырьмя дополнительными индикаторами. Асимметричное расположение усложнений придает часам сложный и живой вид. Была с…

❤12🌭1🤩1

16 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈2,480 views20 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Где оригинал - итоги На самом деле оригинал здесь это светлые туфли, за которые проголосовало меньшинство😄 92 голоса - копия 36 голосов - оригинал Светлые это туфли моей девушки из оригинального бутика Gucci, они стоят 990€ Темные я купил на фабрике за 800 юаней (102€) Разница в 888€, так еще и копия выглядит лучше оригинала))) И даже не смотря на то что у пар между собой есть отличия, начиная от цвета ткани, фур…

🤯8❤6🤩6

13 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈3,020 views145 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Где оригинал? 🔥темные ❤️светлые

🔥92❤51🙏2

12 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈3,190 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Носишь дорогие часы - ты цель для грабителей Девушку обокрали в одном из лучших отелей Турции - с ее слов из номера пропали часы Audemars Piguet за 100.000 евро. Она приехала с семьёй в пятизвёздочный The Bodrum Edition в Бодруме и сняла номер за €3к в сутки. Часы пропали из комнаты два дня назад — девушка сняла их перед душем. Говорит, камеры зафиксировали, как она заходит в номер с аксессуаром на руке, а выходит …

❤9🔥3🤩3⚡1

10 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC≈3,250 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Проверяем на герметичность Rolex Land Dweller 40мм Моя фабрика может делать часы, которые пригодны к плаванью в них, не смотря на то, что все равно делать этого не рекомендуется, будем проверять😊 Это новая модель 2025 года, сейчас очень желанные часы, в бутике на них большая очередь и получить их можно только у перекупов за 25 000€ Часы из 904L стали, сапфировое стекло, стеклянная задняя крышка, аналог оригинально…

🔥8❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @SergeyMcqueen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sergey McQueen - Бизнес с Китаем” (@SergeyMcqueen), 22,264 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SergeyMcqueen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.