Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
119 average views per post against 204,141 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.059%. Across the 7,079 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,015–316,163 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.88% and 13.4%, with a median of 5.50%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured
339 of 339 published in the window (333 exact, 6 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
40,461
Mature posts only
0.163% over 75 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 38 days, net -2,791. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 203,719–207,377 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 15:18
204,141
-117
15 Sept 2026, 16:59
204,258
-67
14 Sept 2026, 01:00
204,325
-99
12 Sept 2026, 08:21
204,424
-128
10 Sept 2026, 07:19
204,552
-181
6 Sept 2026, 22:16
204,733
-239
4 Sept 2026, 09:56
204,972
-87
2 Sept 2026, 20:16
205,059
-120
1 Sept 2026, 19:45
205,179
-125
31 Aug 2026, 17:36
205,304
-108
30 Aug 2026, 19:15
205,412
-96
29 Aug 2026, 18:27
205,508
-57
28 Aug 2026, 20:39
205,565
-50
28 Aug 2026, 00:04
205,615
+30
26 Aug 2026, 23:19
205,585
-73
25 Aug 2026, 23:37
205,658
-65
24 Aug 2026, 22:14
205,723
-127
23 Aug 2026, 06:14
205,850
+34
21 Aug 2026, 14:58
205,816
-95
20 Aug 2026, 16:22
205,911
first reading
Engagement
609 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.058%
avg views ÷ 204,141 subscribers
Avg views / post
119
339 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.459%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
339
of 609 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 339 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
609 (8 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
40,461
Reactions total
24
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
38
Links
4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
1m 33s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 41 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
31
66.0%
👏
9
19.1%
🔥
4
8.51%
🤔
2
4.26%
🎉
1
2.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 609 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 609 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
कृषि - दलहन
इससे प्रशन बनते हैं इसे एक टेबल में आसान तरीका से प्रस्तुत किया गया है ताकि याद जल्दी हो जाए। कृषि से संबंधित इसके आगे का पार्ट भी उपलब्ध होगा।
इससे पूर्व कृषि के तहत - कृषि का प्रकार ,चावल, गेहूं ,मोटा अनाज दिया गया है।
📚 INFOGRAPHIC: इन्फोग्राफिक के माध्यम से महत्वपूर्ण तथ्यों का जल्दी और प्रभावी रिविजन करें। ⚡
इससे पहले भूगर्भिक सरंचना, खनिज, उर्जा , दिया गया है pinned msg में देखें और भी अन्य विषय आग…
Showing the 12 most recent of 609 posts we hold for @SelectionSeriesYT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 58 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
किस वैश्विक आयोजन ने सर्वप्रथम पर्यावरण संरक्षण और विकास पर समन्वित अंतरराष्ट्रीय कार्रवाई की शुरुआत की थी?
Which global event first initiated coordinated international action on environmental protection and development?
रियो सम्मेलन, 1992/Rio Summit, 199222%
जोहान्सबर्ग शिखर सम्मेलन, 2002/Johannesburg Summit, 200221%
निम्नलिखित में से कौन-सा राज्य, भारत के कुल जूट उत्पादन का लगभग तीन-चौथाई भाग उत्पादित करता है?
Which of the following states produces about three-fourths of India's total jute production?
पश्चिम बंगाल/West Bengal60%
ओडिशा/Odisha17%
बिहार/Bihar6%
असम/Assam17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
निम्नलिखित में से कौन-सा मंदिर, द्रविड़ शैली की मंदिर वास्तुकला का प्रमुख उदाहरण नहीं है?
Which of the following temples is not a prime example of Dravidian style temple architecture?
निम्नलिखित में से कौन-सा एक अनवीकरणीय संसाधन है?
Which one of the following is a non-renewable resource?
सौर ऊर्जा/Solar energy16%
बायोमास/Biomass22%
पवन ऊर्जा/Wind energy19%
पेट्रोलियम/Petroleum43%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 609 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@SelectionSeriesYT named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@biharsi_eduteriya named in 1 post, 31 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
BPSC Teacher Daroga Bihar GK GS ™ @BPSC_Teacher_Daroga_Bihar_GK_GS · 152,104 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
NCERT QUIZ BOT ™ @VikasNCERT · 232,445 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
BIHAR DAROGA SI BSSC BPSC GK GS AEDO @BIHAR_DAROGA_SI_BSSC_GK_GS_AEDO · 177,068 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
Online Gk Current Affairs Quiz™ SSC UPSC BPSC MPSC Banking Exams🎯 @Online_upsc_bpsc_mpsc_gk_quiz · 291,842 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
Strategy Classes - Bank SSC PCS 🏆 @SSC_Quiz_daily · 219,671 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
संविधान Constitution Polity Quiz Notes @Constitution_Polity_Quiz_Notes · 124,411 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
Gk Quiz Area™ { GENERAL KNOWLEDGE GK QUIZ } @Khan_Sir_Gk_Kumar_Gaurav_Sir_Utk · 203,231 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
LUCENT GK QUIZ UPSC BPSC SSC Railway Teaching Exams @UPSC_SSC_Lucent_Static_Gk_Quiz · 218,021 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
🎖️𝐄𝐗𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐓 𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐙 𝐇𝐔𝐁🎖️ @Expert_Quiz · 107,442 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 14 August 2026
Quiz Empire 🚀 @All_sub_quiz_and_poll · 209,268 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
IIT JAM UGC CSIR NET EXAMS @Exams_Point · 186,249 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
UPSC NCERT HISTORY GEOGRAPHY QUIZ @UPSC_History_Geography_Quiz · 221,462 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Railway Science Gk MCQ Quiz ™ RRB Railway NTPC ALP Gs Quiz Hindi @RRB_Railway_NTPC_ALP_Science_Gk · 188,825 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
𝐁𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐒 𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐙 𝐇𝐔𝐁™ @Brics92 · 182,517 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
SSC ENGLISH GRAMMAR CGL CHSL GD MTS @SSC_ENGLISH_GRAMMAR_CGL_GD_MTS · 222,326 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
UPSC EPFO APFC Current Affairs @UPSC_EPFO_APFC_Current_Affairs · 252,170 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
UPSC SSC GD Exam Lucent Static GK @UPSC_SSC_Exam_Lucent_Static_GK · 221,279 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
🎓𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐙 𝐖𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐇 (𝐔𝐏𝐒𝐂 𝐒𝐒𝐂 𝐑𝐀𝐈𝐋𝐖𝐀𝐘 𝐔𝐏 𝐏𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐄 DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS 𝐐𝐔𝐈𝐙) @ALL_15SEC_QUIZ · 220,874 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
RAILWAY NTPC RRB ALP JE RPF POLICE GROUP D @Railway_RRB_ALP_NTPC_RPF_Group_D · 236,490 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UPSC (PRE + Mains) 2026-27 ™” (@SelectionSeriesYT), 204,141 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SelectionSeriesYT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.