目录2.0频道被炸毁 反差目录3.0频道https://t.me/+rUAt7RSBT9NiNGI6 请各位都加一下 防止失联
❤3
Channel
@SLJX01A
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
60,406subscribers
+11,396 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003779727623 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SLJX01A |
| Created | 10 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SLJX01A |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:59 | 60,406 | +508 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:09 | 59,898 | +898 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 59,000 | +1,245 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 57,755 | +355 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 57,400 | +361 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 57,039 | +294 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 56,745 | +346 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 56,399 | +485 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 55,914 | +1,002 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 54,912 | +1,276 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 53,636 | +2,127 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 51,509 | +1,095 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 50,414 | +551 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 49,863 | +417 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 49,446 | +163 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 49,283 | +273 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 49,010 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 49,010 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 44 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (10 May 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 272,580 |
| Reactions total | 235 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
235 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 147 | 62.6% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 13.6% | |
| 🥰 | 28 | 11.9% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 8.51% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 3.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 235reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
目录2.0频道被炸毁 反差目录3.0频道https://t.me/+rUAt7RSBT9NiNGI6 请各位都加一下 防止失联
❤3
目录2.0频道被炸毁 反差目录3.0频道https://t.me/+rUAt7RSBT9NiNGI6 请各位都加一下 防止失联
❤4👍3🥰1
目录2.0频道被炸毁 反差目录3.0频道https://t.me/+rUAt7RSBT9NiNGI6 请各位都加一下 防止失联
👍3❤2🥰1
【现在已开启投稿原视频内容加入会员群😀】 ♻️高价回收原视频资源(看截图报价 好的内容几百到上千不等) 如何加入? @slkf01bot 私信客服 【投稿】 两个字 发送你的内容的全部大范围截图(如图上所示) 客服看到之后如果内容达标 发送你的全部内容 客服会发群邀请链接和赞助进群享受一样的服务 (永久入群资格) 注:不管大家是投稿还是回收资源 如果不想流出 可给客服说不外发 客服会保障大家的安全 绝不外泄
👍6👏6🔥3❤2
目录2.0频道被炸毁 反差目录3.0频道https://t.me/+rUAt7RSBT9NiNGI6 请各位都加一下 防止失联
❤8👏3🥰2
目录2.0频道被炸毁 反差目录3.0频道https://t.me/+rUAt7RSBT9NiNGI6 请各位都加一下 防止失联
👍2
目录2.0频道被炸毁 反差目录3.0频道https://t.me/+rUAt7RSBT9NiNGI6 请各位都加一下 防止失联
❤4🥰3👍2
群主自用推荐(稳定.靠谱.速度快.全局模式更安全) 如果看我们的视频加载慢的 推荐此vpn 点击链接注册,自动赠送福利 https://heysocks.net/share/TLrYEl 手动填写邀请码:TLrYEl獲取一天 輸入折扣碼: TLrYEl 享受95折扣
🔥4👍3❤2🥰2
目录2.0频道被炸毁 反差目录3.0频道https://t.me/+rUAt7RSBT9NiNGI6 请各位都加一下 防止失联
❤2👍2
有兄弟反馈支付问题 如遇支付问题 请重新拉单
👏4❤2🥰2
实录限时活动已开放 限时入群永久资格 活动价8️⃣8️⃣元 限时3天 时间有限 喜欢优质质量无脑入 价格已改 点击进入会员群查看全部内容
❤7🥰1
精选合集跳转 点击即可跳转【100—200】 反差女主101 反差女主102 反差女主104 反差女主105 反差女主106 反差女主107 反差女主110 反差女主112 反差女主113 反差女主119 反差女主121 反差女主122 反差女主123 反差女主124 反差女主125 反差女主126 反差女主128 反差女主129 反差女主134 反差女主138 反差女主145 反差女主146 反差女主148 反差女主149 反差女主151 反差女主157 反差女主169 反差女主170 反差女主171 反差女主172 反差女主174 反差女主176 反差女主181 反差女主183 反差女主184 反差女主189 反差女主191 反差女主197
❤30👍4🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @SLJX01A. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@SLJX01A edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“实录中转防失联” (@SLJX01A), 60,406 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SLJX01A.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.