22 measurements spanning 22 days, net -222. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,089–15,377 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 19:25
15,122
-5
27 Aug 2026, 17:54
15,127
-1
26 Aug 2026, 14:35
15,128
-6
25 Aug 2026, 17:22
15,134
-4
24 Aug 2026, 20:25
15,138
-17
23 Aug 2026, 05:48
15,155
+5
21 Aug 2026, 17:46
15,150
-8
20 Aug 2026, 17:39
15,158
-61
19 Aug 2026, 14:02
15,219
-12
18 Aug 2026, 16:44
15,231
+30
17 Aug 2026, 15:58
15,201
-13
16 Aug 2026, 08:34
15,214
-19
14 Aug 2026, 20:36
15,233
-24
13 Aug 2026, 13:17
15,257
-12
12 Aug 2026, 14:14
15,269
-9
11 Aug 2026, 16:14
15,278
-14
10 Aug 2026, 16:42
15,292
-19
9 Aug 2026, 18:18
15,311
-6
8 Aug 2026, 21:49
15,317
-14
7 Aug 2026, 18:48
15,331
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 15,122 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,150
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.295%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
39 (21 June 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
49,394
Reactions total
140
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
311 reactions across 36 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
199
64.0%
👍
62
19.9%
🔥
13
4.18%
😍
11
3.54%
💯
8
2.57%
💘
6
1.93%
🤝
6
1.93%
🤓
2
0.643%
🤷♀
2
0.643%
😎
1
0.322%
🥰
1
0.322%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Qulog'im og'riyapti" darslik uchun. Shifokorga "og'riyapti" deyishingiz kerak.
Fe'llarni mukammal birlashtirasiz, lekin qo'shningiz sizdan uchinchi marta tuz so'raganda va siz xushmuomalalik bilan eshikni yopmoqchi bo'lganingizda, siz tilsiz qolasiz. Yoki shifokorga o'zingizni qanday his qilayotganingizni tasvirlab berganingizda va ular sizga tushunarsiz qaraganlarida.
Haqiqiy hayotda grammatika sizni qutqarmaydi.…
🇷🇺"Счастливые люди не могут быть злыми.
Обидеть других пытается лишь тот,кто сам несчастен"
🇺🇿«Бахтли одамлар ёвуз бўлолмайдилар.
Бошқаларни ранжитишга фақат ўзи бахтсиз инсон уринaди.»
@Rustiliniosonorgan
🇷🇺 💸💎Оплата
🇺🇿💸💎haq to'lash
📍 Счёт, пожалуйста—iltimos, hisob-kitob qiling
📍Чек, пожалуйста—marhamat, chekni oling
📍Можно попросить счёт?—iltimos, menga hisob-kitobni keltiring.
📍Могу я взять чек?—chekni olsam bo‘ladimi?
📍Я бы хотел рассчитаться сейчас—men hozir hisob-kitob qilmoqchiman
📍Сколько я вам должен?—sizga necha pul berishim kerak?
📍Сколько всего?—hammasi qancha bo‘ladi?
📍Мне кажется,в счёте ошибка—menimcha…
🗣TIL, SUXBAT - ЯЗЫК, РАЗГОВОР.
📌Nima dedingiz? - Что вы сказали?
📌Bu kim? - Кто это?
📌Nima? - Что?
📌Tushundingizmi? - Вы поняли?
📌Tushunarlimi? - Вам понятно?
📌Tushunarli - Мне понятно,
📌Bu yerda kim rus tilini biladi? - Кто здесь знает русский язык?
📌Siz ruscha gaplashasizmi? - Вы говорите по-русски?
📌Siz rus tilini bilasizmi? - Вы знаете русский язык?
📌O‘zbek tilini o‘rganayapman Я изучаю узбекский язык,
📌O‘zbek t…
🗣 Do'kon yoki bozorga safar uchun so'zlar va iboralar
🗣Слова и фразы для похода в турецкий магазин или базар
💲 Цена - Narx
💲 Сколько? (о цене, о весе) - Qancha? (Narxda, og'irlikda)
💲 Очень дорого. - Juda qimmat
💲 Очень дешево. - Juda arzon
💲 Цена подходящая. - Hamyonbop narx
💲 Цена не подходящая. - To'g'ri kelmas narx
👥 Скидка - Chegirma
👥 Скидка есть? - Chegirma bormi?
👥 Да, есть - Ha, bor
👥 Давайте сделаем ски…
🇷🇺Oila haqida qisqacha gaplar!
У меня большая семья - Mening katta oilam bor.
У меня два старших брата и младшая сестра - Mening 2ta katta akalarim va 2ta kichik singillarim bor.
У тебя есть братья или сёстры? - Sening akalaring yoki opalaring bormi?
У вас есть дети? - Sizning farzandlaringiz bormi?
У меня нет детей. - Mening farzandlarim yoʻq.
У меня сын и дочка. - Mening qizim va oʻgʻlim bor.
…
🔅Ждать. Kutmoq
🔅Аптека. Dorixona
🔅Врач. Shifokor
🔅Новый. Yangi
🔅Старый. Eski
🔅Красивый. Chiroyli
🔅Плохой. Yomon
🔅Весёлый. Hushtabiat,shod
🔅Умный. Aqlliy
🔅Грустный. G'amgin, hafa
🔅Глупый. Ahmoq,aqlsiz
🔅Каменщик. G'isht teruvchi
🔅Катастрофа. Fojiya
🔅Кладовая. Ombor
🔅Климат. Iqlim
🔅Кожура. Po'st daraxt
@rustiliniosonorgan
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @Rustiliniosonorgan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Rustiliniosonorgan edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,337,272 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Rus Tilini O'rganamiz!🇷🇺 @rus_tili · 67,734 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 August 2026
Rus tilini O'rganamiz @rustili · 175,627 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
Music 2026 🎶 @QUSHIQLAR_UZBEKCHA_QO_SHIQLAR · 48,514 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рус тилини осон урганиш” (@Rustiliniosonorgan), 15,122 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rustiliniosonorgan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.