Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝖱𝗈𝗌𝖾́ 𔘓.

Channel

𝖱𝗈𝗌𝖾́ 𔘓.

@Rosieland

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,286subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001283649925
TypeChannel
Username@Rosieland
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rosieland

Growth

3,2793,2933,2866 August 2026 — 3,293 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,293 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,289 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,279 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,286 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,277–3,295 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:163,286+7
10 Aug 2026, 14:213,279-10
7 Aug 2026, 14:303,289-4
6 Aug 2026, 23:003,293no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:513,293first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.72%
avg views ÷ 3,286 subscribers
Avg views / post
155
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,552
Reactions total146
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
57s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

146 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5034.2%
❤‍🔥4832.9%
💘4128.1%
🔥53.42%
🍓21.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC95 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

پیام‌ دست نویس منتشر شده از رزی به مناسبت دهمین سالگرد دبیو در ویورس💞 بلینکای ما باورم نمیشه که ما همین الانشم 10 ساله که باهمدیگه‌ایم؟! واقعا باورش سخته. هنوزم اولین دیدارمون به عنوان بلک پینک و بلینک رو یادمه، اون موقع خیلی خجالتی و دستپاچه بودم. وقتی 19 سالم بود دبیو کردم و حالا 29 سالمه، شماها تک تک لحظات رشد کردنمون رو دیدین و با عشق تشویقمون کردین. فکر می‌کنم به لطف شماها بود که تونستم به اینجا برسونم و این روی

❤‍🔥10💘32🔥1

Signed M_K

7 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC106 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

آپدیت اینستاگرام رزی🖤🩷 "💗ده سال با این دخترا 💗 اصلاً نمی‌تونم باور کنم که این 10 سال گذشته چقدر برام ارزشمند بوده. از 19 سالگی تا 29 سالگی، کنار این دخترها خیلی چیزا یاد گرفتم و واقعاً رشد کردم. همه‌ی اینا هم به خاطر عشق و حمایتیه که شما بلینک‌ها همیشه بهمون دادین برای همه‌ی لحظه‌ها و خاطره‌های فوق‌العاده‌ای که با هم ساختیم، تا ابد قدردونم. هیچ کلمه‌ای نمی‌تونه توضیح بده چقدر همتون رو دوست دارم و چقدر خوش‌شانسم که ب

💘6

Signed M_K

7 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC106 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

آپدیت اینستاگرام رزی💕 ─ #Update | #Instagram ─ ˹ @RosieLand ٫ َ🌼 .

7

Signed M_K

7 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC104 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

رزی در فرودگاه به یکی از بلینک‌ها گفته که فردا لایو اینستاگرامی برگزار میکنه💘 🗣️ : رزی! فردا لایو میای؟ 🌟 : تو اینستگرام؟ 🗣️ : آره 🌟 : باشه تلاشمو می‌کنم بیام ─ #Info ─ ˹ @RosieLand ٫ َ🌼 .

❤‍🔥6💘1

Signed M_K

7 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC97 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

رزی به سلامت به کره برگشت✈️ ─ #Info ─ ˹ @RosieLand ٫ َ🌼 .

❤‍🔥6🔥2💘1

Signed M_K

7 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC98 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

کمپانی The Black Label بیانیه ای درمورد موضع رزی برای دهمین سالگرد بلک پینک منتشر کرد🌙 متن بیانیه: "سلام این بلک لیبله. اول و مهم تر از همه مایلیم از همه فن هایی که همچنان عشق و حمایتشون رو به آرتیست ما رزی نشون میدن صمیمانه تشکر کنیم. ما این بیانیه رو در مورد اطلاعات نادرست و گمانه زنی های تایید نشده ای که اخیرا پیرامون شرکت رزی در دهمین سالگرد دبیوش هست منتشر میکنیم. بلک لیبل و رزی از قبل اطمینان حاصل کردن که تمام

6💘1

Signed M_K

6 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC225 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ترک toxic till the end رزی پس از 100 میلیون استریم در کره جنوبی، موفق به دریافت گواهی پلاتینیوم استریمینگ از KMCA شد و به دومین ترک رزی تبدیل شد که به این موفقیت میرسه🎡 ─ #Info | #ToxicTillTheEnd ─ ˹ @RosieLand ٫ َ🌼 .

❤‍🔥24

Signed M_K

6 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC256 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

آپدیت اینستاگرام برند Levis با رزی💘 ─ #Update | #Levis ─ ˹ @RosieLand ٫ َ🌼 .

17💘3❤‍🔥2🍓2

Signed M_K

6 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC244 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

رزی در لس آنجلس دیده شده🌟 ─ #Info ─ ˹ @RosieLand ٫ َ🌼 .

💘202🔥2

Signed M_K

6 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC221 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

آپدیت اینستاگرام رزی🍓 “شوخی ندارم 😗” ─ #Update | #Instagram ─ ˹ @RosieLand ٫ َ🌼 .

16💘6

Signed M_K

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Rosieland. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 873,931 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝖱𝗈𝗌𝖾́ 𔘓.” (@Rosieland), 3,286 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rosieland.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.