Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 深圳出击俱乐部报告

Channel

深圳出击俱乐部报告

@RomanticBabyyou011

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,539subscribers

+1,345 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004340383131
TypeChannel
Username@RomanticBabyyou011
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 30 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RomanticBabyyou011

Growth

2,1943,5392,866.56 August 2026 — 2,194 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,266 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,446 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,613 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,873 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,990 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,068 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,130 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,279 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,423 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,539 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 27 days, net +1,345. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,992–3,741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 00:383,539+116
31 Aug 2026, 05:343,423+144
28 Aug 2026, 07:123,279+149
25 Aug 2026, 15:073,130+62
22 Aug 2026, 23:363,068+78
19 Aug 2026, 20:252,990+117
16 Aug 2026, 18:142,873+260
13 Aug 2026, 13:582,613+167
10 Aug 2026, 14:182,446+180
7 Aug 2026, 17:112,266+72
6 Aug 2026, 22:152,194first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.72%
avg views ÷ 3,539 subscribers
Avg views / post
167
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held25 (30 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,335
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC19 viewsread 7 August 2026

深圳出击俱乐部报告 https://t.me/RomanticBabyyou 学生:Muhammad 出击日期:8月7日 老师:福田 甜宝 老师号:@abbyaimi 地区:#福田 #车公庙 水费:P 人照:人照合一,是本人 身材:皮肤白,b+奶,不饱满 服务:战衣装备齐全,可选服饰。有陪浴,水中萧,可大蟒蛇,蛇到饱 体验:服务型的御姐,中缅混血,虽然上了一点年纪,但身材还是很娇小的。后入很爽。可以无限蛇(但我没蛇) 优点: 服务态度很好,装备齐全,无限蛇 缺点: 确实上了点年纪,让我感觉在操老板娘 评分:68分 纯粹个人出击感受

7 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC18 viewsread 7 August 2026

深圳出击俱乐部报告 https://t.me/RomanticBabyyou 学生:舞王 出击日期:8.7 老师:艾喜悦-琪琪老師 老师号:@siu_i4uBB 地区:#福田上梅林 水费:1399 100分钟 人照:9.0 身材:9.0 服务:8.5 体验:冲着巨乳来的 客服遥控上楼开门第一眼看到已经被琪琪巨乳深深地着迷又是被惊艳的一天 谈好价格后 我的手已经不老实 急不及待玩弄白白大大的巨乳琪琪性格很好 关键身材还特别好 怎么玩也会配合 废话不多说 直接躺在床上让老师开始流程 老师说他们的表都是按摩身体先最后才调情 但我内心已经很焦急了 总是被巨乳吸引 老师让我背面给她 开始推岩盐石哇舒服哦一下热的一下冰的 最记得的是坐着小椅子拿我的小弟弟甩她奶 好玩最后在老师的奶中出了水 但并不甘于此有点不满足 听说还有双飞下次再约 肉体回 家了 灵魂依然在她那裏 优点:没有缺点 缺点: 评分:9/10 分滿分💯

7 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC11 viewsread 7 August 2026

深圳出击俱乐部报告 https://t.me/RomanticBabyyou 学生:Eric San 出击日期:26/08/07 老师:幼幼酱 老师号:@yyyjj1234512 地区:#福田 #上梅林 水费:800p 人照:8(去美颜 去滤镜) 身材:小不点儿 服务:xz,无吹 无kiss 无蛇 体验: 从嫩妹程度来说,好嫩,小不点儿,正常黄皮 从过程来说 自己洗 一起做 嫩妹没服务总所周知,也不给kiss个蛇 也没69 但是穴水多,吊感好,妹子反馈也比较真实,容易出货. 从总体来说,过程挺惊险的,想知道的可以找我了解。 喜欢冲嫩到没发育的可以上。 优点: 嫩 吊感很紧 皮肤光滑 无纹身 缺点: 过于嫩,没服务 评分:8/10 分滿分💯 纯粹个人出击感受

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

深圳出击俱乐部报告 https://t.me/RomanticBabyyou 学生:陈清泉 出击日期:8月6日 老师:叶灵儿 老师号:@yelinger688 地区:#深圳福田 水费:5KPP双飞 人照:真人更漂亮 身材:大长腿,模特身材 服务:双飞,鸳鸯浴,口,69,🐍,胸推 体验: 看到灵儿妹妹开双飞一直心痒难耐,刚好今天有空,预约好时间后出发,第一次尝试双飞,怀着激动的心情出发甚至提早半小时到达了,进门就遇到灵儿妹妹热情地打招呼,然后坐下沙发交上水费开始叫如烟姐姐过来左拥右抱,两个老师的奶子是真的好大啊,又大又软还挺,摸着摸着两姐妹也是很自然地开始掏我大吊,我说两位都是骚姐姐,让灵儿笑了好一会,再你侬我侬一会后就被拉去鸳鸯浴了,灵儿水中萧,如烟在后面用她的大奶子胸推我,帝王般的享受,洗浴结束后回到床上开始服务,可以挑自己喜欢的衣服,让如烟选了秘书包臀装,再搭配个眼镜非常有韵味,灵儿则选了黑色蕾丝调皮可爱,

1

6 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC286 viewsread 7 August 2026

深圳出击俱乐部报告 https://t.me/RomanticBabyyou 学生:亚当 出击日期:8.5 老师:心心 老师号:@xxanmoh 地区:#南山 水费:P 人照:8.5 身材:10 服务:9 体验:感谢台湾哥赞助,在心心休完假回来的第一天终于约上了。课室是留仙洞附近的高端住宅,环境不错,当然租金也挺贵的,妹妹也准备好了一次性浴巾和漱口水以及矿泉水,点个赞。心心是07年的湖南嫩妹,跟频道照片视频大体一致,有些许美颜,身材高挑苗条,颜值耐看不算惊艳,冷白皮,三点粉,奶头不大而且是粉红的,很好吃,体毛不多但下面阴毛还是比较茂密,我舔了一下,干净无味,口活也很舒服,差点交代了,赶紧戴套战斗,水多很润,换几个常用姿势在妹妹的娇喘中舒服发射。冲完凉妹妹会帮忙擦干后背,很是温柔,待客如男友,难怪小钢炮返了好几次。一个字:夯。 优点:冷白皮,身材好,态度好 缺点:抽烟算吗? 评分:9/10 分滿分💯 纯

6 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC103 viewsread 7 August 2026

深圳出击俱乐部报告 https://t.me/RomanticBabyyou 学生:ABC 出击日期:8.6 老师:龙华多多 老师号:@duoduo7659 地区:#龙华 水费:P 人照:9 身材:瘦小C胸 服务:课表的都有 体验: 体验确实很好,老师不会让你冷场,服务都很周到,能跟你有很多前戏,只要你不喊停。进门发现老师颜值其实比照片要高,不会踩雷的。然后也会照顾你的感受,给你洗干净,擦擦背都有。然后还有波推等等课表上的服务。老师里面水很多哦,屌感很不错,属于瘦瘦小小胸c的水平,去了就是赚了,我觉得是性价比很高,这个价位找不到更好的了。然后也会跟你聊很多,属于嫩姐类型,会配合你各种姿势,口技也是很不错的,也会女上,自己状态一般,也有可能是聊太久了hh最后女上出水,累了要休息了,上了一天的班来跟老师聊聊天享受的感觉。 优点: 很会聊天,服务周到 缺点: 个人喜欢胸更小的,其他无缺点 评分:8/10 分

6 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC636 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

深圳出击俱乐部报告 https://t.me/RomanticBabyyou 学生:jackfunny Joy 出击日期:080X 老师:#龙华丰满洋洋 老师号:@yangSZ9890 地区:#龙华红山 水费:700/P工兵 人照:8.5分 身材:8.5 服务:课表,波推夹肠仔有特色,可以沟通拍小视频 体验:二刷洋洋了,这个东北女孩蛮好玩的,波感觉都不止D了,又大又白又弹又滑。性格也蛮可爱,和东北女孩聊天很开心、有情绪价值。另外,看频道就知道了,这个姑娘喜欢自拍,相信不少兄弟乐于客串一把男优。 遥控上门,课室在龙华核心地段住宅区,但不是热门景点比较安全。轻车熟路进了门,妹妹先为上个客人拖延时间致歉半天,然后拿水在沙发上聊了会天。课室不大但是很温馨,尤其是卧室,紫色调配星空灯,小色情哦。 脱衣共浴,站着就行,大D杯蹭来蹭去的感觉就是爽。妹妹好像有点印象,问本狼是不是来过。哈哈,既然想不起来就算了,本狼就揣着明

5 Aug 2026, 22:54 UTC232 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

深圳出击俱乐部报告 https://t.me/RomanticBabyyou 学生:糕水樽 @gaoshuizun 出击日期:8.5 老师:#饭饭 老师号:@fanfan2007 地区:#宝安 水费:P 人照:9.8 身材:9.5 服务:xcz舌吻69 体验: 颜值身材:9.3 人照一致,可爱排骨靓妹。樱桃小嘴,白皮,皮肤状态也不错,感觉身上香香哒😍 小乳晕A熊,虽然不大但胜在够白,背干净光滑,白白嫩嫩!美美滴白虎一线天,哦吼吼🤩 不管是视觉还是味觉都超赞,背面腰臀比很棒 服务-态度:9.4 饭饭很热情,进门闲聊两句,一起去洗白白。在浴室看到白白嫩嫩的饭饭,小糕就已然蓄势待发。还没挤上沐浴露就感觉香香哒,细心帮洗。 来到床上,早就听说饭饭的🐍技很棒,舌头软软的甜甜的,抱着亲亲舌吻,让人爱不释手。口技也不错,在嫩妹里算中上水准。久不舔b的我也忍不住要尝一下饭饭的秘密花园,白虎一线天,无异味,感觉能排进前三😍

5 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC45 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Telegram 中文圈搜索引擎,积木JIMU 帮你查询任何您想要的群组、频道(不论公开与私密) 👉 助力可提升搜索排名与曝光 🚀

5 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC734 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

深圳出击俱乐部报告 https://t.me/RomanticBabyyou 学生:BTC🍕 出击日期:2026.8.5 老师:#冉冉 老师号:@ranran948 地区:深圳南山区南油 水费:P(半价劵) 人照:9 身材:9.5 服务:9 体验:今天临时起意想放松一下,正好看到中奖P半价劵,听说南山冉冉老师口碑不错,就果断约了。公寓位置很好找,隐蔽性和安全性都很高。按照老师的指引顺利上楼,一进门就被冉冉老师的气质吸引到了,真人比照片还要好看、有感觉,身材曲线特别棒,态度也很温柔。 ​简单寒暄交代完后,先去洗了个舒适的热水澡。出来后躺在床上,老师的服务非常贴心到位,前戏温柔又细腻,手法很轻柔,照顾到了全身每一个敏感点,让人瞬间全身放松、沉浸其中。接着戴好雨伞开始主戏,体验感极佳,包覆感和紧实度都非常好。老师全程非常配合,互动感十足,特别是换到女上姿势的时候,摇晃和顶蹭的节奏掌控得刚刚好,既卖力又性感,没一会儿

4 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC80 viewsread 7 August 2026

深圳出击俱乐部报告 https://t.me/RomanticBabyyou 学生:@leeeee399877 出击日期:2026.8.4 老师:南山元宝HR 老师号:@yb168yb168 地区:#南山 南油 水费:P 人照:9 身材:9 服务:8 体验: 夜色渐浓,我怀着猎艳的期待,驱车赴约。元宝的"课室"竟是一处奢华公寓,地下车位宽敞,彰显着不凡品味。踏入房门,我瞬间被眼前的景象震撼——元宝本人比照片惊艳十倍,9.5分的评价简直太过保守! 她颠覆了我对HR的所有认知,这哪里是职场精英,分明是下凡的精灵!160cm的娇小身材包裹在白色吊带抹胸下,勾勒出令人窒息的曲线。C级车灯挺拔诱人,裤裙下的臀部饱满有肉,每寸肌肤都散发着精心管理的魅力。她那迷人笑容足以让任何男人瞬间沦陷,我毫不吝啬地赞美,她脸颊泛起的红晕更添几分娇媚。 "交水费"后,我们步入浴室。狭小空间中,水珠顺着她完美曲线滑落,那线条感简直是为

4 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC59 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

深圳出击俱乐部报告 https://t.me/RomanticBabyyou 学生:ccn 出击日期:2026/08/03 老师:#果果 老师号:@Guosz2008 地区:#龙华 水费:P 人照:9 身材:8 服务:8 体验:中了老师半价,不过老师休了,隔了一段时间才开,不过老师给换,还是不错的,约了时间,老师指引上楼,课室安全,不需要登记;初见老师,是个嫩妹,人照9分,颜值8分,身材也还行;服务是嫩妹三件套,xcz,之后就是提枪开干,老师下面挺湿的,姿势都配合,干了挺久也不催,完事后聊了会;总体来说,嫩妹中等,想吃嫩妹的可以去! 优点: 嫩妹 缺点: 服务少 评分:7.5/10 分 纯粹个人出击感受

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @RomanticBabyyou011. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“深圳出击俱乐部报告” (@RomanticBabyyou011), 3,539 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RomanticBabyyou011.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.