Channel
@RoldonskiGift
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,101subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001388642439 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RoldonskiGift |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RoldonskiGift |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 3,101 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 3,108 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 3,122 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 3,123 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 3,123 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
303 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5823646757665380728 | 163 | 53.8% | |
| custom 5438305259690686373 | 92 | 30.4% | |
| 🤷♂ | 17 | 5.61% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 3.96% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 2.64% | |
| custom 5456517042012183272 | 3 | 0.99% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.66% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.66% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.66% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.33% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.33% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 303reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 4 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RoldonskiGift. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 September 2025 to 4 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ton продолжает пробивать дно 🤦♂️ Он уже ниже 2$ 🤔 Очень грустно наблюдать как сама платформа в целом убивает токен день за днём 📉 Мнение? 👇 🎁 - Ещё отрастёт 🐒 - Мы в дерьме
custom 582364675766538072833custom 54383052596906863738
Тут уже слили улучшения на маску 🎃 Как вам? 🤔 🎁 - Это просто Ах*енно 🐒 - Стоп,мне неприятно Если наберем 100❤️ под этим постом,разыграю вам маску🎃
❤11custom 54383052596906863737custom 58236467576653807283
Высосали маску за 10 минут,взял себе 10 штук,пусть валяются 😂 Сколько успели купить? 🤔
custom 58236467576653807284
Вышел ещё,только с мгновенной покупкой 🤔 Это берём? 🎁 - да 🐒 - нет Купить звезды со скидкой 30% 👉 @roldonski_stars_bot
custom 543830525969068637313custom 58236467576653807283❤1
Вышли новые подарки 🤔 🎃 15000⭐️— 10k штук 🎃 5000⭐️— 40k штук Купить звезды со скидкой 30% 👉 @roldonski_stars_bot Как вам подарки? 🎁 - Топ 🐒 - Шляпа
custom 582364675766538072811custom 54383052596906863731
Там концепты на улучшения везде всплывают,собрал для вас парочку 🤔 Смотрю сейчас система очень сильно поменялась,раньше при покупке подарка,его продавали в минус до улучшений📉 Сейчас же ситуация вообще другая,люди покупают подарки и продают х2-х10 уже спустя неделю,а то и раньше🤯 Но есть вероятность,что как только выйдут улучшения на новые гифты цена может рухнуть и покупка по оверпрайсу может сыграть в злую шутку…
custom 58236467576653807287custom 54383052596906863731
А я говорил) Ну ладно это я взял ещё мягкий сценарий,цифра в 0.5 Тон это прям антирекорд 📉 Ну в целом я думаю откупят до 2шки,а вот дальше скорее всего отрицательный взлёт 🤔 Трамп дал жару конечно рынку🔥 Кто-то успел купить на дне?🫡 🎁 - Да откупил(а) чутка 🐒 - Было страшно,не стал(а)
custom 54383052596906863735custom 58236467576653807283🤣1
Ton 0.8❤️ Как вам? 🎁 - Я в ах*е 🐒 - Я втрих*й
custom 582364675766538072816custom 54383052596906863737👀1
🎁 Доступны новые подарки! 🎁 41 000⭐️ — 4k подарков, только для премиум, максимум 1 на человека 🎁 10 000⭐️ — 10k gifts, только для премиум, максимум 2 на человека 🎁 10 000⭐️ — 10k gifts, только для премиум, максимум 2 на человека Купить звезды со скидкой 30% 👉 @roldonski_stars_bot Кто купил? 🤔 🎁 - Я закупился 🐒 - Дорого
custom 582364675766538072811custom 54383052596906863732
Похоже все таки будут подарки,прикол🤔 Креативный директор дает намеки🦾 Звезды со скидкой 30% 👉 @roldonski_stars_bot Уже закупили звезды?🤷♂️ 🎁 ~ Конечно 🐒 ~ Нет денег
custom 582364675766538072813custom 54383052596906863736
10 октября у Пашки день рождения 🎁 И везде трубят,что сегодня выйдет подарок статуэтка Дурова🤔 Вообще сложно верить такой инфе,так как эту статуэтку пушили уже раз 5 😂 Что думаем народ? Верим? 🎁 - В этот раз выйдет 🐒 - Опять на*балово Успей купить звезды дёшево 👉 @roldonski_stars_bot🧡
custom 582364675766538072820custom 54383052596906863733
Дуров разрулил 😂 Мнение,после разлока куда пойдёт Ton? 🎁 - Только вверх 🐒 - Спускаемся на дно
custom 582364675766538072811🤣2custom 54383052596906863731
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @RoldonskiGift. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,236,344 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Roldonski Gift” (@RoldonskiGift), 3,101 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RoldonskiGift.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.