기사까지 뜨는거 보니까 얼추 7월 변동성의 여러가지 배경중 주요 원인 맞는거 같네요? https://youtu.be/BahKCO4YDsc?si=9aGQvha1s3KYF3or
Signed RichRoad

Channel
@Rich_Guys01
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,244subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001288576564 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rich_Guys01 |
| Created | 19 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rich_Guys01 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 2,244 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 2,246 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 2,244 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 2,251 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 2,255 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 2,256 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 2,257 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:29 | 2,257 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 June 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,538 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
기사까지 뜨는거 보니까 얼추 7월 변동성의 여러가지 배경중 주요 원인 맞는거 같네요? https://youtu.be/BahKCO4YDsc?si=9aGQvha1s3KYF3or
Signed RichRoad
역사적인 날이로군요
Signed RichRoad
2026년 07월 31일 (금) Sk하이닉스 상한가
Signed RichRoad
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed RichRoad
(펌 글) 진짜 존나 개쳐맞고 반창고 1개 던져준건데 헤헤 하고 있는 나 자신... 이래서 나쁜남자가 먹히는 구나
Signed RichRoad
펌) 단일종목 레버리지가 무제한 공매도와 같습니다. 이 상품은 업틱룰도 없고, 제제도 없어요 대차도 필요없고 그냥 외인이 곱버스 매수하면 자동을, 2배수를 하방 포지션을 취함. 아무런 제제도 없습니다. 현재 정부는 본질을 아무도 모름. 지금 현재 2배 상품에서 누가 이 엄청난 돈을 벌었냐를 보면 답이 나옴. 뭔 외국으로 나가는 삼전, 닉스 ETF 자금을 국내로 돌리기 위한 상품이라고 하는지..... 다시한번 말하지만, 하방으로 곱버스 치면, 대차도 필요없고, 공매도 제한도 필요없고, 업틱룰도 필요없이, 2배 수익률 맞추기 위해 LP들은 기계적으로 하방포지션 잡음 주가 급락의 원인이 바로 이 지점입니다. 또한, ETF는 거래세도 내지 않아요 우리야, 증권사에 수수료를 내지만, 외인이 자사 증권창구로, ETF 주문을 넣는다면, 실제로 거래비용…
Signed RichRoad
이번에 얻은 교훈 숫자로 증명하든 증명하지 않든 급등주의 결말은 동일하다
Signed RichRoad
젠슨황 형님이 키미 열풍에 대해 코멘트 남기셨습니다 1. 저렴한 오픈소스AI 확산 -> AI 이용자 증가 -> 칩 & 데이터센터/컴퓨팅 자원 수요 증가 2. 중국AI가 오픈AI와 앤트로픽 등 미국 기업을 시정에서 밀어낼 가능성은 없다 https://naver.me/GSQCSSt1
Signed RichRoad
지옥같은 6~7월 이로군요 -_-
Signed RichRoad
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed RichRoad
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed RichRoad
마지막 문장이 핵심 "컴퓨팅 자원을 과도하게 구축했다고 판단될 경우" = 데이터센터 더 이상 필요 없네? 그럼 비~싼 반도체 더 이상 안 사도 되니까 capex 줄고 수익성 늘어 나겠네? AMZN, MSFT 등 클라우드 서비스 제공하던 빅테크들은 주가 반등
Signed RichRoad
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Rich_Guys01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,603,839 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rich Guys - 투기와 선동의 민족” (@Rich_Guys01), 2,244 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rich_Guys01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.