Bot

Разденька

@Revival18bot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

11,282monthly users

-109 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID	8891690481
Type	Bot
Username	@Revival18bot
First recorded	21 August 2026
Last confirmed live	22 August 2026
Measurements held	12
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/Revival18bot

Growth

12 measurements spanning 16 days, net -109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,234–11,650 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Monthly users	Change
22 Aug 2026, 16:54	11,282	-268
21 Aug 2026, 11:02	11,550	no change
20 Aug 2026, 08:03	11,550	-52
19 Aug 2026, 11:09	11,602	+1
17 Aug 2026, 12:59	11,601	+165
16 Aug 2026, 05:22	11,436	-19
14 Aug 2026, 13:37	11,455	-77
13 Aug 2026, 04:05	11,532	-10
12 Aug 2026, 04:47	11,542	+131
11 Aug 2026, 08:05	11,411	-79
9 Aug 2026, 09:51	11,490	+99
6 Aug 2026, 09:35	11,391	first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Please 🥵 Mommy
@plsmymom · 8,591179 posts Pure Purple
@purepur · 1,95216 posts CZPOT
@czpot · 12,9911 post Мокрая маечка
@maechka21 · 10,8281 post Menu Builder Advert
@MenuBuilderAdvert · 1,5051 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Разденька” (@Revival18bot), 11,282 monthly users as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Revival18bot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.