5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,390–3,416 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 14:48
3,413
+9
9 Aug 2026, 21:21
3,404
+10
6 Aug 2026, 13:22
3,394
+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:46
3,393
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:36
3,393
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.5%
avg views ÷ 3,413 subscribers
Avg views / post
564
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
24 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
13,531
Reactions total
776
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 08s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
568 reactions across 17 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
110
19.4%
🍓
84
14.8%
🤣
67
11.8%
❤
58
10.2%
💋
38
6.69%
🍌
28
4.93%
😍
28
4.93%
💔
26
4.58%
💘
22
3.87%
🔥
20
3.52%
😱
15
2.64%
👍
11
1.94%
🗿
10
1.76%
😭
10
1.76%
🏆
6
1.06%
😐
5
0.88%
😢
5
0.88%
🤝
5
0.88%
🤗
4
0.704%
🌚
3
0.528%
7 further kinds
13
2.29%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 776reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
عاشق این لحظه توی Damnationـم.
لیان اینجا خیلی خشنتر و جدیتر به نظر میاد؛ الان دیگه خیلی باتجربهتر شده،
ولی وقتی یه لحظه کوچیک و بامزه پیش میاد، فوراً باهاش همراه میشه و حتی بعد از اون فیسبامپ یه لبخند هم میزنه.
اون هیچوقت عوض نمیشه و همیشه یه گوشه از اون شخصیتِ بچگانه و شیطونش رو با خودش حفظ میکنه...
#REdamnation #leonskennedy
╭───────────
╰┈─➤ @Residentevil_fanpage
ظاهراً یه عده قبلاً درباره این موضوع حرف زده بودن، ولی من نه.
کنار خرس "باب کندی" میتونید کلید جتاسکیای که آیدا به لیان داده بود رو هم پیدا کنید؛ البته توی وضعیت خراب و شکسته، برعکس خودِ خرس. جزئیات واقعاً جالبیه..
#RE9 #خبر
╭───────────
╰┈─➤ @Residentevil_fanpage
لیان، وقتی بعد از کاور دادنِ گریس و بقیه با تفنگ ساناتوریوم اون لبخند ریز و مهربون رو زد...
رسماً دل آدمو میبره. 😮💨😮💨😮💨
#wallpaper
╭───────────
╰┈─➤ @Residentevil_fanpage
اینکه جیل ولنتاین در Resident Evil Revelations واکسن T-Abyss را دریافت کرد، یکی از بهترین بازنگریهای داستانی (Retcon) در تاریخ مجموعه است.
این تغییر بهخوبی داستان را به هم پیوند میدهد و دلیل منطقیتری برای داشتن آنتیبادیهای بسیار قدرتمند جیل در Resident Evil 5 ارائه میدهد؛ آنتیبادیهایی که ریشه آنها به آلودگی او توسط نمسیس در Resident Evil 3 برمیگردد.
این دقیقاً یعنی احترام گذاشتن به داستان و تداوم روایت (…
آندره پنیا، بازیگر نقش لوئیس سرا، توضیح داد چرا یکی از دیالوگهای Resident Evil 4 Remake برایش معنای بسیار عمیقی دارد.
در یکی از قسمتهای اخیر پادکست Press F to Fear، آندره با صداقت درباره گذشتهاش صحبت کرد. او گفت سالها با اعتیاد به الکل دستوپنجه نرم میکرد، چون هیچوقت نمیتوانست به یک لیوان نوشیدنی اکتفا کند. علاوه بر آن، بیش از ده سال هم سیگار میکشید.
به گفته او، این وضعیت به مرور روی سلامت روان و حتی حافظ…
کپکام اعلام کرد که Resident Evil Requiem باعث افزایش فروش کل مجموعه Resident Evil در سراسر جهان شده است.
در بخش پرسشوپاسخ کنفرانس اعلام نتایج مالی سهماهه اول سال مالی ۲۰۲۷، کپکام اعلام کرد که افزایش استقبال از Resident Evil Requiem تأثیر چشمگیری بر فروش کل مجموعه Resident Evil داشته است.
به گفته این شرکت، بسیاری از بازیکنانی که با Resident Evil Requiem وارد این مجموعه شدهاند، بعد از آن به سراغ خرید نسخههای قدیم…
کپکام اعلام کرد که نزدیک به نیمی از بازیکنان Resident Evil Requiem بین ۲۰ تا ۲۹ سال سن دارند.
در بخش پرسشوپاسخ کنفرانس اعلام نتایج مالی سهماهه اول سال مالی ۲۰۲۷، کپکام فاش کرد که حدود نیمی از مخاطبان Resident Evil Requiem و PRAGMATA را بازیکنان ۲۰ تا ۲۹ ساله تشکیل میدهند.
این شرکت همچنین اعلام کرد که بهطور فعال در تلاش است تا در تمام مجموعههای خود، مخاطبان جوانتر را جذب کند. برای این هدف، کپکام از طراحی بازی …
صبح بخیر عزیزان
صبحتون رو با یه ادیت خوب از لیان و جیل شروع کنید...
سازنده:
@Ar_Phonix
#ارسالی 🌹
#Edit #Jill #Leon
╭───────────
╰┈─➤ @Residentevil_fanpage
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @ResidentEvil_FanPage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 184,241 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Resident Evil | رزیدنت اویل” (@ResidentEvil_FanPage), 3,413 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ResidentEvil_FanPage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.