我们系统维护完成,现在网站和软件都可以打开使用了
❤34👍13

Channel
@Reaeemanvpn01
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,562subscribers
-85 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002224264779 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Reaeemanvpn01 |
| Created | 20 July 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Reaeemanvpn01 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 3,562 | -71 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 3,633 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 3,647 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 3,647 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 20 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
464 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 252 | 54.3% | |
| ❤ | 212 | 45.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 464reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2024 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
我们系统维护完成,现在网站和软件都可以打开使用了
❤34👍13
关于苹果解决TG收不到通知的问题 打开小火箭,点底部中间的“配置”,找到你正在用的配置文件,点右边的“i”进去。点右上角加号加一条规则:类型选 DOMAIN-SUFFIX,策略PROXY,域名输入 push.apple.com ,填完点蓝色勾保存。最后回到首页把全局路由改成“配置”模式,再开关一次飞行模式重连网络就行了。 这样TG推送基本就能正常收到了。
❤39👍31
—— 为什么在某些场景下,延迟真的没那么重要? 很多人一看到测速里的 Ping 很高,就觉得这个节点“不行”。但其实,网络体验不能只看延迟,更重要的是——你在用它做什么。 如果你是拿来刷 YouTube、Netflix、TikTok,或者下载游戏、系统更新这类“大流量任务”,真正决定体验的往往是带宽,而不是延迟。 因为视频平台都会提前缓存内容。你在看当前画面的时候,后台其实已经悄悄下载了后面几十秒的数据。所以哪怕节点有 150ms、300ms 甚至更高延迟,只要带宽够大,视频一样能稳定跑 4K、8K,不会卡顿。 下载也是同样的道理。下载速度更依赖“水管有多粗”,而不是数据第一下到达时慢了几十毫秒。很多高带宽的美国或欧洲节点,虽然延迟比日韩节点高,但实际下载速度和稳定性反而更强。 至于 Telegram、WhatsApp 这种文字聊天,其实更不用担心。人打字、阅读、思考回复,本来就是按“秒”计算的。100~300ms 的网…
❤37👍13
🔒 你的真实 IP 为何会“裸奔”? 💡 核心知识点:WebRTC 泄漏是什么? 很多用户发现,即便开启了 VPN,在访问某些网站时,自己的真实 IP 地址依然会被对方获取。这通常不是因为 VPN 失效了,而是浏览器里的 WebRTC 功能在作祟。 WebRTC (Web Real-Time Communication) 是一项允许浏览器进行实时语音或视频聊天的技术。为了提高连接速度,它有时会绕过 VPN 的加密隧道,直接通过你的本地网络接口查询 IP。 🚀 如何应对?三步保卫隐私 1. 进行“压力测试” 不要只看 VPN 连没连上,访问 browserleaks.com/webrtc 如果 Public IP Address 显示的是你的 VPN 地址,说明安全。 如果显示了你的真实宽带 IP,那么你的隐私正在裸奔! 2. 针对性防御 Chrome 用户: Chrome 默认不提供彻底关闭 WebRTC 的开关。建议…
❤60👍27
使用 VPN(虚拟专用网络)不仅是为了访问特定的网站,它在现代互联网使用中扮演着多重角色。从数据安全到提升在线体验,以下是使用 VPN 的核心好处: 1. 核心安全保障:加密通信 当你连接到 VPN 时,它会建立一条加密的“隧道”。这意味着即使你在使用不安全的公共 Wi-Fi(如咖啡厅、机场),黑客或不怀好意的人也无法窃取你的登录凭据、银行卡信息或私人通信。 2. 隐藏真实身份:IP 匿名化 你的 IP 地址就像你的互联网“家庭住址”,能暴露你的地理位置和互联网服务提供商(ISP)。 隐私保护: VPN 会用服务器的 IP 掩盖你的真实 IP,防止网站、营销公司或追踪器根据你的物理位置建立画像。 防止追踪: 减少广告商对你跨站点的行为轨迹追踪。 点击下方链接,开启你的全速自由网络之旅! 📡官方网站:https://reaeeman.com 谷歌应用商店下载: https://play.google.com/store…
👍60❤20
⚠️ 紧急提醒|近期大量Telegram账号被盗! 近期有用户集中反馈:Telegram账号异常掉线 + 无法稳定登录 已确认:PC端病毒攻击正在扩散!务必重视! 🚨 常见异常表现 出现以下情况,请立刻警惕: ❌ 正常账号突然全部设备下线 ❌ 收到验证码,但瞬间失效 ❌ 登录成功后,几分钟内再次被踢 🧠 攻击原理(简化版) 该病毒专门针对 Telegram Desktop(电脑端): 📥 诱导下载恶意程序 🔍 获取本地 tdata 数据 🔪 强制关闭Telegram 🧩 直接登录你的账号 🚫 踢掉所有设备,占号 📩 监听 777000 验证码 🔄 有新设备登录 → 立刻踢出 👉 本质:本地数据被盗 + 会话劫持 ❗️ 为什么验证码没用? 因为病毒会: 抢先读取验证码 或直接让验证码失效 👉 你永远慢一步 🔐 立刻执行的防护措施(重点) ✅ 设置本地锁定密码(最关键) 路径: 设置 → 隐私 → 本地密…
👍65❤18
Reaeeman VPN: Your Ultimate Network Speed Booster! 🚀 Say goodbye to lag! We provide 🚀 ultra-fast and stable connections with 💧 crystal-clear IPs and 🛡 military-grade privacy protection, ensuring your peace of mind online! Whether you are using a 💻 PC, 📱 smartphone, or tablet, we offer full platform support with unlimited data for you to enjoy! It’s as simple as it gets—just one click to connect and instantly access …
👍27❤1
reaeeman VPN: 你的网络加速小能手! 告别卡顿!我们为你提供 🚀 极速稳定 的连接,并确保 IP纯净如初 💧,更有 🛡 军工级隐私保护,让你上网安心无忧! 无论你使用的是 💻 电脑还是 📱 手机、平板,我们都全平台支持,提供无限流量 随心畅享!操作就是这么简单,只需一键连接,即刻拥有安全、快速的全球网络!🐝 快来体验! 🔗 官网地址: https://reaeeman.com 🎉 reaeeman VPN · 免费试用 · 持续更新 · 稳定可靠 真正能长期使用的高速 VPN,强烈推荐你收藏!
👍16❤3
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Reaeemanvpn01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 220,954 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reaeeman VPN/加速器/高速节点/代理” (@Reaeemanvpn01), 3,562 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Reaeemanvpn01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.