31 Oct 2024, 11:04 UTC9 viewsread 19 August 2026
✅ Активирован новый чек! Бот: @send Всего чеков после запуска активировано: 153 Ссылка на чек: https://t.me/send?start=CQFEG9qTKedl
Channel
Забранные чеки от меня
@Razzzdachi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002469594357 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Razzzdachi |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Razzzdachi |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 230
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
31 Oct 2024, 11:04 UTC9 viewsread 19 August 2026
✅ Активирован новый чек! Бот: @CryptoBot Всего чеков после запуска активировано: 152 Ссылка на чек: https://t.me/CryptoBot?start=CQb5wXWa8wyT
31 Oct 2024, 11:03 UTC8 viewsread 19 August 2026
✅ Активирован новый чек! Бот: @send Всего чеков после запуска активировано: 151 Ссылка на чек: https://t.me/send?start=CQ9qtgHL5z8Q
31 Oct 2024, 11:03 UTC7 viewsread 19 August 2026
✅ Активирован новый чек! Бот: @CryptoBot Всего чеков после запуска активировано: 150 Ссылка на чек: https://t.me/CryptoBot?start=CQiw7Elff5Ct
31 Oct 2024, 11:02 UTC5 viewsread 19 August 2026
✅ Активирован новый чек! Бот: @send Всего чеков после запуска активировано: 9 Ссылка на чек: https://t.me/send?start=CQ1OvMBZNIXR
31 Oct 2024, 11:02 UTC4 viewsread 19 August 2026
✅ Активирован новый чек! Бот: @send Всего чеков после запуска активировано: 9 Ссылка на чек: https://t.me/send?start=CQ1OvMBZNIXR
31 Oct 2024, 11:01 UTC4 viewsread 19 August 2026
✅ Активирован новый чек! Бот: @CryptoBot Всего чеков после запуска активировано: 149 Ссылка на чек: https://t.me/CryptoBot?start=CQcqErzwrYVw
31 Oct 2024, 10:59 UTC4 viewsread 19 August 2026
✅ Активирован новый чек! Бот: @CryptoBot Всего чеков после запуска активировано: 148 Ссылка на чек: https://t.me/CryptoBot?start=CQfcOQZ1GRBN
31 Oct 2024, 10:58 UTC4 viewsread 19 August 2026
✅ Активирован новый чек! Бот: @send Всего чеков после запуска активировано: 147 Ссылка на чек: https://t.me/send?start=CQ5q7s4YWmqy
31 Oct 2024, 10:57 UTC4 viewsread 19 August 2026
✅ Активирован новый чек! Бот: @send Всего чеков после запуска активировано: 146 Ссылка на чек: https://t.me/send?start=CQwUTnP4RYCD
31 Oct 2024, 10:57 UTC4 viewsread 19 August 2026
✅ Активирован новый чек! Бот: @send Всего чеков после запуска активировано: 145 Ссылка на чек: https://t.me/send?start=CQXao68KvU5x
31 Oct 2024, 10:56 UTC4 viewsread 19 August 2026
✅ Активирован новый чек! Бот: @CryptoBot Всего чеков после запуска активировано: 144 Ссылка на чек: https://t.me/CryptoBot?start=CQWTF5tGYbXH
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Razzzdachi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,200,301 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“Забранные чеки от меня” (@Razzzdachi). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Razzzdachi.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.