Rewards increased to 4.20%, starting next period

Channel
RAILGUN - Privacy on Ethereum & EVMs
@Railgunproject
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,126subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001319799745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Railgunproject |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Railgunproject |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 2,126 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 2,136 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 2,137 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 2,148 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 2,150 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 2,152 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 2,152 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
There was a protocol security request (upgrade vote) on chain that just passed majority vote and quorum. It changed the payout system for active staker rewards. Previously 2% of the treasury address DAI, WETH & RAIL, per 2-weeks, it stated to upgrade it to 4.2% of the treasury address every two weeks, and added some gas & efficiency code. It also released 2.5 million unminted rail directly to the staker treasury add…
Whenever there is an update, check the signing key to make sure it's safe. This is a popular method for ensuring good downloads. railway.xyz FAQ shows you how.
https://docs.railgun.org/wiki/learn/helpful-links
How to report victim or bad actor for PPOI and others. If you think you or another address is the victim/perpetrator of bad actions such as alleged theft or phishing, immediately report it here: - AMLBot: https://amlbot.com/report-address - SlowMist: https://aml.slowmist.com/recovery-funds.html - TRM Labs: https://chainabuse.com/report Also, DM @seal_911_bot as early as you can if you are affected. Stay safe out…
https://x.com/RailgunIntern/status/2057709737253155300
https://x.com/RAILGUN_Project/status/2057094129700556872
https://x.com/RAILGUN_Project/status/2051639645545664538
Built a Railgun tool: Instantly see which amounts have the most unshielded balance Withdraw the exact same amount to blend in and stay hidden Try it at http://withdraws.wtf
https://x.com/i/status/2048197570879504480
https://x.com/RAILGUN_Project/status/2046967959017672764
https://x.com/RAILGUN_Project/status/2046591692581781931
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Railgunproject. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 332,673 of 1,603,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lumia_news · 109,002
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RAILGUN - Privacy on Ethereum & EVMs” (@Railgunproject), 2,126 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Railgunproject.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.