Channel
@QuartetfriendReview
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,689subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003156412620 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QuartetfriendReview |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QuartetfriendReview |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 1,689 | +14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 1,675 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 1,675 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,043 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
四方茶话会报告：https://t.me/Quartetchat 【妹子花名】：#糖宝 【联系方式】：@tangbaoguaiguai 【正文】： #硬件分析 五官气质：自然杏眼，妆容跟视频里的一致，唇形饱满，鹅蛋脸，挺像初中同学。 皮肤妆感：正常肤色，绸缎手感，尽显温柔。 整体比例：腰腹（腰腹平坦，线条流畅，紧致程度ok）胸部C.臀腿（自然弧度屁屁，脚小小的，缠绵时会把腿锁腰上，双手搂住脖子，也会拖着自己的大腿任君冲刺，抽完烟会用漱口水清理再舌吻） 风格定位：声音甜美的小夹子，解放性压抑的探索大师 #流程黄文 看到妹子的照片和视频确实很养眼，进门看到妹子清纯犹如大学刚毕业出来 喜欢颜值身材可以无脑冲不踩雷 我躺在床上妹子一边帮我吹气球我一边抚摸着她的🐻妹子很白身材也好简单服务后就步入正题 艹起来是真的舒服水也多很润先前面攻击再后入真的舒服 妹子的娇喘一阵一阵 雷霆风雨冲刺完美降落整 体验下来很不错 颜值身材…
❤1
四方茶话会报告：https://t.me/Quartetchat 【妹子花名】：#米雪 【联系方式】：@mixue89 【正文】： #硬件分析 胸蛮大的，皮肤光滑 ，值得称赞。 #流程黄文 依旧美式打法 ，先脱衣，妹纸夸我真白 做的时候看妹纸出水了，我还在怀疑，卧槽 我真有这么牛么，太久没cj了生疏的一批 ，而且身体素质也不如以前了，这可能就是上了年纪的悲痛， 最后 妹子的态度真的很好有耐心。 #课后感 神清气爽 回去休息 下次cj杰斯 #综合评价 好评（超级好评/好评/中评/差评）
【妹子花名】：#虞姬 【联系方式】：@shiw116 【正文】： #硬件分析 nice #流程黄文 抽中虞姬老师优惠劵，变马不停蹄的和老师联系时间，公寓，遥控进入，引入眼帘是那高挑的身材和微微带点肉感的 美貌，净身高170+，教室里没开灯，昏昏暗暗灯光不影响老师水嫩，交完课费，开始陪浴，老师两个硕大的D罩乳房，挺拔让人垂垂欲滴，洗完澡躺在柔软的床上，开始授课了，老师一边舔着胸一边揉搓的几把，酥麻中立马一柱擎天，随后开始口交，老师口活很给力，包裹感强且没有齿感，学生受不了了，立马让老师转过身子，你上我下互舔起来，下面粉嫩而无异味，随后乘热打铁，戴上套套冲击，女上，男上，后入，在老师阵阵呻吟声中交出了我宝贵的精华… #课后感 老师东北人，高挑微微BBW，D罩杯车灯引人入胜，本人喜欢的类型，有时间再度续缘！ #综合评价 好评
❤1
四方茶话会报告：https://t.me/Quartetchat 【妹子花名】：#媛媛 【联系方式】：@yuan0922y 【正文】： #硬件分析 颜值：10 服务：10 身材：10 #流程黄文 在几个群里久闻媛媛老师大名，这次好不容易约到了一课，果断约好时间准时赴约。课室环境不错，安全系数蛮高，老师指引后顺利抵达。进屋交了水费，老师老师的ab面服务，老师的服务，无微不至，面面俱到，专业至极，课表上该有的全部都有。正西的过程，实话实说，写不太出来，主要是整个过程的气氛感和媛媛的投入感夯爆了。导致我很难用语言描述出来其中滋味，只能说就做爱投入和反馈，是在南京遇到的顶级。结束之后回味无穷，期待下次能再有机会去体验。 #课后感 推荐ly们出击，服务是真的好 #综合评价（超级好评/好评/中评/差评）超级好评
四方茶话会报告：https://t.me/Quartetchat 【妹子花名】：#紧妈 【联系方式】：@yongbuniaoxue 【正文】：周五进了紧妈的频道，一下子就被吸引了，当时问了，临时没有空了，遂作罢，但是还是忍不住，对着频道里紧妈的视频撸了2发，感觉还是不过瘾，今天刚好有人鸽了我补位，终于体会到什么叫做爱了。一进门，直接就是拥吻，紧妈的大蟒蛇一下子吻上来了，吻了好久，转战到沙发，褪去衣服，妈妈从耳朵开始一路吮吸到乳头，当然中间也少不了大蟒蛇的深情拥吻，妈妈的前戏真的非常的长，吻到动情处，妈妈把屁股坐在我脸上，一边吃着妈妈的鲍鱼一边揉搓着胸，有个小插曲，女朋友突然来电话了，回复消息的时候妈妈一边帮我舔一边回复，妈妈说这样才刺激，实在是太爽了。舔完妈妈后妈妈开始帮我吮吸肉棒，肉棒在这之前被挑逗的快涨炸了，妈妈的嘴一包裹住，直接就受不了了，口了非常久。对了，中间还有足交和手撸挑逗环节，真的非常爽。挑逗完妈妈带着我去洗澡，帮…
四方茶话会报告：https://t.me/Quartetchat 【妹子花名】：#媛媛 【联系方式】：@yuan0922y 【正文】： 服务很专业，身材一级棒，曲线完美，触感细腻，技术到位又不生硬。倒立口活是绝技，全程情绪价值给得很足，温柔体贴，聊天舒服，完全没有压力感。体验自然流畅，结束后还细心照顾，整体感觉特别好。真心推荐，下次还会再约。 #综合评价 超级好评
四方茶话会报告：https://t.me/Quartetchat 【妹子花名】：#瑶瑶吃不饱 【联系方式】：@yaoyaobb07 【正文】： #硬件分析 人照和最有一个黑衣服的视频9成像，标准颜值系嫩妹，少量文身，胸b左右，黄皮，身材匀称，硬件条件不错。 #流程黄文 进门热情问要不要喝水，随后洗澡有陪浴，上床之后开始嫩妹三件套，先舔胸再口，口无齿感，高于嫩妹平均水平，会主动找你蛇，中途还会偷偷睁眼睛看着你，口了一会儿开始69，户型类似一线天，很好舔。硬了之后戴套开干，传教边做边蛇，5分钟左右出货。 #课后感 颜值不错的嫩妹，身材好，态度好，日感也不错，很紧。作为嫩妹来说值得推荐。 #综合评价 好评
四方茶话会报告：https://t.me/Quartetchat 【妹子花名】：#糖宝 【联系方式】： 【正文】：各方面都无敌，五星好评 #综合评价（） 写完请投递给 @CHHBGHJ_bot
四方茶话会报告：https://t.me/Quartetchat 【妹子花名】：#小熊 【联系方式】：@xiaoxiongnewpyq 【正文】： #硬件分析 身材匀称，肤白貌美，三点粉嫩 #流程黄文 6月初就关注小熊老师了，但迟迟没开课，等了2个月，刚得知小熊回归，果断提前了两天就预订好了包时。 从江宁出发1个多小时达到战场，初见小熊时，那股御姐的气质让人欲罢不能。进房间后小熊先一步脱光光，老狼的目光再也移不开，那奈子简直了，特别挺，乳尖很粉。赶紧拉着小熊一起进浴室，牛牛这就不争气的硬了起来。随即指挥上床，小熊来了段艳舞，眼神勾人魂魄，直接a面开始，从胸一路舔到二弟。一点齿感没有，还会深喉，能感觉到负压，被吸得差点忍不住。小熊提出69，直接坐到我脸上了，直接狂炫小熊的小妹妹，但这个姿势有点影响我的发挥，提出让小熊躺在床边，直接把脸埋在ls小妹妹里面，舔的小熊骚话连篇。提枪开干，一进入就感觉里面好烫，干到起劲时小熊还会吸老狼…
四方茶话会报告：https://t.me/Quartetchat 【妹子花名】：#媛媛 【联系方式】：@yuan0922y 【正文】： #硬件分析 #流程黄文 在四方里观察了一会儿，小黄文看激动了立马就约出击，课室环境非常不错，一开门高挑美女，就知道捡到宝了。服务也是没话说的，口活真的是在南京没遇到比这更好的了，服务非常专业，值得二刷 #课后感 最后软着腿出来的🥹🥹 #综合评价（超级好评/好评/中评/差评） 服务绝对超级好评
四方茶话会报告：https://t.me/Quartetchat 【妹子花名】：#瑶瑶吃不饱 【联系方式】：@yaoyaobb07 【正文】： #硬件分析 去掉美颜，基本差不多，身高165，身材匀称,颜值像可爱的邻家小妹妹，服务态度也很好，化妆也化的浓眉大眼，中短发，身体有小纹身，笑起来有点甜 #流程黄文 跟妹子约好，到地方，没门禁，大门虚掩，进来之后妹子迎接，问要不要喝水，随后一起洗浴，嫩妹胸duangduang的，有点子Q弹，葡萄做饭的时候会突起，🐻也很柔软，传教士时候羞涩哼哼唧唧，下面也很紧，后续一个边🐍边吃奶出货，随便聊了两句开溜 #课后感 该有的都有，态度也挺好的，一次还不错的出击 #综合评价（超级好评/好评/中评/差评） 好评
❤1
四方茶话会报告：https://t.me/Quartetchat 【妹子花名】：#米雪 【联系方式】：@mixue89 【正文】：临时约的，刚好妹妹有时间，按时到地点，遥控上楼 妹妹很腼腆，年纪很小 过程不表，整体感受不错 #硬件分析 身体小小的，身材不错，凶器B+-C，不丰满 #流程黄文 🐍感很好，各种要求都满足，有陪浴，课表内容都有，69了一下感觉还行，无异味，反馈很真实 #课后感 pp被榨干，贤者时间，坐着抱着妹妹顺手写个评 #综合评价（超级好评/好评/中评/差评）中评，进步空间很大
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @QuartetfriendReview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 217,328 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“茶话会报告集” (@QuartetfriendReview), 1,689 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QuartetfriendReview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.