Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DO'STAR

Supergroup

DO'STAR

@Qazaq_Jastarrr

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

1,384members

-23 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

23 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001328292346
TypeSupergroup
Username@Qazaq_Jastarrr
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 September 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Qazaq_Jastarrr

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3781,4111,394.514 August 2026 — 1,407 members14 August 2026 — 1,404 members17 August 2026 — 1,406 members20 August 2026 — 1,393 members24 August 2026 — 1,385 members27 August 2026 — 1,382 members30 August 2026 — 1,386 members2 September 2026 — 1,378 members7 September 2026 — 1,401 members11 September 2026 — 1,396 members15 September 2026 — 1,409 members25 September 2026 — 1,411 members29 September 2026 — 1,411 members4 October 2026 — 1,401 members10 October 2026 — 1,384 members1,38414 August 202610 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 58 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,373–1,416 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
10 Oct 2026, 15:411,384-17
4 Oct 2026, 20:201,401-10
29 Sept 2026, 23:351,411no change
25 Sept 2026, 16:591,411+2
15 Sept 2026, 00:211,409+13
11 Sept 2026, 16:401,396-5
7 Sept 2026, 09:591,401+23
2 Sept 2026, 08:331,378-8
30 Aug 2026, 12:571,386+4
27 Aug 2026, 04:161,382-3
24 Aug 2026, 01:541,385-8
20 Aug 2026, 20:231,393-13
17 Aug 2026, 18:351,406+2
14 Aug 2026, 19:451,404-3
14 Aug 2026, 02:011,407first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DO'STAR” (@Qazaq_Jastarrr), 1,384 members as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Qazaq_Jastarrr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.