Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ميمز قشطه

Channel

ميمز قشطه

@Q_w126

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,887subscribers

-168 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001951626366
TypeChannel
Username@Q_w126
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Q_w126

Growth

11,88712,05511,97117 August 2026 — 12,055 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,049 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,050 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,037 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,024 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,013 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,001 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,990 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,978 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,972 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,962 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,953 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,948 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,944 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,937 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,928 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,913 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,906 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,887 subscribers17 August 20267 September 2026
19 measurements spanning 21 days, net -168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,862–12,080 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 22:2011,887-19
5 Sept 2026, 00:0011,906-7
3 Sept 2026, 09:3811,913-15
2 Sept 2026, 02:1211,928-9
1 Sept 2026, 02:3811,937-7
31 Aug 2026, 04:5311,944-4
30 Aug 2026, 07:4511,948-5
29 Aug 2026, 08:2411,953-9
28 Aug 2026, 09:5711,962-10
27 Aug 2026, 06:4811,972-6
26 Aug 2026, 05:3311,978-12
25 Aug 2026, 03:1511,990-11
23 Aug 2026, 21:5612,001-12
22 Aug 2026, 09:1612,013-11
20 Aug 2026, 22:2612,024-13
20 Aug 2026, 01:2712,037-13
19 Aug 2026, 01:0612,050+1
18 Aug 2026, 02:3212,049-6
17 Aug 2026, 11:3012,055first reading

Engagement

317 posts held, back to 16 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.48%
avg views ÷ 11,887 subscribers
Avg views / post
294
317 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
317
of 317 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 316 of 317 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held317 (16 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total93,346
Reactions total4,263
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 43s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,263 reactions across 316 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3,33678.3%
43310.2%
🤣2696.31%
🥰841.97%
😭521.22%
💔491.15%
😢270.633%
😍80.188%
❤‍🔥50.117%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 316 of the 317 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,263 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 317 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 22:38 UTC54 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

انا كنت فاكرها هتصفر

😭3😁1

Signed َِ𝗔َِ𝗛َِ𝗠َِ𝗘َِ𝗗 َِ𝗛َِ𝗨َِ𝗦َِ𝗦َِ𝗜َِ𝗘َِ𝗡

2 Sept 2026, 19:44 UTC148 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁8

Signed Karim

2 Sept 2026, 19:19 UTC164 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

ام العريس اللي كان متقدملي من كام يوم بترن علي امي تقولها خليها تفكر تاني واحنا مش هنخليها تنزل الغيط معانا

😁12😭1

Signed 𝑺𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒉 l سَارَة 🦌

2 Sept 2026, 16:21 UTC210 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

يعني انتي نزلتي تدريب في بنك وانتي مع محامي وانتي اتخطبتي وانتي ارتبطي اومال انا كنت بعمل ايه في الاجازه محدش خدني معاه ليه

😁7

Signed 𝑴𝒆𝒏𝒏𝒂

2 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC209 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Rasef_N_5amsaPhoto

يمكن و إنتي قاعدة زهقانة في شب قاعد بيقنع أمه يتجوزك. =مثلاً

😁19

Signed 𝑺𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒉 l سَارَة 🦌

2 Sept 2026, 14:16 UTC248 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

ازاي محدش ركز في الموضوع دا قبل كدا

😁9

Signed 𝙰𝙷𝙼𝙴𝙳¹⁰

2 Sept 2026, 13:08 UTC243 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026

ست قواعد للراحه : انت صح ، انتوا صح ، هما صح ، الكلام ده صح ، صح الصح

😁9

Signed Karim

2 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC291 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026

عندي كمية بؤس افتح بيه محل بؤسومات

😁211

Signed Ashraf

2 Sept 2026, 02:01 UTC312 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

هنِيئًا لِمن صَلِّي الْفَجر فَهُوَ فِي ذِمَّة اللَّه 💜

13

Signed َِ𝗔َِ𝗛َِ𝗠َِ𝗘َِ𝗗 َِ𝗛َِ𝗨َِ𝗦َِ𝗦َِ𝗜َِ𝗘َِ𝗡

2 Sept 2026, 01:02 UTC315 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026

نفسي نرجع لبعض (النوم المنتظم)

😁13💔31

Signed ᴊ𝒆𝒉𝒂𝒅

1 Sept 2026, 22:38 UTC371 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026

نمتواا مره كوباية عصير جوزها ما'ت قالت اااااه يا juiceee.

😁11🤣7😭3

Signed 𝑺𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒉 l سَارَة 🦌

1 Sept 2026, 21:16 UTC354 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026

ابويا كل شهر يقول مش دافع النت وهو اكتر واحد بيستخدمه لو فصلته عنه يبقي عقوق ولا اي

😁21

Signed Ashraf

Showing the 12 most recent of 317 posts we hold for @Q_w126. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Q_w126 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The sun will rise and we will try again
@simple_details · 91,055
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ميمز قشطه” (@Q_w126), 11,887 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Q_w126.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.