Channel
@ProofKimWinier
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
| Telegram ID | -1001757657166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ProofKimWinier |
| Description | cp @yunaszhin. |
| Created | 25 June 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ProofKimWinier |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
10 posts held, back to 25 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2022 to 25 June 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
YANG LIAT INI BOLEH MINTA TOLONG FORWARD KE CHANNEL KALIAN?? mau mintaa tolong bantu subs @YexrimKim @KimWinier dong? sekalian pake dn "return @Yexrimkim @Kimwinier to @Yunaszhin" jugaa. ituu usn aku (@yunaszhin) yang akunnya kelogout :( sengaja nunggu 6 bulan an sampe usn nya deak, ehh malah di keep orang.. tolong bantu subs yaa, siapa tau orangnya berbesar hati mau ngembalikan. THANKSS BEFOREEE ALL 😀😔
semoga kamu liat ini berbesar hati mau ngembalikan yaa hehehehe. @yunaszhin
it's not your right please :b
❤2
I hope you want to return it..
kalo kamu (own yang ngekeep) ngiranya ini fakechat, editan, atau apapun aku bisa kokk record chat-an nya.
Photo, posted without a caption
cape banget ini nge scrool nya sampai bawah banget wkwk
aku lupa, ternyata aku beli @KimWinier nya di wa karena waktu itu teleku pending. JADII UNTUNG MASIH ADA BEKAS CHAT AN NYAAA
haloo
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @ProofKimWinier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“return @KimWinier please :(” (@ProofKimWinier). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProofKimWinier.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.