4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,590–4,704 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 20:25
4,603
-12
11 Aug 2026, 08:33
4,615
-50
7 Aug 2026, 22:52
4,665
-26
7 Aug 2026, 05:47
4,691
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
75.9%
avg views ÷ 4,603 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,500
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
32 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
108,368
Reactions total
2,844
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,844 reactions across 31 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,395
49.1%
❤
834
29.3%
🔥
183
6.43%
🙏
136
4.78%
💯
74
2.60%
👏
66
2.32%
🤔
60
2.11%
🤬
50
1.76%
🤯
14
0.492%
👌
8
0.281%
🤣
8
0.281%
🥰
8
0.281%
🎉
3
0.105%
❤🔥
2
0.07%
🤩
2
0.07%
👀
1
0.035%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,844reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 31 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Prolotario1_Channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The Jig(ga) Is Really Up Hov-:
Jay-Z overstayed his welcome. He was never supposed to be in this predicament where he is struggling to release an album (that is finished) but refuses because he is looking for corporate partners to help boost initial sales like his old Sprint deal that allowed him to go platinum on the 1st day with the release of 4:44. His boat was supposed to sink years ago.
In June 2017, Sprint (u…
The Truth Is (Fi-)tion: For Those Who Wanted A More Deeper Explanation
At the deepest level of human nature, “the truth is fiction” reflects our species’ ancient preference for manageable stories over raw, unstructured reality because pure reality is metabolically and psychologically expensive.
Humans are not primarily truth-seeking machines. We are narrative animals who evolved in small groups where shared myths, …
People keep this in mind. Under Article 70 of the Iraqi Constitution, major financial reforms specifically altering the exchange rate require a seated government and parliamentary consensus.
The factional disputes between Shia blocs and Kurdish parties over cabinet positions weren't just drama; they were a legal blockade.
The Sept 30 Convergence
This Timeline Now Makes Perfect Sense:
• August 17: EOs 14405/14406 …
People Hate That Most Of Them Chose Every Problem They Are Complaining About Today
They Want The Cabal To Be Blamed For Everything
They will enter a problem knowing all the pitfalls and still follow through and suffer the consequences and blame "The System".
They were either horny.
They were probably greedy.
They were likely desperate.
They were presumably high.
This Goes Back To The Famous Phrase "Build It An…
Arizona Is A Prime Hub For Human Trafficking
Police Chief Brian Chapman announced that an internal audit revealed potential misuse of the database by someone within the organization.
City officials stated that an initial review found no evidence that the privacy of any resident or member of the public was compromised.
So Ask Yourself One Thing
Why are the removing an entire system based off a person within the or…
Sorry Cabal You Still Lose:
The Deep State operates on the assumption that if you control the local police chief, the city council, and the physical surveillance infrastructure, you control the narrative.
That works when the only eyes in the sky are traffic cameras and police choppers. It falls apart completely when Space Force is overhead.
When POTUS said "we have cameras that can see anything," he wasn't talking…
We Mentioned This Earlier:
SEC would be way more strict on crypto regulation. Warren’s “not industry-written” line is pure D.C. extraction theater. She isn’t protecting consumers; she is protecting the bribery pipeline. When politicians write the rules, they write the escape hatches for themselves.
“Industry-written” in Warren’s lexicon means code written by developers that is mathematically absolute, permissionles…
Perez Hilton: You Know Many Would Not Be Surprised
Here Are A Few Reasons
Perez was born in Miami, Florida (a hotbed of Santería, Brujería, and CIA black ops), Perez was exposed to the occult early. Miami’s Cuban exile community is riddled with Palo Mayombe (a dark Afro-Caribbean magick system) and CIA-backed cults used for mind control experiments.
His mother, Teresita Lavandeira, was a devout Catholic but also d…
The Sovereign Currency Exemption:
You All Need To Understand This One Thing
The Clarity Act regulates digital assets, securities, and tokens. The Iraqi Dinar is a sovereign foreign currency. When Iraq drops the three zeros and pegs the new tokenized dinar to their gold, it enters the global market as a foreign exchange instrument, not a crypto security. Forex operations fall under Treasury and CFTC jurisdiction, no…
Why POTUS Is Unbothered About The Clarity Act:
1.4B crypto holdings creating an ethics conflict that stalls the bill. Let them. While the Democrats block the Clarity Act to "protect" the system from his wallet, they are accidentally freezing the Cabal's off-ramps.
If Trump pushed the bill hard, the Senate would just water it down with centralized carve-outs. By letting Thune stall, Trump forces the SEC to keep its …
They Are Circling The Drain:
John Thune punting the Clarity Act to September is standard Swamp delay tactics. He’s buying time for the banking lobby to carve out exemptions.
Their Goal Is Simple:
Redefine "decentralized" so narrowly that it still requires a centralized issuer, keeping the fiat on-ramps and off-ramps under Cabal control. They want to water it down into a regulatory licensing framework rather than a…
👍60❤19🔥13🙏7👏4🤔2🤬2
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @Prolotario1_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 66,913 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ariel” (@Prolotario1_Channel), 4,603 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Prolotario1_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
