Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ก๐—œ๐—” โ˜ แต–สฐสธหขโฑแ‘ซแต˜แต‰

Channel

๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ก๐—œ๐—” โ˜ แต–สฐสธหขโฑแ‘ซแต˜แต‰

@ProfRania

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

6,544subscribers

-256 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001643875275
TypeChannel
Username@ProfRania
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live17 October 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ProfRania

Topic

Politics & activism โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,5446,8376,690.52 September 2026 โ€” 6,800 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 6,792 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 6,712 subscribers12 September 2026 โ€” 6,622 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 6,826 subscribers28 September 2026 โ€” 6,837 subscribers5 October 2026 โ€” 6,698 subscribers11 October 2026 โ€” 6,629 subscribers14 October 2026 โ€” 6,584 subscribers17 October 2026 โ€” 6,544 subscribers2 September 202617 October 2026
10 measurements spanning 45 days, net -256. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 6,500โ€“6,881 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Oct 2026, 17:586,544-40
14 Oct 2026, 21:286,584-45
11 Oct 2026, 19:176,629-69
5 Oct 2026, 17:386,698-139
28 Sept 2026, 01:586,837+11
15 Sept 2026, 17:176,826+204
12 Sept 2026, 07:206,622-90
7 Sept 2026, 21:426,712-80
2 Sept 2026, 13:086,792-8
2 Sept 2026, 08:456,800first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

323 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค25077.4%
๐Ÿ‘175.26%
๐Ÿ˜175.26%
๐Ÿฅฐ144.33%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ113.41%
๐Ÿ“30.929%
๐Ÿคจ30.929%
๐Ÿ•Š20.619%
๐Ÿคก20.619%
๐Ÿคฃ20.619%
๐Ÿ†10.31%
๐Ÿ”ฅ10.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 17:32 UTC81 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Voice message

๐Ÿ”ด ุงู„ู…ูƒุชุณุจุงุช ุงู„ู‚ุจู„ูŠุฉ โ˜„๏ธ

โค6๐Ÿ˜3๐Ÿ“2

30 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC202 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Miss_RitadjVoice message

๐Ÿ™‚โ€โ†•๏ธ ูƒู„ู†ุง ูŠุฏู‹ุง ูˆุงุญุฏุฉ ๐Ÿซณ๐Ÿซด ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฟ ุงู„ู„ู‡ู… ุงุญูุธ ุงู„ุฌุฒุงุฆุฑ ูˆุฃู‡ู„ู‡ุง ๐Ÿคฒ๐Ÿปโค๏ธ

โค3๐Ÿฅฐ3โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2

28 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC322 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Douaa_s_Study

ุฌูŠุช ู†ุดุงุฑูƒูƒู… ุจุฑู†ุงู…ุฌ ุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ ู„ู„ุฃูŠุงู… ุงู„ุฌุงูŠุฉ ุจุฅุฐู† ุงู„ู„ู‡ ๐ŸŽฏโœจ ุฑุงุญ ู†ูƒูˆู† ู…ุนุงูƒู… ุฎุทูˆุฉ ุจุฎุทูˆุฉ ูˆู†ุจุงุฑุทุงุฌูŠ ู…ุนุงูƒู…: ๐Ÿ“š ู†ุตุงุฆุญ ูˆุชูˆุฌูŠู‡ุงุช ุชู†ุธูŠู…ูŠุฉ: ูƒูŠูุงู‡ ุชุจุฏุฃูˆุง ู‚ุฑุงูŠุชูƒู… ุตุญ ูˆุจุฏูˆู† ุชุดุชุช โฐ ุฎุทุท ูˆุชู†ุธูŠู… ูˆู‚ุช: ู†ู…ุงุฐุฌ ุฌุฏุงูˆู„ ุฏุฑุงุณูŠุฉ ุชุชู„ุงุฆู… ู…ุน ุฑูŠุชู… ูƒู„ ุทุงู„ุจ ๐Ÿ”ฅ ู…ุญุชูˆู‰ ุชุญููŠุฒูŠ ูˆุฏุนู… ู†ูุณูŠ: ุจุงุด ุชุทุฑุฏูˆุง ุงู„ุฎูˆู ูˆุงู„ุชุฑุฏุฏ ูˆุชูƒู…ู„ูˆุง ุจู†ูุณ ุงู„ุทุงู‚ุฉ ๐Ÿ’ฌ ุฅุฌุงุจุงุช ุนู„ู‰ ุงู†ุดุบุงู„ุงุชูƒู…: ุชุฎุตูŠุต ู…ุณุงุญุงุช ู„ุฃุณุฆู„ุชูƒู… ูˆู…ุดุงูƒู„ูƒู… ุงู„ุฏุฑุงุณูŠุฉ ูˆู†ุฌุงูˆุจูˆุง ุนู„ูŠู‡ุง ู…ุน ุจุนุถ ๐Ÿ“น ูˆุงูŠุถุง ู„ุงูŠูุงุช ููŠู‡ู… ู†ุตุงุฆุญ ูˆุชูˆุฌูŠู‡ุงุช ุจุฎุตูˆโ€ฆ

โค3

28 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC310 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Douaa_s_Study

๐Ÿ”ฅ ุชุถุงู…ู†ู‹ุง ู…ุน ุฌูŠุฌู„ ูˆุจุฌุงูŠุฉ ูˆูƒู„ ุงู„ูˆู„ุงูŠุงุช ุงู„ุชูŠ ู…ุณุชู‡ุง ุงู„ุญุฑุงุฆู‚ ๐Ÿค ู‚ู„ูˆุจู†ุง ู…ุน ูƒู„ ู…ู† ุชุถุฑุฑ ู…ู† ุงู„ุญุฑุงุฆู‚ ุงู„ุชูŠ ุดู‡ุฏุชู‡ุง ูˆู„ุงูŠุงุช ุงู„ุฌุฒุงุฆุฑ ุŒ ูˆู…ุน ุงู„ุนุงุฆู„ุงุช ุงู„ุชูŠ ุนุงุดุช ู„ุญุธุงุช ุตุนุจุฉ ูˆุฎุณุฑุช ุฌุฒุกู‹ุง ู…ู† ู…ู…ุชู„ูƒุงุชู‡ุง ุฃูˆ ู…ุตุฏุฑ ุฑุฒู‚ู‡ุง. ููŠ ู…ุซู„ ู‡ุฐู‡ ุงู„ุธุฑูˆูุŒ ุชุจู‚ู‰ ูˆู‚ูุฉ ุงู„ุชุถุงู…ู† ูˆุงู„ุฏุนู… ุงู„ุฅู†ุณุงู†ูŠ ูˆุงุฌุจู‹ุง ุนู„ูŠู†ุง ุฌู…ูŠุนู‹ุง. ู†ุณุฃู„ ุงู„ู„ู‡ ุฃู† ูŠุญูุธ ุฃู‡ู„ ุงู„ู…ู†ุทู‚ุฉุŒ ูˆุฃู† ูŠุนูˆู‘ุถ ูƒู„ ู…ู† ุชุถุฑุฑุŒ ูˆุฃู† ูŠู…ู†ู‘ ุนู„ู‰ ุงู„ุฌู…ูŠุน ุจุงู„ุณู„ุงู…ุฉ ูˆุงู„ุฃู…ุงู†. ๐Ÿคฒ ุงู„ู„ู‡ู… ุงุฑุญู… ู…ู† ุฑุญู„ุŒ ูˆุงุดู ู…ู† ุชุฃุฐู‰ุŒ ูˆุงุญูุธ ู…ู† ุจู‚ูŠุŒ ูˆุงุฌุจุฑ ู‚ู„ูˆโ€ฆ

โค6๐Ÿ•Š2โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1

11 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC917 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Douaa_s_StudyVoice message

๐Ÿงโ€โ™€ ุฃูˆู„ ุฎุทูˆุฉ ู„ู„ู†ุฌุงุญ... ุงุณู…ุนู‡ุง ู‚ุจู„ ู…ุง ุชุจุฏุฃ ุงู„ู…ุฑุงุฌุนุฉ! ๐Ÿ’ก

โค7๐Ÿ†1

11 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC966 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Douaa_s_StudyVoice message

ูƒูŠูุงุด ุชูƒูˆู† ู…ุนุงูŠุง ุฎุทูˆุฉ ุจุฎุทูˆุฉ ุญุชู‰ ูŠูˆู… ุงู„ุจูƒุงู„ูˆุฑูŠุงุŸ (ุชูุงุตูŠู„ ุงู„ู…ุชุงุจุนุฉ ุงู„ุฎุงุตุฉ) โœจ

โค12๐Ÿคก2

11 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTCโ‰ˆ1,010 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Douaa_s_Study

ุชูุงุนู„ูˆุง ุจุงุด ู†ุฒูŠุฏ ู†ุญุทู„ูƒู… ุจุงู‚ูŠ ุงู„ุชูุงุตูŠู„ ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜

โค9๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ”ฅ1

22 Jul 2026, 21:33 UTCโ‰ˆ1,310 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Douaa_s_StudyPoll

ุทู„ุจุฉ ุจุงูƒ 2027 ุฑุงูƒู… ู‡ู†ุง ุŸ

  1. ุงูŠู‡ ุฑุงู†ุง ู‡ู†ุง ูˆู…ุชุญู…ุณูŠู† ๐Ÿ˜‚24%
  2. ู†ูˆ ุญู†ุง ุฏูุนุฉ 2026 ูƒู…ู„ู†ุง ู…ุน ู„ุจุงูƒ ๐Ÿ˜29%
  3. ุญู†ุง ุชุงุน 2026 ูˆุฑุงุญ ู†ุนุงูˆุฏูˆ ๐Ÿ’”52%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Jul 2026, 21:33 UTCโ‰ˆ1,490 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Douaa_s_Study

ุชูุงุนู„ูˆ ุจุงุด ู†ุญุทู„ูƒู… ู…ู†ุดูˆุฑ ุจุฎุตูˆุต ุงู„ุชุนุงู…ู„ ู…ุน ุนุทู„ุฉ ุงู„ุตูŠู ุจุงู„ู†ุณุจุฉ ู„ู„ุทู„ุจุฉ ุงู„ุฌุฏุฏ ุงู„ู…ู‚ุจู„ูŠู† ุนู„ู‰ ุดู‡ุงุฏุฉ ุจูƒุงู„ูˆุฑูŠุง 2027

โค26๐Ÿ‘5

22 Jul 2026, 21:33 UTCโ‰ˆ1,390 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Douaa_s_Study

https://t.me/bacalgeriabac ุดุงุฑูƒูˆ ุฑุงุจุท ุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ ู…ุน ุฒู…ู„ุงุฆูƒู… ู„ูŠ ุนู†ุฏู‡ู… ุจุงูƒ 2027 ุฑุงู‡ ุฌุงูŠ ุงู„ุฌุฏูŠุฏ ๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿ˜ ูˆุฌุฏูˆ ุฑูˆุงุญูƒู…

โค9๐Ÿ˜1

8 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTCโ‰ˆ1,860 views37 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Bac_with_u_2026

๐Ÿ”ด#ูˆุฒุงุฑุฉ_ุงู„ุชุฑุจูŠุฉ_ุงู„ูˆุทู†ูŠุฉ : ุงู„ุฅุนู„ุงู† ุนู† ู†ุชุงุฆุฌ #ุดู‡ุงุฏุฉ_ุงู„ุจูƒุงู„ูˆุฑูŠุง ุฏูˆุฑุฉ 2026 ุณูŠูƒูˆู† ูŠูˆู… ุงู„ุฃุญุฏ 12 ุฌูˆูŠู„ูŠุฉ 2026 ุนู„ู‰ ุงู„ุณุงุนุฉ ุงู„ุนุงุดุฑุฉ ุตุจุงุญุง. โœ”๏ธ

โค37

16 May 2026, 19:59 UTCโ‰ˆ3,510 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

ูƒูŠูุงุด ุชุถู…ู† 7/7 ูุงู„ุจู†ุงุก ุงู„ููƒุฑูŠ ู…ู… ุชูƒูˆู† 0 ูู„ูˆู†ู‚ู„ูŠ ุฌู…ูŠุน ุงู„ุงุณุฑุงุฑ ูู‡ุฐ ุงู„ู…ู†ุดูˆุฑ ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ˜

โค18โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿ˜5

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ProfRania. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 21:33 UTCAnonymous Poll640 voters

ุทู„ุจุฉ ุจุงูƒ 2027 ุฑุงูƒู… ู‡ู†ุง ุŸ

  1. ุงูŠู‡ ุฑุงู†ุง ู‡ู†ุง ูˆู…ุชุญู…ุณูŠู† ๐Ÿ˜‚24%
  2. ู†ูˆ ุญู†ุง ุฏูุนุฉ 2026 ูƒู…ู„ู†ุง ู…ุน ู„ุจุงูƒ ๐Ÿ˜29%
  3. ุญู†ุง ุชุงุน 2026 ูˆุฑุงุญ ู†ุนุงูˆุฏูˆ ๐Ÿ’”52%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

๐‘ซ๐’๐’–๐’‚๐’‚โ€™๐’” ๐‘บ๐’•๐’–๐’…๐’š๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿš€
@Douaa_s_Study ยท 21,205
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 34 here โ€” alongside 33 others โ€” read 4 October 2026
ุงู„ุจุงูƒ ููŠ ุงู„ุฌูŠุจ | bac feljib
@bacfeljib ยท 33,799
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 71 here โ€” alongside 70 others โ€” read 8 September 2026
prof_abdou_physique Bac 2026 ๐Ÿฅ‡ุงู„ุฃุณุชุงุฐ ุนุจุฏูˆ ุฑุถูˆุงู†
@prof_abdou ยท 34,402
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 79 here โ€” alongside 78 others โ€” read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—™ ๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ก๐—œ๐—” โ˜ แต–สฐสธหขโฑแ‘ซแต˜แต‰โ€ (@ProfRania), 6,544 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProfRania.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.