Build your AI team.
Launch OpenClaw agents in minutes.
Run them 24/7.
Control them from Telegram.
Website: https://PrivateClawd.com
Chat with OpenClaw: @PrivateClawd_bot
Follow us on X.com: https://x.com/PrivateClawd
Created
8 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 74 days, net +9,257. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,354–45,389 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Oct 2026, 02:39
44,000
+108
20 Oct 2026, 01:47
43,892
+135
19 Oct 2026, 00:46
43,757
+296
17 Oct 2026, 22:01
43,461
+116
16 Oct 2026, 21:16
43,345
+100
15 Oct 2026, 21:57
43,245
+175
14 Oct 2026, 21:59
43,070
+151
13 Oct 2026, 13:07
42,919
+406
9 Oct 2026, 11:56
42,513
+325
5 Oct 2026, 03:58
42,188
+675
28 Sept 2026, 12:15
41,513
+1,468
17 Sept 2026, 18:58
40,045
+213
15 Sept 2026, 15:58
39,832
+233
13 Sept 2026, 23:01
39,599
+257
12 Sept 2026, 04:19
39,342
+320
9 Sept 2026, 21:36
39,022
+291
6 Sept 2026, 16:21
38,731
+321
4 Sept 2026, 05:58
38,410
+185
2 Sept 2026, 16:16
38,225
+139
1 Sept 2026, 13:32
38,086
first reading
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 140 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
2
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
877 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5222474515887435551
397
45.3%
🔥
257
29.3%
🐳
223
25.4%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 877 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 10 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 2 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PrivateClawd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 3 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2026 to 10 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
👥 On March 6, in Shenzhen, China, nearly 1,000 people lined up outside Tencent headquarters to have OpenClaw, a popular open-source software for AI agents, installed on their computers.
The event was organized by Tencent's cloud division, where company staff helped install the software for developers, retirees, homemakers, students, and AI enthusiasts - for free.
Tencent’s initiative highlights the growing interest…
🦀 Welcome to PrivateClawd
PrivateClawd lets you deploy private OpenClaw AI agents that run 24/7 in the cloud.
No servers.
No complicated setup.
No DevOps.
In under a minute you can launch an OpenClaw agent that can browse the web, run code, automate tasks, and chat via Telegram or WhatsApp.
Each agent runs in its own private cloud environment.
You can create one agent or a whole team of agents.
Manage and chat …
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @PrivateClawd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PrivateClawd 🦀” (@PrivateClawd), 44,000 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PrivateClawd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.