Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فـ.ـــلـ.ـسطــ.ــيـن نــيـ.ــوز

Channel

فـ.ـــلـ.ـسطــ.ــيـن نــيـ.ــوز

@PlastineNews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,225subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002184946289
TypeChannel
Username@PlastineNews
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PlastineNews

Growth

1,2231,2261,224.56 August 2026 — 1,224 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,224 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,223 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,226 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,225 subscribers1,2256 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,223–1,226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:541,225-1
14 Aug 2026, 09:551,226+3
7 Aug 2026, 13:001,223-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:011,224no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:481,224first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.807%
avg views ÷ 1,225 subscribers
Avg views / post
9.9
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (6 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total178
Reactions total29
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2379.3%
🥴413.8%
😡13.45%
🤪13.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTCviews —

فـ.ـــلـ.ـسطــ.ــيـن نــيـ.ــوز pinned «ملګرو پورته نشراتو ته یو یو لایک ورکړۍ 👍❤ مونږ دلایک شوق نه لرو خو داچی زمونږ نشرات دوامداره روان وی نو لایک موهِم دی زمونږ چینل به له خطره بچ وی ډیره مننه☺»

6 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ملګرو پورته نشراتو ته یو یو لایک ورکړۍ 👍❤ مونږ دلایک شوق نه لرو خو داچی زمونږ نشرات دوامداره روان وی نو لایک موهِم دی زمونږ چینل به له خطره بچ وی ډیره مننه☺

1

6 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

له ټرمپ څخه وپوښتل شول: پوښتنه زېلېنسکي وايي چې هېواد یې په بېړنۍ توګه اوږد واټن ویشتونکو توغندیو ته اړتیا لري آیا دا به ورته ورکړل شي ټرمپ: ښه موږ هم توغندیو ته اړتیا لرو بایډن هغه ته ډېر توغندي ورکړي دي

1

6 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC7 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

سعودي عربستان موږ د یمن د وسله والو ځواکونو د اتلو شهیدانو له کورنیو سره د خواخوږۍ مراتب وړاندې کوو چې د حوثیانو د غدارانه برید له امله وژل شوي دي

1🤪1

6 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC7 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ټرمپ: تر اوسه د هرمز تنګي په اړه هېڅ تړون نشته

1🥴1

6 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC7 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ټرمپ: موږ په دوامداره توګه نورو مهماتو ته اړتیا لرو

1🥴1

6 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC7 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ټرمپ د ایران په اړه: زه له ایران سره په خبرو اترو کې ښکېل یم چارې ښه پر مخ روانې دي

1🥴1

6 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC8 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ټرمپ د ایران په اړه: زه فکر کوم چې جګړه به ډېر ژر پای ته ورسېږي

1🥴1

6 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC8 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

د عراق پولې ته څېرمه د کویټ د تېلو څاه‌ګانو مشعلونه مړه کړل شول د راتلونکي احتمالي برید د وېرې له امله

2

6 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC8 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

د یمن په مأرب ولایت کې د انټرنېټ خدمت درېدلی په داسې حال کې چې انصارالله د سعودي عربستان د ملاتړو ځواکونو پر پوځي ځایونو د توغندیو او بې‌پیلوټه الوتکو بریدونه کړي دي.

2

6 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC8 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

د سعودي عربستان څخه د امریکا د تېلو واردات صفر ته راکم شوي دا په تېرو ۴۰ کلونو کې لومړی ځل دی

2

6 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#عاجل له ایران څخه د کښتیو ضد توغندی د هرمز تنګي پر لور توغول شوی دی.

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @PlastineNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 95,849 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فـ.ـــلـ.ـسطــ.ــيـن نــيـ.ــوز” (@PlastineNews), 1,225 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PlastineNews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.