Channel
@PjlCpq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,485subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003616909761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PjlCpq |
| Description | 车友真实评价 |
| First recorded | 7 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PjlCpq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 17:22 | 1,485 | no change |
| 7 Oct 2026, 16:47 | 1,485 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 3 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (3 October 2026 – 5 October 2026) |
| Views total | 4,742 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Oct 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#投稿 这个夜晚，终于早些收工。心里念着那位老师，已有一段时日了。 推开门的一刻，又见那张牵动我许久的容颜。寒暄几句，我便去沐浴。水声未歇，再出来时，她已换上一袭黑丝，安静地坐在那里。 目光落下的一瞬，心神几乎被拉走——那双腿像是把时间都绕住了。我没忍住，凑上前想吻她，她却轻轻推我去躺好。中间说了什么，已记不真切了。 她俯下身来，从那里开始，一点一点，慢慢往下。很久没有这样的时刻了，身体竟微微发颤。她抬眼看了看我，舌尖继续向下游走。那一刻，像是有什么东西快要从身体里漫出来，几乎压不住。 我把她拉进怀里，换我来吻。指尖触到她时，她也不由得轻颤了一下。她说，轻些，那里受不住。 没几个来回，便已到了尽头。 但真正让人回味的，不是那一瞬。是她从头到尾的不急不缓，不催，也不问。那种恰到好处的分寸，像一首节奏妥帖的曲子。 走出门时，整个人是轻的。不是疲惫，是舒服。 下次，还会再来。 from 匿名
#投稿 我是看到返现100来的。不得不说。确实老招牌的服务质量还是很顶。有点出乎我的意料了。特别是水床。太有特色了 第一次玩 太刺激了。 还会二刷的 from 柬埔寨房产中介
#投稿 怎么说呢 第一次玩水床，技师中规中矩还是不错的 比较新奇 很有体验感 duang duang duang的 哈哈 刺激，在妹妹舌头的旋转下 很快缴枪了 但是妹妹还不停 爽死我了 from 雨崽
#投稿 水床yyds，二刷了 嘿嘿嘿，这家服务整体令人满意，环境氛围轻松惬意，偶有低语与笑声交织其间，更添几分人间烟火气。技师外形端正，举止得体，手法娴熟而富有章法，显然经过专业训练。服务过程张弛有度，时有舒缓放松之感，令人身心俱宁。久坐劳顿之人，于此小憩一番，亦有助于调理筋骨、舒展气血。总体而言，体验颇佳，诚可谓“歪瑞古德” from 一枪入魂
#投稿 1 from 匿名
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @PjlCpq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“潘金莲车评反馈” (@PjlCpq), 1,485 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PjlCpq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.