Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Patrik Baab ⋆

Channel

Patrik Baab ⋆

@PatrikBaab0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

75,737subscribers

-8,121 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002002482622
TypeChannel
Username@PatrikBaab0
DescriptionPatrik Baab Offizielle Kanal für YouTube-Videos, Krypto-Feeds, Kontoverwaltung.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 October 2026
Measurements held37
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/PatrikBaab0

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

66,24194,93880,589.57 August 2026 — 83,858 subscribers7 August 2026 — 83,649 subscribers9 August 2026 — 82,085 subscribers9 August 2026 — 81,181 subscribers11 August 2026 — 79,962 subscribers12 August 2026 — 79,205 subscribers12 August 2026 — 78,694 subscribers14 August 2026 — 76,971 subscribers15 August 2026 — 75,625 subscribers17 August 2026 — 73,288 subscribers18 August 2026 — 72,221 subscribers19 August 2026 — 70,439 subscribers20 August 2026 — 69,669 subscribers21 August 2026 — 68,959 subscribers22 August 2026 — 67,731 subscribers24 August 2026 — 66,241 subscribers25 August 2026 — 93,683 subscribers26 August 2026 — 93,084 subscribers27 August 2026 — 92,726 subscribers28 August 2026 — 94,938 subscribers29 August 2026 — 94,120 subscribers30 August 2026 — 93,282 subscribers31 August 2026 — 93,032 subscribers1 September 2026 — 91,538 subscribers2 September 2026 — 90,914 subscribers4 September 2026 — 90,439 subscribers6 September 2026 — 88,743 subscribers9 September 2026 — 86,320 subscribers12 September 2026 — 85,164 subscribers13 September 2026 — 83,738 subscribers15 September 2026 — 82,667 subscribers17 September 2026 — 82,050 subscribers26 September 2026 — 78,631 subscribers4 October 2026 — 77,607 subscribers9 October 2026 — 77,006 subscribers13 October 2026 — 76,059 subscribers14 October 2026 — 75,737 subscribers75,7377 August 202614 October 2026
37 measurements spanning 68 days, net -8,121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,936–99,243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Oct 2026, 18:0875,737-322
13 Oct 2026, 07:2076,059-947
9 Oct 2026, 00:1777,006-601
4 Oct 2026, 15:5977,607-1,024
26 Sept 2026, 12:3578,631-3,419
17 Sept 2026, 11:1982,050-617
15 Sept 2026, 07:3782,667-1,071
13 Sept 2026, 18:1583,738-1,426
12 Sept 2026, 02:5585,164-1,156
9 Sept 2026, 21:4086,320-2,423
6 Sept 2026, 17:4188,743-1,696
4 Sept 2026, 04:1990,439-475
2 Sept 2026, 18:4290,914-624
1 Sept 2026, 18:1891,538-1,494
31 Aug 2026, 15:4393,032-250
30 Aug 2026, 16:4793,282-838
29 Aug 2026, 14:2594,120-818
28 Aug 2026, 16:2494,938+2,212
27 Aug 2026, 15:3792,726-358
26 Aug 2026, 15:3593,084first reading

Engagement

1,613 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 139 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.94%
avg views ÷ 75,737 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,010
694 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.019%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
694
of 1,613 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 694 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026
Posts held1,613 (7 August 2026 – 14 October 2026)
Views total4,171,817
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Oct 2026, 03:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈16,400
Videos
≈2,390
Links
≈3,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10h 00m
Average length
8m 13s

Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 46 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2334.8%
👍1827.3%
🔥1015.2%
💯57.58%
🤬46.06%
🤪34.55%
🖕11.52%
🤣11.52%
🤮11.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 2 September 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Oct 2026, 14:29 UTC≈10,000 viewsread 15 October 2026

Immer mehr Staaten sind Pleite und implementieren neue Steuern: Deutschland 🇩🇪 Zuckersteuer und eventuell Kryptosteuer Niederlande 🇳🇱 will 36% Steuer auf eigenverwahrtes Gold und Silber sowie Krypto auf unrealisierte Gewinne Frankreich 🇫🇷 will eine 31,4 % Steuer auf Umwandlungen von Kryptowährungen in Stablecoins.

14 Oct 2026, 14:29 UTC≈10,000 viewsread 15 October 2026
Photo

Bitcoin: „Kurs Richtung 84.000 Dollar – Fed-Vertreter sieht 2027 keine Zinserhöhungen!" Aussagen von New Yorks Notenbankchef John Williams schwächen den Dollar und geben Krypto und asiatischen Börsen Auftrieb. Die Eckdaten: • Kurs: Bitcoin steigt um 1,5% auf knapp 83.900 $ – Zcash führt mit rund +7% • Auslöser: Williams hält eine weitere Erhöhung 2026 für möglich – 2027 aber keine mehr • Ausblick: Die US-Inflations…

14 Oct 2026, 14:29 UTC≈10,000 viewsread 15 October 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/9FmH0GaRsR4?si=Zn5IqcOoGRomj0HV

14 Oct 2026, 14:29 UTC≈10,000 viewsread 15 October 2026
Photo

Die Negativ-Auslese geht weiter https://youtu.be/MbC37Cr0vXw

14 Oct 2026, 14:29 UTC≈10,000 viewsread 15 October 2026

Investieren und Traden und dabei Gewinn zu machen, während man investiert und tradet, ist sehr süß. Glaub mir, es ist sehr, sehr, sehr süß. Erstens hast du Seelenfrieden, weil du weißt, dass du mit mir zu tun hast. Deine Investition ist bei mir sicher. Ich bin eine bekannte Person, und das bedeutet, dass dein Geld zu 100 % sicher ist und du Seelenfrieden hast. Zweitens weißt du, dass ich ein Experte auf diesem Gebi…

14 Oct 2026, 14:29 UTC≈10,000 viewsread 15 October 2026
Photo

Strive will 500 Millionen Dollar für Bitcoin einsammeln Der Bitcoin-Treasury-Konzern Strive (ASST) bringt eine neue Vorzugsaktie namens SATS an den Markt. Geplant ist der Verkauf von 5 Millionen Anteilen zu je 100 US-Dollar, insgesamt 500 Mio. US-Dollar. Das Geld soll vor allem in Bitcoin fließen, daneben in ertragbringende Anlagen oder Aktienrückkäufe. SATS zahlt eine feste Dividende von 15 Prozent pro Jahr, tägli…

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,613 posts we hold for @PatrikBaab0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Oct 2026, 07:06 UTCAnonymous Poll3 voters

Umfrage: Würdet ihr ein Skigebiet wegen hoher Kosten aufgeben❓

  1. Ja, wenn es keinen Gewinn mehr abwirft0%
  2. Nein, ich würde um jeden Lift kämpfen0%
  3. Nur, wenn es gute Alternativen vor Ort gibt67%
  4. Meine Antwort steht in den Kommentaren33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 2 September 2026 to 14 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Patrik Baab ⋆” (@PatrikBaab0), 75,737 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PatrikBaab0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.