Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Справедливый TIJENT

Channel

Справедливый TIJENT

@PRIJENT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,606subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001460156390
TypeChannel
Username@PRIJENT
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/PRIJENT

Growth

1,6061,6121,60927 August 2026 — 1,608 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,608 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,610 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,612 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,609 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,606 subscribers27 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 13 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,605–1,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 10:211,606-3
4 Sept 2026, 03:181,609-3
31 Aug 2026, 08:241,612+2
28 Aug 2026, 16:131,610+2
27 Aug 2026, 16:451,608no change
27 Aug 2026, 16:301,608first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
83.5%
avg views ÷ 1,606 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held18 (21 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total13,404
Reactions total515
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,253 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
48038.3%
🔥13510.8%
🤯13410.7%
😁987.82%
❤‍🔥695.51%
💯635.03%
🐳493.91%
🍾383.03%
👍352.79%
🤩342.71%
🥰292.31%
🎉201.60%
🍌161.28%
🤣141.12%
90.718%
👏90.718%
💋80.638%
🕊60.479%
🏆40.319%
😍20.16%
1 further kind10.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,253 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC859 views41 reactionsread 27 August 2026

https://youtu.be/qWv-vMR4uu4

31❤‍🔥9🤯1

21 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC885 views59 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

37🔥14🥰4🍌2❤‍🔥1🤯1

18 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,150 views30 reactionsread 27 August 2026

В сборке более 400 модов а также ресурс паков и датапаков которые не дадут вам заскучать. Автор специально переписал и переделал некоторые аспекты чтобы они смотрелись гармонично. Недавно сборка получила огромное обновление включающее в себя легендарные моды (Ice and Fire, Twilight forest, Mowzie's Mobs) а также улучшение буквально ВСЕХ аспектов игры. Все биомы и измерения наполнены приключениями опасностями и луто

🥰195🐳3🏆2❤‍🔥1

18 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC952 views42 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

В комментариях под последним постом видел, что некоторые просили для майна больше мотивации исследовать мир, новые данжи измерения и так далее. Я думаю от моджанг таких добавлений придётся подождать, а получить их здесь и сейчас вы сможете в сборке FrashCrtaft Fantasy.

🔥26👍7🥰52❤‍🔥1🐳1

14 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈1,590 views79 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Ох, что я наделал ... 2

😁5614❤‍🔥5🤯3🤩1

14 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,570 views66 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Что вас бесит в майнкрафт когда вы играйте в него?

54🍌8🤩4

13 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈1,690 views57 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Какой нафек бумеранг?

😁34🤯13👏4🤩32🐳1

10 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC≈2,230 views96 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

55🍾17😁8🤣6🤯5🤩3🏆1🐳1

10 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,820 views24 reactionsread 27 August 2026

https://www.twitch.tv/tijent_stream

20🐳4

6 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC≈2,290 views97 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Ох, что я наделал...

🤯85💋4🍾3👏211🐳1

30 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC≈2,750 views68 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Я начал стрим!

🔥42🤯136🍾2🕊2🤩2🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @PRIJENT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ModsCraft — Майнкрафт
@modscraft · 33,998
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 3 September 2026
Павук (swag)
@pavuk228 · 42,150
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
АХА ГОТОВИТ
@axagotovit · 29,114
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 September 2026
Корова из майнкрафта / Бурёночек
@Burenochek · 45,086
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Справедливый TIJENT” (@PRIJENT), 1,606 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PRIJENT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.