3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,458–6,466 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 20:33
6,459
-6
9 Aug 2026, 15:17
6,465
+3
9 Aug 2026, 07:30
6,462
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 6,459 subscribers
Avg views / post
682
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
23 (28 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
15,690
Reactions total
600
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
600 reactions across 23 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
356
59.3%
❤🔥
114
19.0%
💘
34
5.67%
🎉
19
3.17%
👏
14
2.33%
⚡
8
1.33%
💯
8
1.33%
💋
7
1.17%
🙏
7
1.17%
🐳
6
1.00%
🔥
6
1.00%
🕊
6
1.00%
😍
6
1.00%
🏆
4
0.667%
🤣
2
0.333%
🤩
2
0.333%
🦄
1
0.167%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 600reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 23 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PHT88. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
-
لا تعطل إدراكك قبول الحقيقة والإختيار أخف بكثير من انخفاض المشاعر والتحكم ✨
أحد اكثر الاشياء اللي يقلل فيها الإنسان من نفسه لما يعطل إدراكه.. لما يكون مُدرك لأمر ويرقع إدراكه تحت اي مُسمى
وفيه فرق كبير ما بين الظنون والتوقعات.. والإدراك
الإدراك مشابه للحدس لكنك ما تسعى له ولا يجي بصورة كنه رسالة شعورية أو حلم أو شيء تحسه، أو تشوفه، أو تسمعه.. لا شيء كذا لحاله بدون جهد ولا سعي ولا وصف وقد يشارك الجسد فيه لما يرف…
قريبًا بسوي قناة جديدة على تيليقرام، بكون بمساحة أكبر إني أحكي وأشارككم بشكل يرضيني أكثر إن شاء الله 💃
أعتقد إنها بتكون القناة العامة بالنسخة الرابعة، القناة هذي ما قصرت لها +4 اعوام بكل حلاوتها وجمالها، واعتقد في وحدة سنة وفيه وحدة سنتين أو حولهم
سوو.. استعدوا لرحلة جديدة ومكان جديد ممتع لطيف لين سهل مفيد يجنن 💃🤗
+ اللي ما دخل بقروب الحب تبع المحتوى يدخل 🌸
كثير من معتقدات اللاوعي يكون مرتبط بالمعاناة وللأسف كثير مرات ك حيلة دفاعية نستخدمها ع إنها قصة، هوية، كفاح إلى أخره من المفاهيم والمسميات الرنانة
كمثال:
- اعاني لكي انتمي لعائلة
- اعاني لأحصل على وظيفة
- اعاني من اجل ان اكون حقيقتي
- اعاني لكي يرضى علي الخالق
لكن بالحقيقة فينا نتجاوز الكثير من المعاناة إذا بطلنا نتغنى فيها، وقررنا تغييرها، وصار يعجبنا أكثر ( أنا غيرت ) بدل ( ما قدرت وحاولت )
صندوق المعانأة معتم، …
مساء الحب والرضا 💘
صار متاح تسجيل جلسة الغرام الآن 💞
كانت جلسة لطيفة ومن بُعد اخر.. طلبت من الله فيها:
تحرير الأنماط والسلوكيات الغير داعمة بالعلاقات، تنزيل المعاني الإلهية للإستحقاق، الحب، الإرتباط وجذب الشريك الأنسب، العمل على تحرير مشاعر الرفض، الهجر، الخيانة، الإهمال، الألم والتعب، تجاوز صعوبات التواصل لفظيًا وشعوريًا، تعزيز مشاعر العزيمة والإرادة لبناء هوية تدعم تجلي الشريك الأنسب، والقدرة على إعطاء الحب واستقب…
- اسهام -
مساء الفل لأرواحكم 🤍
أنا زينب أقدم جلسات بتقنيات طاقية للمال وخط الزمن
وحابة أعلمكم عن الجلسة الجماعية الجاية
نغمة المال 🎼
جلسة طاقية تعمل على تنقية وشحن طاقة المال لديك وخلق مساحة أكبر لاستقبال الوفرة.
تفاصيل الجلسة:
- يوم الجمعة 7 أغسطس
- 5:30 مساءً بتوقيت السعودية
- بث مباشر عبر التيلقرام لمدة نصف ساعة تقريباً
- الجلسة بتكون متاحة لمدة 24 ساعة لإعادة الإستماع
مستعد لاحتمالات أكثر ؟ وفرة ؟
الت…
هاي يومكم لطيف وحلو يا قمر 💘
متاح موعد اليوم لجلسة حدس اللي بدوو حياه الله
https://maysaasoul.com/product/intuition/
❤10🤣2
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @PHT88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
أ/ نوف لغة انجليزية ✨🤍 @NF_English1N · 503,408 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“البهاء 🧿” (@PHT88), 6,459 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PHT88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
