Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PES 2017 PATCH 2026

Channel

PES 2017 PATCH 2026

@PES_2017_UZ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22,343subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001319928015
TypeChannel
Username@PES_2017_UZ
DescriptionThis channel created with ❤️ from 🇺🇿 Uzbekistan
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PES_2017_UZ

Growth

22,32322,34822,335.57 August 2026 — 22,332 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,323 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,334 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,329 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,328 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,334 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,327 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,345 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,346 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,340 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,334 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,338 subscribers23 August 2026 — 22,345 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,346 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,348 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,343 subscribers22,3437 August 202626 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 19 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,319–22,352 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 21:5822,343-5
25 Aug 2026, 22:1822,348+2
24 Aug 2026, 22:2522,346+1
23 Aug 2026, 09:1622,345+7
21 Aug 2026, 17:3522,338+4
20 Aug 2026, 13:1822,334-6
19 Aug 2026, 13:5622,340-6
17 Aug 2026, 12:0522,346+1
16 Aug 2026, 03:2522,345+18
14 Aug 2026, 16:4522,327-7
13 Aug 2026, 09:2522,334+6
12 Aug 2026, 12:2422,328-1
11 Aug 2026, 09:1522,329-5
9 Aug 2026, 07:5322,334+11
8 Aug 2026, 05:0822,323-9
7 Aug 2026, 12:4622,332first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.4%
avg views ÷ 22,343 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,990
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.507%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held15 (7 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total14,930
Reactions total69
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,360
Videos
16
Links
1,070

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

246 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12550.8%
🔥5221.1%
😁176.91%
👏135.28%
❤‍🔥104.07%
👍83.25%
💔52.03%
🥰52.03%
🤩41.63%
😍31.22%
💊10.407%
😢10.407%
😴10.407%
🤔10.407%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,270 views17 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

What do you think about this guys? @UltimatePatch 😍

🔥133🥰1

25 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

#Advertisement 🏗 Qurilish loyihangiz uchun kerakli barcha jihozlarni bir joydan toping! • Lesa • Koreskiy Opalubka • Meshalka • Dvijok (Generator) • Bayok Arenda uchun ko'plab instrumentlar @Lesachi_Abdulloh

20 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC≈3,610 views13 reactionsread 27 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

9🔥4

20 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC≈3,440 views11 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

PES 2017 Official Kitpack 2026/2027 Update v15 – The creators have released the fifteenth set of official kits for the 2026 season teams of Pro Evolution Soccer 2017. ㅤ 🔲 New Official Kitpack 2026/2027 V15 ✅ 🔍 How to install : 📲 Extract the file 📄 Copy CPK File to Pro Evolution Soccer 2017\download ▶️ Generate with DpFileList Generator ✅ Done! 🫂 Credits: EsLaM 🖼 Preview: EsLaM ❓ Compatible with all patche

8🔥3

14 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC≈5,280 views28 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Ultimate Patch: Standard Edition🏆 @UltimatePatch - Follow for more ! ✅

18🔥5😁3🥰2

19 Jul 2026, 22:04 UTC≈11,000 views18 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😁124😢1😴1

19 Jul 2026, 22:02 UTC≈10,100 views5 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤩41

19 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC≈9,670 views20 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

VAMOSSS ARGENTINAAA 🇦🇷🔥 If Argentina becomes champions today, I'll tell my crush that I love her 💯 @PES_2017_UZ

15🔥4💊1

13 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC≈11,200 views32 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Rebranding. After many years, we decided to change our website identity and its design. New Look, New Things are Coming Soon ⏳ 📥Visit and download mods - https://www.jdpro.xyz

12👏12🔥7👍1

Signed Jahongir

10 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC≈10,600 views15 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @UltimatePatchPhoto

#FIFAWorldCup #PES2017 FIFA World Cup 2026 official scoreboard version 2 with more realistic changes Features - Add New menus - Update VAR - Update Scorebaord - Add More National Flags - Add Pause Menu - Update Referee Kits - Add Substations Board There's Two version in one file CPK & Sider Download Link : https://www.up-4ever.net/yf3uf63td09c

8😍3👍2👏1🤔1

9 Jul 2026, 18:14 UTC≈8,760 views19 reactionsread 25 August 2026

If Morocco beats France 2-0 today, I will tell my crush that I'm deeply in love with her.

❤‍🔥10💔53👍1

7 Jul 2026, 21:53 UTC≈8,670 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

7🔥3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @PES_2017_UZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 84,169 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PES 2017 PATCH 2026” (@PES_2017_UZ), 22,343 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PES_2017_UZ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.