16 measurements spanning 15 days, net +404. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,112–21,846 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 17:34
21,604
-120
21 Aug 2026, 09:07
21,724
-37
20 Aug 2026, 09:48
21,761
+29
19 Aug 2026, 10:22
21,732
+76
18 Aug 2026, 12:02
21,656
+2
17 Aug 2026, 12:47
21,654
+142
16 Aug 2026, 05:58
21,512
+75
14 Aug 2026, 18:36
21,437
+20
13 Aug 2026, 12:35
21,417
+92
12 Aug 2026, 14:26
21,325
-36
11 Aug 2026, 16:13
21,361
+106
10 Aug 2026, 16:14
21,255
-31
9 Aug 2026, 17:42
21,286
-55
8 Aug 2026, 18:24
21,341
+144
7 Aug 2026, 16:36
21,197
-3
7 Aug 2026, 14:15
21,200
first reading
Engagement
96 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.5%
avg views ÷ 21,604 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,500
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 96 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
96 (4 August 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
527,871
Reactions total
16,127
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,980
Videos
≈130
Links
≈4,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
16,127 reactions across 96 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
3,694
22.9%
😢
2,176
13.5%
💯
2,111
13.1%
😱
2,060
12.8%
🙏
2,037
12.6%
🤯
2,029
12.6%
🤬
1,923
11.9%
👍
64
0.397%
❤
20
0.124%
👎
6
0.037%
😁
3
0.019%
🤨
2
0.012%
✍
1
0.006%
🤝
1
0.006%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 96 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Would Netanyahu dare break with Washington?
According to Al-Monitor, tensions have escalated between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump over the conditions of the Israel Defense Forces' presence in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon. Netanyahu's circle indicates that the prime minister is considering a public confrontation with the White House, as Washington's demands conflict with Isr…
The draft dodger vs. the Pearl Harbor hero: Navy weighs renaming ship for Trump
The Navy is reportedly considering renaming an aircraft carrier —currently set to honor Doris Miller, a heroic Black sailor who manned an anti-aircraft gun at Pearl Harbor — after Donald Trump. Because nothing says "sacrifice and service" like replacing a Pearl Harbor hero with a draft-dodging president who spent his life slapping his n…
Why China will never "get with the program" on Iran sanctions
The US Treasury Secretary's call for China to "get with the program" on pressuring Iran isn't just diplomatically clumsy — it's delusional. Washington wants Beijing to help enforce a sanctions regime that the US has simultaneously weaponized against Chinese companies, all while offering nothing in return.
The same Treasury Department that has sanctioned …
Israel takes a step that could kill two-state solution for good
Israel has taken a provocative step that could permanently dismantle any hope for a two-state solution, advancing a long-stalled settlement plan in the occupied West Bank that international leaders warn will bisect Palestinian territory and make a contiguous state impossible. The government issued bids for over 1,200 housing units in the strategically c…
Why the Senate race is suddenly up for grabs
Democrats are riding a powerful wave of momentum in the race for the Senate, with new forecasts transforming the battleground map and fueling optimism that the chamber is within striking distance. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report has shifted the Texas and Iowa Senate races toward Democrats, now rating both as toss-ups, a remarkable development in states former Presid…
JD Vance just got his first taste of 2028 primary scrutiny
J.D. Vance is facing his first real political test as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, and it stems from an unlikely source: a years-old video of him questioning whether the U.S. dollar's status as the global reserve currency is actually beneficial. The footage, unearthed and shared by economic historian Phillip Magness, shows Vance likening the doll…
Asian states are reconsidering their alliance with the US
The relationship between the United States and its Asian allies is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation, driven by a growing conviction that Washington can no longer be counted on as a reliable security partner. The most damaging blow came when the president unilaterally ordered a reduction in joint military exercises with South Korea, a decision he…
Ballroom or bunker? Trump can't tell the difference
Donald Trump is begging the Supreme Court to save his latest vanity project — a massive new White House ballroom — by falsely claiming it is actually a "military complex" required for national security. Yes, the man who cannot resist gold-plated everything now wants nine justices to believe that what he really needs is a 90,000-square-foot dance floor to protect th…
Why Trump’s polls are even worse than they look
President Trump's approval rating is not just sinking — it is collapsing in a way that should terrify him and his party. New polls show him at a dismal 33% approval, tying the lowest point of his entire political career. But the real nightmare for the GOP is not the overall number; it is the quiet erosion of his most devoted base, the very voters who have always been h…
Trump tries to charm Pyongyang, gets dismissed like a telemarketer
In a move that would make any seasoned diplomat wince, Donald Trump announced he was scaling back military drills with South Korea — framing it as a grand peace gesture toward Pyongyang. But North Korea responded with a shrug. Kim Jong Un's powerful sister, Kim Yo Jong, dismissed the olive branch with clinical contempt, stating that Pyongyang is "un…
Midterms: Democrats surge, rudderless Republicans flounder in new poll
If the midterms were held today, Democrats would crush Republicans by eight points on the generic congressional ballot — 50.7 percent to 43 percent — according to a new Emerson College poll.
It’s not looking good for the GOP, which is not a surprise. President Trump's approval rating is sinking like a stone — just 33 percent according to the rec…
Trump's Iran war forces Pentagon to rethink decades of Gulf dominance
The Pentagon is quietly considering something that would have been unthinkable just months ago: pulling back American troops from the Persian Gulf. After five months of war with Iran, the cost — in blood, money, and battered bases — has forced Washington to confront a painful question. Is the world's most powerful military actually losing a war of…
🔥16😢13🤬10🤯7🙏6😱5💯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @Old_Glory_Vortex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Old_Glory_Vortex edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 608,781 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tech Guide Naveen @TechGuideNaveen · 75,255 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Old Glory Vortex” (@Old_Glory_Vortex), 21,604 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Old_Glory_Vortex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
