Super cycle incoming?

Channel
Old Crypto Mage Calls
@OldCryptoMageCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,755subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001610734861 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OldCryptoMageCalls |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OldCryptoMageCalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 1,755 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 1,756 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 1,762 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 1,762 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
A little more optimistic about this current pump and future altseason. The slow methodical rise suggests accumulation and less market makers intending to liquidate longs/shorts aka fucking the market, let's hope we see a beautiful altszn soon and much more onchain volume. It does feel different this time but this market still sketches me out
Happy New Year everyone. What a year…. thank you to you all and wish you incredible things in 26.
Guys I need the most professional/creative web developer you know. Please refer them to me. Thanks in advance And stay here if you want to be part of a movement.
Don't want to seem like I'm honeydicking here. I'm in real negotiations for something truly incredible. I was even brought back today to a reminder when I donated 376.352 BNB in the name of BMINU and AVA2. You know that'd be over $300K donated in today's price? (and well over 6 figures still at the time - shout out to the community for helping make that possible). Listen boys something will align, either this negotia…
Wait till you see what I have coming
Photo, posted without a caption
3200 ETH, alt szn inbound?
Telling you all now, I get a visceral feeling in my bones that now or very soon is the time to launch. Many ideas but nothing that's too special, and you know what I put out I better believe is very fucking special (waiting on domain idea and another but not holding my breath). My hunch is that something big is coming soon- I might want it to have a cause too, hence leaning towards a charity concept and/or something …
I set an offer for an extremely special domain because of something historical that nobody knows about and has yet to launch. If we get this domain this is multi multi millions easily pre-coded - bigger question is if the owner will sell it. Not holding my breath on this one but if you have that one idea, I still say dm me. If I have to think about why it works it doesn't work. If one can feel viscerally that this is…
I want something $10M+ minimum easily. Zero doubts in the hype and narrative. Keep sending ideas
Bullish launch ideas now that ETH is ~3k? I’ve had a few nice ones. Ultimately hype is the secret recipe 🪄 That said - was thinking what could stand out from all others? Perhaps trying at that OG classic type of vibe, a true throwback no? Think safemoon, NFTart finance, happycoin, etc. talking early 2021 vibes. Won’t touch it unless I think it can do something wild. DMs are open
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OldCryptoMageCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 445,745 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@OldCryptoMageCalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Old Crypto Mage Calls” (@OldCryptoMageCalls), 1,755 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OldCryptoMageCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.