Channel
@OldAlbumNEW
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,389subscribers
+22 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002848738651 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OldAlbumNEW |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OldAlbumNEW |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 4,389 | +22 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 4,367 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 4,367 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 November 2025 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 6,490 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
121 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 115 | 95.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.65% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.826% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#锐评 #小懒猫 @xiaomaoxisohao 1. 吃奶吃了个饱，05后的E杯饱满酥胸，确实解馋啊🥵 2. 妹儿本人的样子跟频道照片去了磨皮基本没差，她话虽然不多，但态度很好，破冰很快，一进门就拉着你坐沙发上关心你是不是热到了，感觉很贴心。 3. 身材方面确实比较肉感，但与E杯巨乳仍是相称，抱起来很舒服，后入更是不摆了👍 4. 挺会调情的，床上的互动很自然也很浓厚，舌吻管饱，服务也做的很投入，舒服得我腰杆都悬空了🤣 5. 昆感绝佳，热度与包裹感都非常命中我的好球区，后入式一进去便感觉到肉壁从各处包围过来，每次抽插都能品味到肉壁的褶皱与火热，实在是诱人得很————于是我123了（悲） 6. 总体而言是很棒的一次性爱，软硬件双双在线的嫩妹是真难得呀，感叹。 2026.07，6p
#锐评 #YY #丫丫 @Yy33588 1. i人妹儿话略少，但态度很好，娇憨可爱。颜值普通路人偏上，属于能看的类型。纹身多却不觉土味，非常难得 2. 教科书般的chubby，拥有梨型身材的同时，该柔软的柔软，该紧实的紧实，真·实战利器 3. 舌吻虽然略显笨拙，但足够配合和热情，随时随地都能舌到饱 4. C奶不大但挺拔，正好能把嘴里塞满，口感绝佳 5.后入巴适得板，昆感也很优秀，能充分感受到包裹和兴奋时内壁的微微抽搐 6. 特别点赞一下代聊，我说不喜欢烟味，希望妹儿能提前用下漱口水之类的，果然安排上了，舌吻的时候一点点烟味都没有，甚至嘴里还有点点甜味❤️ 2026-07，6p
❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
一、基础信息 【妹子花名】：#馨儿 【妹子车牌】： @AK66688866 【验证留名】：豆腐 【验证时间】：2026年6月 【所在位置】：红星桥 【修车水费】：6p 【是否代聊】：自聊 二、硬件评价 【身高体重】：160左右，小小的脸蛋配上肉感的下身，实战利器 【妹子年龄】：未透露，属于御姐 【颜值相似】：和频道照片几乎无差 【肌肤状态】：无纹身无疤痕，手感还可以 【凶器罩杯】：C杯，略软塌 【湿度紧度昆感】：湿度优秀，温度和包裹感不错 三、软件评价 【环境卫生】：温馨的小公寓 【服务内容】：课表里的全都有，服务很用心 【服务态度】：满分，纯度超高的女仆跪式服务 【机车行为】：无 四、综合评价 【优点缺点】：大眼御姐，颜值比较合我口味，当然最让人印象深刻的还是服务，各处细节见真章啊，太棒了。 硬要说缺点就是胸比较普通，也没🐍，但瑕不掩瑜 【性 价 比】： 9.0 分/满分10.0分 【推荐程度】：9.5 …
❤8
成都优质微胖、BBW、坦克车 车牌合集 微胖 #玖月 @yue0521y 极品梨形身材，胸大腰细屁股大，嫩妹 #yy @Yy33588 微胖欧美身材，大胸细腰巨臀，热门车 #嘻嘻 @Cc121381 微胖大胸御姐，能SM #圈圈 @qq886611 微胖大胸少妇 #香菜 @xcovocx 170 D杯微胖大胸御姐 #妖小鹿 @cdnmcj666 172 E杯 微胖大胸嫩妹 微坦 #麻衣酱 @wwwooo7788 微坦小个子欧美巨臀 #胡桃 @CaTuTui_ovo 微坦大只大胸嫩妹，基本不开 #小懒猫 @xiaomaoxisohao 坦克嫩妹 #小奶猫 @Cherishbaby 微坦御姐 #吉安娜 @CDjianna 170 BBW混血车 …
❤18👍1👎1
记笔记记笔记……
#狼友锐评 #依娜 @yina825 依娜回归了，人明显瘦了很多。奶子也小了。肉眼可见的憔悴了。一桌摆的都是味道管理的东西。前戏的大蟒蛇也没了。不过在传教士的时候，还是非常投入的和你蛇在一起。中间cd的时候，还是在手机上算自己的美容店进货卖货情况，可能有些人觉得就是玩手机，我个人觉得还好，毕竟我是cd了。总的来说，5p没有以前的性价比高。有狼友觉得漂亮了，我是觉得花期可能快结束了。且日且珍惜
❤4
龙湖上城天街以后也不太敢去了……想起曾经和某位心尖尖还在这里留下了些许甜腻的回忆，然则昔人已去，鹤杳楼空…………
总结了一哈昨晚小小苏的发言： 被抓是真的，没收手机是因为还没关进去，被抓的地方是龙湖上城，被酒店自己举报的，狼友刚出门就被按了。 原话： 三天而已，已经被抓一次了 以后不用再提心吊胆了，能玩儿手机是警察不在，门口有个守着的 说是要留24小时干嘛，他们来的时候都还没有看我手机就知道我名字了，这家酒店会举报人，我朋友就是在这家被抓的，男的在外面，我在里面询问室，金牛区人民北路一段，这附近的酒店名宿都不要开，以后再也不害怕被抓了 因为已经着了，总之警察没逮到你在床上就不要认，死不承认，有转账记录也不要怕，这次傻逼了，无语！想拉屎厕所有缝，外面还有那个男的和警察，一点隐私都没有！是客人出去直接顺势进来了！
❤13
一、基础信息 【妹子花名】：#青青 【妹子车牌】：@ytlzly 【验证留名】：豆腐 【验证时间】：2026年1月 【所在位置】：建设路 【修车水费】：工兵 【是否代聊】：自聊 二、硬件评价 【身高体重】：155多将近160，肉感小只马 【妹子年龄】：没问，据说16岁，确实胶原蛋白满满 【颜值相似】：本人和频道照片8分像，没图里加了滤镜后那么白，算小美的程度，取了眼镜看有点小徐熙媛的味儿 【肌肤状态】：暖白皮，无纹身无疤痕，手感Q弹细腻 【凶器罩杯】：饱满的C杯，形状如小山一般傲人 【湿度紧度昆感】：湿度正常，包裹感不错 三、软件评价 【环境卫生】：才租的短租公寓，妹儿抽烟，但房间内无异味 【服务内容】：课表里的全都有 【服务态度】：很活泼可爱的妹儿，全程0冷场，态度很棒，服务也很投入 【机车行为】：无 四、综合评价 【优点缺点】：青春洋溢的肉体配上活泼可爱的性格，非常戳中我的好球区，实在要挑刺的话就是妹儿因为抽…
❤24
共勉
👏2
翻到自己在25年2月份一次重坦踩雷后的复盘，大家引以为戒。 一句话总结:好比是看到裸露的肌肤立马联想到性一样，看到雷就要联想到踩雷的后果，金钱的损失，糟糕的心情，一系列后果，从而迅速调整自己的行为，做出转身的决定并坚定的执行，可以放下脸面和道德，不给钱，一定要走出那扇门，不要被对方的表情、言语和行为所挽留。 建议:设置一些转身的标准（比如年龄大，体重大，卫生差，人照差距大之类的， 如果对方满足，就坚定转身，不要犹豫，多呆一秒都可能同情对方或者被对方的热情吞噬）
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OldAlbumNEW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,080,847 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OLD ALBUM（复活版）” (@OldAlbumNEW), 4,389 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OldAlbumNEW.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.