橘子高质小号货源网 http://ll.9faka.cc/
👍2🤮2💔1😁1

Channel
@ORANGEFRER
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
54,688subscribers
-744 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002071466963 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ORANGEFRER |
| Description | 橘子全版本公告声明 ↔ 本系列作品仅供学习研究,使用者的任何行为与应用作者无关,请在24小时内删除本应用 [下载代表同意本协议] ↔ 若有侵权违法行为,请联系我删除内容 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ORANGEFRER |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 54,688 | -69 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 54,757 | -25 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 54,782 | -58 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 54,840 | -81 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 54,921 | -63 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 54,984 | -79 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 55,063 | -70 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 55,133 | -53 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 55,186 | -47 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 55,233 | -46 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 55,279 | -62 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 55,341 | -32 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 55,373 | -59 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 55,432 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 55,432 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 7 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (7 December 2024 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 446 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 01:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
9,232 reactions across 21 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4,198 | 45.5% | |
| 😱 | 1,707 | 18.5% | |
| ❤ | 1,126 | 12.2% | |
| 😭 | 496 | 5.37% | |
| 👎 | 284 | 3.08% | |
| 🤬 | 240 | 2.60% | |
| 😁 | 219 | 2.37% | |
| 👏 | 165 | 1.79% | |
| 🖕 | 150 | 1.62% | |
| 🥴 | 133 | 1.44% | |
| 🥰 | 83 | 0.899% | |
| 🤔 | 73 | 0.791% | |
| 🍌 | 69 | 0.747% | |
| 🤪 | 49 | 0.531% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 0.39% | |
| 😢 | 36 | 0.39% | |
| 😘 | 35 | 0.379% | |
| 🌭 | 33 | 0.357% | |
| 🤡 | 32 | 0.347% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 0.108% | |
| 13 further kinds | 58 | 0.628% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,232reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2024 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
橘子高质小号货源网 http://ll.9faka.cc/
👍2🤮2💔1😁1
到底谁说做环境就不能演戏了,我就不能环境好演戏强吗,你说行为大于环境,确实,但我就不能两个都做吗,你非要二选一我也没办法
👍224❤57😭8🥰4
还有的人质疑游戏真的检测这些吗,我给你随便拿和平精英的部分检测名单看看,他最少检测几万个文件,记录都爆满
👍263❤128👎19🥰14😁7🎅5👏2
新年快乐 喵
👍136❤28👎17🌭8👏6🔥2👀1
提示网络异常是你们开了那个什么禁止curl吧,如果进去了但是无法下载才是地区问题
👍71❤30🔥11😁3
任何售后问题请联系卡网客服QQ处理
❤66😁5🤝3
马上更新
👍1,080🤬58🥰47🤔37😘35❤31😁21👏7
和平新赛季有大动作了,因为我发现它的内存分布变化了很大,可能是要有加密了或者要上三角洲暗区那种检测,你说我猜的对不对呀和平大大😘
👍580😱249❤84👎26😁16🍌11💘7
新赛季的橘子辅助不再更新,以后只更新驱动了
😱1,440😭488🖕150👍59❤55👎54😢36🤬26
目前2.68版本有很多bug,但本人目前没空修复,要准备下周的期末考试,一直持续到15号左右。所以大家可以暂时先用4.0或者2.67
🥴133👍65❤58🤬36👎21🤓3😁1
橘子过验证.sh
👍162❤82😁14👏11🤔11🥰11🙏4
大家别玩自瞄了,难道没发现拉闸的基本都是自瞄吗,还是早点练技术玩单透吧
👍221👎74❤50✍8😁6🌭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @ORANGEFRER. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“橘子公益长期通知频道” (@ORANGEFRER), 54,688 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ORANGEFRER.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.