Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NovaUBI

Channel

NovaUBI

@NovaUBI

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,579subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001921587780
TypeChannel
Username@NovaUBI
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 9 July 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NovaUBI

Growth

1,5791,5931,5866 August 2026 — 1,593 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,593 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,592 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,591 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,584 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,580 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,579 subscribers6 August 202620 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 15 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,577–1,595 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 19:561,579-1
17 Aug 2026, 09:531,580-4
13 Aug 2026, 13:171,584-7
10 Aug 2026, 07:361,591-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:321,592-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:321,593no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:171,593first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,834 reactions across 19 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰4,05629.3%
🤩2,92521.1%
2,23816.2%
🔥2,18815.8%
👍1,39310.1%
👏7945.74%
👎820.593%
💩430.311%
😁270.195%
❤‍🔥240.173%
🤬150.108%
🤣120.087%
🎉80.058%
🤮80.058%
😱70.051%
🐳50.036%
🦄30.022%
🤓20.014%
🤡20.014%
🌭10.007%
1 further kind10.007%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,834reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2023 to 28 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 May 2024, 15:11 UTC≈3,140 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/NovaUBI/status/1795470450690285627

17👎13💩13🤣7😁7

28 May 2024, 10:24 UTC≈3,080 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/NovaUBI/status/1795028054332621088

5🤣4🔥2

18 Sept 2023, 18:03 UTC≈5,250 views84 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

NOVAUBI Announcement: $NOVA will be delisted from MEXC Please withdraw your tokens as soon as possible and go to DEX to continue trading $NOVA

👎46👍13🤬11😱7😁41👏1🤣1

5 Aug 2023, 12:53 UTC≈6,690 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1dRJZMEYaYvGB?s=20

👍24👎101

26 Jul 2023, 11:34 UTC≈37,300 views218 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💚Nova UBI Passport Drop Is Live! 📅 July 26th 11:00 UTC — August 10th 11:00 UTC 🤝 Help us spread #NovaUBI, Stake $NOVA to Earn #NovaUBIPassport! https://medium.com/@novaubipro/nova-ubi-passport-drop-223d84e0f642

👍15724🔥13😁13🤩10🤬1

20 Jul 2023, 07:16 UTC≈15,000 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📢 Introducing the Nova UBI Passport! 🌐 ✅ Complete tasks, promote $NOVA, and earn your passport to access exclusive benefits and UBI Relief Funds.🪙 🧪 Ride with us in this crazy fun Social Experiment!🚀 https://medium.com/@novaubipro/introducing-nova-ubi-passport-the-nova-revolution-begins-c6b0c0f91ce5

🔥4514👍12🤬1

19 Jul 2023, 15:52 UTC≈8,730 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🚀 Big News Alert! 📢 We're thrilled to announce a game-changing move for our amazing #NovaArmy! 🎮 🏆 We'll buy back $NOVA with 100 $ETH from Relief Funds to reward our dedicated community developers, volunteers, and champions! 🔥 We appreciate your support and it's time we give back! 💰 Let's make $NOVA a true force of change in the crypto universe! 🌌 🌠 Together, we'll build a cryptopia where everyone has a voice, a

🔥34👍85🎉3🐳1🤬1

18 Jul 2023, 07:30 UTC≈4,180 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🗳 Community Poll: Have Your Say in Distributing the $NOVA UBI Relief Funds! We're excited to announce the community poll to determine the recipients of the $NOVA UBI Relief Funds.💚 🧠Together, we'll ensure that the $NOVA UBI Relief Funds Distribution reflects our community's collective will. Help us shape the direction of the UBI Relief Funds distribution.🤝 Make your voice heard!🌐 Thank you for being an integral

👍14🔥52🤬1🤷‍♀1

16 Jul 2023, 01:13 UTC≈3,940 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://twitter.com/purpledudenft/status/1680215308517228546?s=19

14👎2👍1

13 Jul 2023, 11:33 UTC≈4,560 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

How about we utilize $ETH from the marketing wallet address to accelerate the realization of the UBI concept? Anyone who wants to contribute to the UBI can donate $NOVA or $ETH. UBI CA: 0x573136a967382d4747AD62E1560513141Aea4F32 Your contribution will make a difference. No matter the size of your contribution, it will help accelerate the implementation of UBI, enabling more people to benefit from this innovative

👍40👎8🔥76💩1🤮1

13 Jul 2023, 08:04 UTC≈3,840 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

NovaWorld #NovaArmy

👍255🎉3👏2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NovaUBI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,341,448 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NovaUBI” (@NovaUBI), 1,579 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NovaUBI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.