Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nati Ambas

Channel

Nati Ambas

@NatiAmbas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,743subscribers

+328 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003822337605
TypeChannel
Username@NatiAmbas
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/NatiAmbas

Growth

2,3972,7432,5707 August 2026 — 2,415 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,415 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,419 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,406 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,397 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,477 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,502 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,539 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,561 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,584 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,628 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,743 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net +328. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,345–2,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 02:382,743+115
2 Sept 2026, 02:132,628+44
30 Aug 2026, 08:572,584+23
27 Aug 2026, 18:082,561+22
24 Aug 2026, 14:172,539+37
21 Aug 2026, 07:452,502+25
18 Aug 2026, 15:482,477+80
15 Aug 2026, 17:072,397-9
11 Aug 2026, 19:052,406-13
8 Aug 2026, 13:152,419+4
7 Aug 2026, 20:172,415no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:212,415first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4534.6%
2519.2%
👏118.46%
🙏96.92%
🤔96.92%
👍75.38%
😭75.38%
💊43.08%
😢43.08%
😱32.31%
🥰21.54%
🍌10.769%
🍾10.769%
👀10.769%
😎10.769%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC414 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Link da aposta abaixo https://www.betano.bet.br/bookingcode/MBRWYX6H/

🔥13👍1

6 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC629 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Galera ao clicar no link irá abrir a playbook só clicar em bet365 e logar que o link está pronto

6 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC634 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Odd 9 Clique aqui para ver o bilhete ☕

🤔3👀1🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC771 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://www.betano.bet.br/bookingcode/ARFYNAF9

🤔2🔥1🙏1

2 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,150 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://www.betano.bet.br/bookingcode/H5DRRTHX

💊4👍1

2 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC≈1,020 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

E essa galera para 2 faltas cada? Achei boa a odd Clique aqui para ver o bilhete ⚠️ Link alternativo ❇️

👍1

2 Aug 2026, 00:19 UTC928 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Depois de dois jogos 0_0 né possível https://www.betano.bet.br/bookingcode/FVKUN8K9

🔥4

1 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC957 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://www.betano.bet.br/bookingcode/8S73SGYQ

👍3🙏1

1 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC970 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Clique aqui para ver o bilhete ☕ Hulk, Cassierra e Neymar para marcarem 🛒

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NatiAmbas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nati Ambas” (@NatiAmbas), 2,743 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NatiAmbas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.