1 Jan 2026, 11:41 UTC≈3,350 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
The Natalie team wishes you a fantastic new year! May you stay healthy, be kind, and find joy in everything you do! 👑
❤17🎉3
Channel
Natalie Updates
@NatalieNews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,897subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001437258615 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NatalieNews |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NatalieNews |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 1,897 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 1,901 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 1,905 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 1,908 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 1,901 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 1,900 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 1,902 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 1,900 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 25 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
743 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 306 | 41.2% | |
| ❤ | 173 | 23.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 37 | 4.98% | |
| 🎉 | 34 | 4.58% | |
| ⚡ | 31 | 4.17% | |
| 🥰 | 27 | 3.63% | |
| 🕊 | 25 | 3.36% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 3.23% | |
| 🙏 | 22 | 2.96% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 1.88% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 1.35% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 1.21% | |
| 🐳 | 8 | 1.08% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 0.942% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 0.942% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 0.942% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.269% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 743reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2022 to 1 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
12 Apr 2024, 04:27 UTC≈19,500 views127 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Greetings folks, Telegram had silently caused an issue with Kang command due to their recent update, Now i've added quickfix that should resolve issue where stickers couldn't be added. Have a good day! - Dante.
👍66❤32🔥9🎉8🤩6😁6
31 Dec 2023, 16:08 UTC≈22,800 views77 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Wishing the community a joyous New Year filled with prosperity, good health, and memorable moments! May the coming year bring you all the success and happiness you deserve. Cheers to new beginnings!
❤45🥰13👍9👏6😍2🎉1🕊1
27 Dec 2023, 04:45 UTC≈21,500 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
About Development: Hello Users, Yes I'm aware that the development of Natalie has been stalled for quite while. The fact that I have been heavily involved in the development of another project; However I assure you that Natalie is now actively being developed and I'm working on rewriting the bot again under new framework. With plans of reintroducing features such as Connect commands. will be part of road map. I co…
👍31🔥12🏆4
24 Dec 2023, 04:55 UTC≈14,100 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Merry Christmas 🎄
❤🔥25❤7🐳5👌3👍2
9 Feb 2023, 19:24 UTC≈22,500 views80 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo
Dear Users, Since 4 days ago, Türkiye 🇹🇷 and Syria 🇸🇾 was hit by devastating earthquakes, thousands of people have been injured or have lost their lives in 7.8 and 7.5 magnitude earthquakes. Many of the affected families are in need of your help, with climate dropping to -7 celsius at the night, families that are affected do not have enough resources nor places to stay. Many of survivors have gathered around the deb…
❤38👍22🙏17🕊2👏1
9 Feb 2023, 18:44 UTC≈16,000 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
We had changed the mechanism to handle new updates for every response from groups, which makes Natalie handle new messages and data more conveniently, given the fact that Natalie grew considerably larger, the previous method of handling incoming and outgoing calls was pressurising on servers and thus had created unwanted high spikes on usages during peak hours, this issue should be solved to ensure full uptime and gu…
👍15❤5🕊4🙏2
4 Jan 2023, 06:55 UTC≈13,800 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Attention Dear users, last few weeks we noticed bot was having frequent downtimes and it is apparent not related to our server rather it’s a feature issue, we are not able to find the cause of this downtime, so over weeks we will debug this issue on production by disabling-enabling certain features, therefore some of the features may or may not work until we are certain of the issue in the code. We apologise for th…
👍21🕊7❤6
1 Jan 2023, 04:50 UTC≈10,300 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
it’s the new year has begin, may this year brings you a lots of happiness and success! 🌟
❤15❤🔥4🥰4🎉3
8 Dec 2022, 17:02 UTC≈13,600 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo
Strategy Battle Game ⚔ Dear Users There are plenty of fun and immersive games online that can help both beginner and more experienced players make some new virtual friends. One of the game is the Middle Earth Wars. Middle Earth Wars(@rModeratorbot) is a strategy battle game bot which is based on the Lord of the Rings. It features an amazing storyline. It provides you a quality time with your friends, and you can j…
👍10👏6❤3🔥3🤩3🐳1
23 Nov 2022, 15:06 UTC≈10,900 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
🔔Natalie is back! We worked hard to bring her back online after prolonged period of server issues that are beyond our control. Hopefully, this also should solve constant downtime issues, lag in response time, and other various factors that caused unwanted inconvenience. We truly appreciate your patience and loyalty to Natalie! We also would like to mention that Natalie is currently being managed by two owners and …
👍27🥰9❤3
22 Nov 2022, 10:02 UTC≈8,510 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Natalie Maintenance Natalie is currently offline due to network connections issues, We will do our best bring her back online. We apologise for any inconvenience caused. EDIT: all current database are on main server, however we are running the bot on the test environment, so there will not be any data for now. we will update on next post once we get the system completely restored.. EDIT 1; we have contacted our h…
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @NatalieNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 463,641 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Natalie Updates” (@NatalieNews), 1,897 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NatalieNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.