Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 28% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 59 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,047–1,081 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 14:22
1,051
-1
27 Sept 2026, 15:17
1,052
-1
17 Sept 2026, 23:20
1,053
-1
13 Sept 2026, 20:19
1,054
-3
10 Sept 2026, 10:39
1,057
-6
5 Sept 2026, 14:19
1,063
-3
1 Sept 2026, 15:07
1,066
-2
30 Aug 2026, 01:19
1,068
-1
27 Aug 2026, 09:55
1,069
-1
24 Aug 2026, 16:14
1,070
-3
21 Aug 2026, 05:14
1,073
-2
14 Aug 2026, 13:45
1,075
-2
10 Aug 2026, 23:58
1,077
+2
8 Aug 2026, 00:16
1,075
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:59
1,075
first reading
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
44 reactions across 3 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
21
47.7%
🔥
8
18.2%
❤🔥
5
11.4%
😍
4
9.09%
🥰
4
9.09%
👍
2
4.55%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Давно здесь ничего не писала, но сегодня не могу остаться в стороне.
Пострадал ещё один склад — теперь уже в области моего города. Хочу выразить искренние слова поддержки всем, кого коснулось случившееся: тем, кто потерял близких, работу или результаты своего труда, сотрудникам склада, селлерам, дизайнерам, менеджерам и всем специалистам, чья деятельность была связана с этим местом.
Желаю всем сил, поддержки и возм…
Такая вот уютная карточка на ароматизатор получилась.
В каждой карточке у нас сохранена некая стилистика бренда, в которой работаем уже второй год.
Я тут в ходе работы находила для себя лайфхаки по нейросетям, например, в случае с дальним планом ковер на полу превращался в жуткий пиксельный слой и пришлось включить воображение, чтобы получить текстурный реальный материал 😁 Так же с семьей, ох сколько было проделано…
И второй товар из этой же серии 💜
Еще в первый раз я хотела реализовать слайд, на котором покажу природную страсть и эмоции через красивые картинки, но я никак не могла добиться от нейросети результата, как я это вижу. Во второй раз я довела дело до конца и теперь сильно кайфую от 1 слайда 🤤
——————————————————
🔗 ПРАЙС ДИЗАЙН
🔗 ПРАЙС НЕЙРОСЕТИ
Купить Нейросети пользуюсь сама
VPN месяц бесплатно по моей ссылке
❤9❤🔥5😍2🔥1
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @NastuWB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дизайн товарных карточек для маркетплейсов | Инфографика WILDBERRIES | OZON” (@NastuWB), 1,051 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NastuWB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.